The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• C19H15Cl2O4 → Rebamipide  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

C19H15Cl2O4 was created by mistake: formula of Rebamipide is C19H15ClN2O4. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C₁₉H₁₅Cl₂O₄. I propose to delete it. (C19H15ClN2O4 is in the list of redirs to create by bot so I didn't create it manually.) Gyimhu (talk) 23:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This redirect was apparently created in error. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:20, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom & Ed. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 15:37, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per CSD G3 by 2405:9800:BA30:C21A:B401:FE10:B77F:3D57 (talk) 05:37, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A mistake is not vandalism so G3 doesn't seem to apply. Also the "vandalism" was added by the above anon along with a g3 tag which I reverted. Anyway for this one assuming it's a mistake like mentioned in by the nom, then delete it. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 05:48, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Serenes Forest → Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The name of a fansite that is irrelevant to the actual game and not mentioned in the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:54, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Serenes Forest is incredibly important to many in the community and redirects are WP:CHEAP. Useful navigational tool. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 22:05, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• My argument isn't that it is not important, but that there is nowhere sensible for it to point to. If it cannot be an article, it should be deleted._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:25, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From a quick Google search for Serenes Forest, it seems that it isn't just limited to covering this one game but the Fire Emblem series as a whole. Still not sure it'd be worth keeping as a redirect (to this page or any page related to Fire Emblem) though. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 06:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. If there's no mention of it then it cannot be a "useful navigational tool". —Xezbeth (talk) 07:49, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Agree with Zxcvbnm and Xezbeth. Colin M (talk) 14:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 17:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Fire EMblem → Fire Emblem  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely typo for a game title. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 10:36, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. {{R from miscapitalization}}. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 22:05, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• This kind of thing would open up a WP:PANDORA's box if it was a valid miscapitalization. Fire EmBlem, Fire EmbLem, etc. R from miscapitalization is, IMO, geared more towards things like "Fire emblem"._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:38, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, not a particularly likely or unique typo. The main functions of {{R from miscapitalization}} are aiding searches and maintaining links; this redirect fails in both regards as 22 views per year does not imply significant utility and there are no incoming links. ComplexRational (talk) 07:27, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, harmless {{R from miscapitalization}}. There is no evidence that this redirect existing has encouraged the creation of other such redirects, nor why that would be a bad thing if it did. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:10, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not a likely or natural capitalization error. {{R from miscapitalisation}} is not a license to keep any old thing. PC78 (talk) 01:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Harmless miscapitalization that results from one of the more common miscapitalization errors (i.e. still holding shift after a properly capitalized results in the second also being capitalized). ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 06:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep and refine to the Common elements section. --BDD (talk) 17:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Magic in the Fire Emblem series → Fire Emblem  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Weapons in the Fire Emblem Series → Fire Emblem  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Little mention of this in the article. WP:NOTGUIDE style cruft. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 10:32, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Fire Emblem#Gameplay. WP:NOTGUIDE applies to articles; not redirects. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 22:19, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I've WP:BOLDly retargeted the page per the above user's suggestion. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 06:07, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Fire_Emblem#Common_elements, since while the Gameplay sections contains the bulk of the relevant content, the Setting section above mentions the Fire Emblem, which is a magic weapon. Therefore, it makes sense to redirect to the higher level section. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 06:28, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• C16H16Cl3N5O → PSB-10  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

C16H16Cl3N5O was created by mistake: formula of PSB-10 is C16H14Cl3N5O. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C₁₆H₁₆Cl₃N₅O. I propose to delete it. (C16H14Cl3N5O is in the list of redirs to create by bot so I didn't create it manually.) Gyimhu (talk) 22:58, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per nom. Pichpich (talk) 23:33, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 15:37, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 17:40, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Center for Brain and Cognition → V. S. Ramachandran  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect has two problems: the first is that it's pointing at the director of the UCSD Center for Brain and Cognition, as opposed to the center itself (article does not exist) or its parent organization (UCSD). The second is that there is at least one other such-titled center of roughly equal prominence, the CBC at UPF Barcelona. I would suggest that as neither of these centers has articles right now, this should be converted to a redlink for lack of a clearly suitable target. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:30, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was unaware of the Barcelona center when I created the redirect page. The CBC at UCSD is essentially VS Ramachandran's research group. Neither of the two CBCs seems to be an "official" research center of its university. Neither university article mentions its CBC. I don't see enough news coverage for either to make it notable enough for a standalone article. Perhaps a disambiguation page that mentions both CBCs and includes some hyperlinks would be better than a simple redirect? HouseOfChange (talk) 01:58, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, if it's really the case that neither center is notable at all and that the UCSD CBC is just Ramachandran's work group, then maybe leaving it as is is the best option. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As for its being Ramachandran's work group, there is a very funny description of a meeting there near the end of the 2009 New Yorker profile of him. I searched en-wiki for the term, and several articles mention the UCSD CBC, including the lead section of VS Ramachandran. So I would support leaving the redirect. HouseOfChange (talk) 02:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 17:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Stripe graphic → Warming stripes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Stripe diagram → Warming stripes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Too vague, no indication that these refer to climate diagrams. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:13, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep:

-- Stripe graphic is now recited in the article and also in:

- https://lifehacker.com/see-how-climate-change-has-affected-your-area-with-warm-1835612836

- https://climaterealitychicago.com/show-your-stripes/

-- warming stripe graphic or "warming stripe" graphic is used in:

- the inventor's tweet: https://twitter.com/ed_hawkins/status/1140622501917147136

- https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/the-energy-202/2019/06/18/the-energy-202-a-federal-watchdog-is-investigating-trump-administration-s-decisions-on-utah-monument/5d07b4c8a7a0a4586bb2db10/

- https://www.mytwintiers.com/news-cat/local-news/check-out-the-change-in-new-york-and-pennsylvanias-climate-on-show-your-stripes-day/

-- "Stripe diagram" is based on Wikimedia Commons categories Climate change diagrams, Global warming diagrams, etc.

-- The graphic was invented by a climate scientist to visualize specific data (temperatures) for a specific purpose (global warming). The two broader^{not "vague"} terms you list above simply don't yet have a separate and broader Wikipedia article. —RCraig09 (talk) 19:07, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per WP:SURPRISE._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 16:43, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – plausible search term, redirects are cheap, and I'm not seeing anything to disambiguate, so I don't see why we wouldn't keep the redirect. – Levivich 15:14, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 17:29, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• 2019 J.League Cup / Copa Sudamericana Championship Final → 2019 J.League Cup / Copa Sudamericana Championship  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not really something that wouldn't be looked at. HawkAussie (talk) 00:58, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. As of this point, this redirect has some article-namespace links that would be broken if this redirect was deleted. Steel1943 (talk) 02:11, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. @Steel1943: Should be all fixed by now. Chanheigeorge (talk) 18:18, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:20, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as possible search term. GiantSnowman 10:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. MBisanz ^talk 18:01, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Upper Village → Forest Hill, Toronto  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Ambiguous term, based on internet search results the most well-known "Upper Village" is in Whistler, BC, but it's also a moniker used in several other locations. I would suggest deletion and letting the search engine do its work due to the lack of a clear primary target. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:55, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps create a disambiguation page? Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 01:19, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I considered that, but it is further complicated by the fact that "Upper Village" is often merely a subtopic of an actual article--we don't have much in the way of full articles on these subjects (and at least a few seem to be missing entirely). My advocating for deletion is more on the principle of not surprising people looking for one of these places by dropping them in an article that is only marginally even about the other ones. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Way too generic a name. I agree that it's not a good candidate for disambiguation, having done some searching to see if we could support it. --BDD (talk) 17:28, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget. --BDD (talk) 17:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Cosmogenic → Environmental radioactivity#Natural  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Would cosmogenic nuclide be a more appropriate target? The current redirect is to a section with a hatnote pointing to that article, and I am not aware of another possible primary topic for the term cosmogenic (at least in this broad context). ComplexRational (talk) 18:05, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as overly vague. The search engine results when a person types in "cosmogenic" would be more helpful._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:35, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to cosmogenic nuclide. It is a fairly complete article on the topic and it is hard to see cosmogenic wanting to be anywhere else. Although we could probably manage without it, there isn't really any strong reason to delete the redirect; it doesn't meet any of the main reasons to delete. Lithopsian (talk) 14:32, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to cosmogenic nuclide. That's what I did some eons ago, and I still think this to be the best solution. --Pjacobi (talk) 11:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Любе → Lyube  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The Cyrillic in the redirect is a misspelling of the subject's name in Russian, which is Любэ. I would suggest deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:39, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Implausible typo. James-the-Charizard (talk) 04:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per above - typo. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 15:38, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. People who speak Russian likely won't make this typo, and people who don't speak Russian will likely come here via copy/paste. Even if they come here by entering the letters individually, they'll probably use something like Character Map or a list of Russian letters, and they'll copy letters one-by-one, and if they're taking the effort to do that, they'll notice if they make a mistake, since е and э are quite different, unlike э and з, or ш and щ. Either way, it's highly unlikely that anglophones will make this mistake. Nyttend (talk) 02:12, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:59, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• C34H52N4O4 → Protoporphyrinogen IX  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

C34H52N4O4 was created by mistake: formula of Protoporphyrinogen IX is C34H38N4O4. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C₃₄H₅₂N₄O₄. I propose to delete it. (C34H38N4O4 is in the list of redirs to create by bot so I didn't create it manually.) Gyimhu (talk) 22:27, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Pichpich (talk) 23:32, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 15:39, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete by IP address 2405:9800:BA30:C21A:B401:FE10:B77F:3D57 (talk) 05:18, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 14:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• A room full of monkeys → Infinite monkey theorem  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:THE. The phrase is not mentioned in the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, this is a plausible generalization of the theorem, and I don't see competing usage. WP:THE is for article titles, not redirects. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:14, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. A quick google search shows that the phrase "a room full of monkeys" is commonly used to refer to the setup of the infinite monkey theorem. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 06:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:58, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh Great → Oh! great  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:SURPRISE. The exclamation point in the redirected title makes it somewhat different than this generic phrase. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:35, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep as a plausible and seemingly unambiguous misspelling. Might be surprising, but doesn't impede navigation or cause harm in any other way that I know of. Geolodus (talk) 08:16, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as plausible. If I hear someone named this, I would think it's formatted "Oh Great" instead of "Oh! great". -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:03, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Tavix. The exclamation point in the redirected title makes it quite implausible: there's no way we'd use an exclamation point like this if it weren't part of a name, and we shouldn't expect readers to know that it's there. Nyttend (talk) 02:16, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:58, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Mad (Tv Series) → Mad (TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:RDAB. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:26, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom. –Dave | Davey2010^Talk 15:39, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:RDAB doesn't apply here, but there are two capitalization errors in the disambiguator, which makes this an unlikely typo. - Eureka Lott 17:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:58, 25 August 2019 (UTC)reply]

• Smells Like Teen Spirit\ → (talk · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:UNNATURAL. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:22, 18 August 2019 (UTC)reply]

• Dave | Davey2010^Talk 15:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, unnatural typing error. PC78 (talk) 04:19, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]