The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:07, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:P8280017.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by David Shankbone (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unidentified subject, plausibly uploaded in error. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:50, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:07, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:P1010201.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by A9l8e7n (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unidentified plant. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:50, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Per proposal. MBisanz ^talk 17:01, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dido Safe Trip Home.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by StephenN17 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The album cover is based on the 1984 photograph of Bruce McCandless II floating in space. The copyrights are attributed to NASA. What was changed, was the addition of the Dido (singer) logo and the name of the album. Although it is mere text, Dido and Safe Trip Home are British, so the copyright status is not necessarily {{pd-textlogo}}. So my suggestion would be to 1) tag as {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} and {{PD-USGov-NASA}} if the logo is considered original enough in the UK, or on the opposite, 2) tag {{PD-USGov-NASA}} and {{PD-textlogo}} to it, upload a larger version of the cover, and tag it as {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}}. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 18:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Re-license {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} and {{PD-USGov-NASA}} per nom. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canada's Food Guide (2007-2018).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mabdul (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Delete per WP:NFCC. One cover (File:Canada's Food Guide.jpgFile:Canada's Food Guide.png) is sufficient for identification of the work (WP:NFCC#3a). This cover is not used as the primary means of visual identification contrary to the rationale and is not subject of critical commentary (WP:NFCC#8). — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The article doesn't provide critical commentary or sourcing that would suggest a defensible NFCC rationale. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 17:01, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Over the next few days I will update the article to reflect the significant changes between the two. For many Canadians the image in question is a representation of the only "Canada's Food Guide" they ever knew, as we just got a new one within the last few weeks. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:09, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  The differences between the two can be described using text. If you're talking about adding critical commentary about the covers, then that is another story. Two images are not needed to identify the work. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:29, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete still nothing in the way of critical sourced commentary. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:32, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The currently stated purpose is for visual identification. It is not needed for that purpose any more with the new guide image. -- Whpq (talk) 12:20, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. The Commons DR closed as keep. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:46, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:F-4D Phantom II.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chetsford (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Not public domain, per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:F-4D Phantom II.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:48, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep on Wikipedia, though I have no position on its status on Commons. The file's licensing tag has been updated to reflect that this is not a work of the US government but, nonetheless, has been released to the public domain. The hosting entity of the image has clearly labeled it a public domain image using the words PUBLIC DOMAIN and the "copyright free" circle/slash logo. The hosting entity, the Defense Visual Information Distribution Service, does not label all images it hosts using these two symbols, thus indicating these release terms were selectively applied as an intentional indicator of this image's PD status. The hosting entity is not a random blog or Flickr page but is, in fact, a major publisher and distributor of visual content with a legal personality and it can be reasonably assumed it competently and accurately labeled this as a Public Domain image. Chetsford (talk) 22:31, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep ¶ The Defense Media Activity (DMA) has labeled this image as "PUBLIC DOMAIN" and says, "This work, F-4D MiG-killer of 507th Tactical Fighter Wing, Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma [Image 5 of 5], must comply with the restrictions shown on https://www.dvidshub.net/about/copyright." That latter link takes the reader to a page that says,
  "In general, all media on the site is produced by U.S. DoD or Federal Agencies, and is in the public domain, i.e., not protected by U.S. copyright; however, other restrictions might apply, such as, but not limited to, the right to enforce trademarks, and the right of privacy/right of publicity, any of which might restrict use of some of the media. Media may not be used to imply endorsement of any product or service by the DoD. […] Proper credit of the producing journalist(s) is requested. […] Please use contact page to inquire or report inappropriate use of copyright notices on media."
  If we are unsure about the copyright and crediting of "Don Jay", have we inquired at their contact page as instructed? — fourthords | =Λ= | 20:27, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Let's wait for the Commons discussion to close first. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:22, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. MBisanz ^talk 17:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cayton-Horace-R-Sr.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Carrite (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No evidence that this was published prior to January 1, 1924 (indeed, no date at all); nor for any other reason for it being PD. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:07, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Site blackpast.org asserts this photo of newspaper publisher Horace R. Cayton is "public domain" HERE. Person who made this claim is specified. Cayton died nearly 80 years ago, I will additionally note. As editor of his selected words, Ed Diaz would know if it is a public domain photo or not. It is not irrational to accept this assertion as accurate any more than it is irrational to accept an assertion on Flicker of an image being copyright clear — actually, it is even more sound since there is a documented scholarly backing for such an assertion. Carrite (talk) 16:49, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Reliable source asserts that this is in the public domain, but does not explain why. This is covered by the PD tag that says: "This image is in the public domain in the United States. In most cases, this means that it was first published prior to January 1, 1924 (see the template documentation for more cases)." – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:08, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vase Europa and the bull.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Maxaxax (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is clearly dated 1929, so is highly unlikely to be from an 1871 book. It's also obviously a modern drawing, and not a photograph of a vase as implied by the title. If it's from 1929 it might still be PD depending on the circumstances of its publication and who the artist was, but we can't just assume, and the apparently faked attribution makes me suspicious.  ‑ Iridescent 2 00:15, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• No idea about copyright status, but it appears to be some of the artwork - an invitation, or an entrance ticket? - from the Bal des Quat'z'Arts in 1929, with its Crete/Knossos/Minos theme. (So perhaps Pasiphaë conceiving the Minotaur with the bull of Poseidon, rather than Europa and Jupiter disguised as a bull.) The caption in the image is French; a more legible version here: [1]. That site says it was designed by an architecture student, "Jean d'Orsay" (who? possibly a pseudonym, but also possibly alive into the 1950s). 213.205.198.144 (talk) 22:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Excellent reseach, 213. I couldn’t quite read the caption, but I knew it was neither Athenian nor pictured in Mommsen. And the date is very clear.Kafka Liz (talk) 00:36, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Either way, the image as currently tagged is both incorrect and grossly misleading. As its true attribution is likely on the border of expired copyright, and we don't know for sure, alas it should probably go. Ceoil (talk) 23:31, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:18, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. MBisanz ^talk 17:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vcmerrifield-photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Emirrorsolutions (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused, missing source and attribution details (no way to verify that the image is PD as claimed) FASTILY 02:41, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: File is currently in use on the article William Merrifield. Salavat (talk) 13:57, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Convert to fair use. Patchy licensing added by various users who are not the original uploader. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This can be legitimate PD-Canada, which covers all pre-1949 photographs, as Merrifield died in 1942. Kges1901 (talk) 17:24, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Konstantinos V. Petrides Photo.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by OscarKoryagin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Image is watermarked with a copyright notice. OTRS verification will be needed. Whpq (talk) 13:05, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:P5010022.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lilfarmgal (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unidentified darkly lit room; out of scope. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Orphaned file and out of scope --Atomicdragon136 (talk) 17:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:50, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:P5110004 copy.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rollerhockeydude (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unidentified, low resolution photo; out of scope. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:51, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 23:51, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. New upload moved to File:Gyan Bharti Model Residential Complex 2016.jpg — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:15, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gyan Bharti Compound.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Includents.h (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Old revision is non-free, copied from the school website. —Gazoth (talk) 20:09, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New version is my own image from my phone.. and old version was also clicked. Includents.h (talk) 20:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't see any issue with the current image, but the image in the history is problematic. The image appears on the school's website. It will need to be deleted as a non-free revision unless permission is confirmed via an email to OTRS. -- Whpq (talk) 12:35, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 * Please delete older version of this fileIncludents.h (talk) 08:27, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 February 18. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:15, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr.Abdullah Al Jazi.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Troy Nelson (hockey, born 1962).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TheDaltonian (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

30 years not long enough to be out of copyright. Anything published in US with notice post 1964 is still in copyright Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:47, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - invalid public domain reasoning -- Whpq (talk) 22:27, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 February 18. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:YannyLaurel.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.