Rhododendron // (from Ancient Greek ῥόδον rhódon “rose” and δένδρον déndron “tree”) is a genus of 1,024 species of woody plants in the heath family (Ericaceae), either evergreen or deciduous, and found mainly in Asia, although it is also widespread throughout the highlands of the Appalachian Mountains of North America. It is the national flower of Nepal as well as the state flower of West Virginia and Washington. Most species have brightly coloured flowers which bloom from late winter through to early summer.
- 1 Species
- 2 Description
- 3 Taxonomy
- 4 Distribution and habitat
- 5 Ecology
- 6 Cultivation
- 7 Uses
- 8 Culture
- 9 See also
- 10 References
- 11 Bibliography
- 12 Additional resources
- 13 External links
Rhododendron is a genus of shrubs and small to (rarely) large trees, the smallest species growing to 10–100 cm (4–40 in) tall, and the largest, R. protistum var. giganteum, reported to 30 m (100 ft) tall. The leaves are spirally arranged; leaf size can range from 1–2 cm (0.4–0.8 in) to over 50 cm (20 in), exceptionally 100 cm (40 in) in R. sinogrande. They may be either evergreen or deciduous. In some species, the undersides of the leaves are covered with scales (lepidote) or hairs (indumentum). Some of the best known species are noted for their many clusters of large flowers. There are alpine species with small flowers and small leaves, and tropical species such as section Vireya that often grow as epiphytes. Species in this genus may be part of the heath complex in oak-heath forests in eastern North America.
They have frequently been divided based on the presence or absence of scales on the abaxial (lower) leaf surface (lepidote or elepidote). These scales, unique to subgenus Rhododendron, are modified hairs consisting of a polygonal scale attached by a stalk.
Rhododendron are characterised by having inflorescences with scarious (dry) perulae, a chromosome number of x=13, fruit that has a septicidal capsule, an ovary that is superior (or nearly so), stamens that have no appendages, and agglutinate (clumped) pollen.
Rhododendron is the largest genus in the family Ericaceae, with as many as 1,024 species, (though estimates vary from 850-1000) and is morphologically diverse. Consequently, the taxonomy has been historically complex.
Although Rhododendrons had been known since the description of Rhododendron hirsutum by Charles de l’Écluse (Clusius) in the sixteenth century, and were known to classical writers (Magor 1990), and referred to as Chamaerhododendron (low-growing rose tree), the genus was first formally described by Linnaeus in his Species Plantarum in 1753. He listed five species under Rhododendron (Rhododendron ferrugineum (type species), R. dauricum, R. hirsutum, R. chamaecistus (now Rhodothamnus chamaecistus (L.) Rchb.) and R. maximum). At that time he considered the then known six species of Azalea that he had described earlier in 1735 in his Systema Naturae as a separate genus.
Linnaeus’ six species of Azalea were Azalea indica, A. pontica, A. lutea, A. viscosa, A. lapponica and A. procumbens (now Kalmia procumbens), which he distinguished from Rhododendron by having five stamens, as opposed to ten. As new species of what are now considered Rhododendron were discovered, if they seemed to differ significantly from the type species they were assigned to separate genera. For instance Rhodora (Linnaeus 1763) for Rhododendron canadense, Vireya (Blume 1826) and Hymenanthes (Blume 1826) for Rhododendron metternichii, now R. degronianum. Meanwhile, other botanists such as Salisbury (1796) and Tate (1831) began to question the distinction between Azalea and Rhododendron, and finally in 1836, Azalea was incorporated into Rhododendron and the genus divided into eight sections. Of these Tsutsutsi (Tsutsusi), Pentanthera, Pogonanthum, Ponticum and Rhodora are still used, the other sections being Lepipherum, Booram, and Chamaecistus. This structure largely survived till recently (2004), following which the development of molecular phylogeny led to major re-examinations of traditional morphological classifications, although other authors such as Candolle, who described six sections, used slightly different numeration.
Soon, as more species became available in the nineteenth century so did a better understanding of the characteristics necessary for the major divisions. Chief amongst these were Maximovicz‘s Rhododendreae Asiae Orientali and Planchon. Maximovicz used flower bud position and its relationship with leaf buds to create eight “Sections”. Bentham and Hooker used a similar scheme, but called the divisions “Series”. It was not until 1893 that Koehne appreciated the significance of scaling and hence the separation of lepidote and elepidote species. The large number of species that were available by the early twentieth century prompted a new approach when Balfour introduced the concept of grouping species into series. The Species of Rhododendron referred to this series concept as the Balfourian system. That system continued up to modern times in Davidian’s four volume The Rhododendron Species.
The next major attempt at classification was by Sleumer who from 1934 began incorporating the Balfourian series into the older hierarchical structure of subgenera and sections, according to the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, culminating in 1949 with his “Ein System der Gattung Rhododendron L.”, and subsequent refinements. Most of the Balfourian series are represented by Sleumer as subsections, though some appear as sections or even subgenera. Sleumer based his system on the relationship of the flower buds to the leaf buds, habitat, flower structure, and whether the leaves were lepidote or non-lepidote. While Sleumer’s work was widely accepted, many in the United States and the United Kingdom continued to use the simpler Balfourian system of the Edinburgh group.
Sleumer’s system underwent many revisions by others, predominantly the Edinburgh group in their continuing Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh notes. Cullen of the Edinburgh group, placing more emphasis on the lepidote characteristics of the leaves, united all of the lepidote species into subgenus Rhododendron, including four of Sleumer’s subgenera (Rhododendron, Pseudoazalea, Pseudorhodorastrum, Rhodorastrum). In 1986 Philipson & Philipson raised two sections of subgenus Aleastrum (Mumeazalea, Candidastrum) to subgenera, while reducing genus Therorhodion to a subgenus of Rhododendron. In 1987 Spethmann, adding phytochemical features proposed a system with fifteen subgenera grouped into three ‘chorus’ subgenera.
A number of closely related genera had been included together with Rhododendron in a former tribe, Rhodoreae. These have been progressively incorporated into Rhododendron. Chamberlain and Rae moved the monotypic section Tsusiopsis together with the monotypic genus Tsusiophyllum into section Tsutsusi, while Kron & Judd reduced genus Ledum to a subsection of section Rhododendron. Then Judd & Kron moved two species (Rhododendron schlippenbachii, R. quinquefolium) from section Brachybachii subgenus Tsutsusi and two from section Rhodora subgenus Pentanthera (R. albrechtii, R. pentaphyllum) into section Sciadorhodion subgenus Pentanthera. Finally Chamberlain brought the various systems together in 1996, with 1,025 species divided into eight subgenera. For a comparison of the Sleumer and Chamberlain schemata see Table 1 of Goetsch (2005).
|Cladogram of genus Rhododendron
(Goetsch et al. 2005)
The era of molecular analysis rather than descriptive features can be dated to the work of Kurashige (1988) and Kron (1997) who used matK sequencing. Later Gao et al. (2002) used ITS sequences to determine a cladistic analysis. They confirmed that the genus Rhododendron was monophyletic, with subgenus Therorhodion in the basal position, consistent with the matK studies. Following publication of the studies of Goetsch et al. (2005) with RPB2, there began an ongoing realignment of species and groups within the genus, based on evolutionary relationships. Their work was more supportive of Sleumer’s original system than the later modifications introduced by Chamberlain et al..
The major finding of Goetsch and colleagues was that all species examined (except R. camtschaticum, subgenus Therorhodion) formed three major clades which they labelled A, B and C, with the subgenera Rhododendron and Hymenanthes nested within clades A and B as monophyletic groups respectively. By contrast subgenera Azaleastrum and Pentanthera were polyphyletic, while R. camtschaticum appeared as a sister to all other rhododendrons. The small polyphyletic subgenera Pentanthera and Azaleastrum were divided between two clades. The four sections of Pentanthera between clades B and C, with two each, while Azaleastrum had one section in each of A and C.
Thus subgenera Azaleastrum and Pentanthera needed to be dissassembled, and Rhododendron, Hymenanthes and Tsutsusi correspondingly expanded. In addition to the two separate genera included under Rhododendron by Chamberlain (Ledum, Tsusiophyllum), Goetsch et al.. added Menziesia (Clade C). Despite a degree of paraphyly, the subgenus Rhododendron was otherwise untouched with regard to its three sections but four other subgenera were eliminated and one new subgenus created, leaving a total of five subgenera in all, from eight in Chamberlain’s scheme. The discontinued subgenera are Pentanthera, Tsutsusi, Candidastrum and Mumeazalea, while a new subgenus was created by elevating subgenus Azaleastrum section Choniastrum to subgenus rank.
Subgenus Pentanthera (deciduous azaleas) with its four sections was dismembered by eliminating two sections and redistributing the other two between the existing subgenera in clades B (Hymenanthes) and C (Azaleastrum), although the name was retained in section Pentanthera (14 species) which was moved to subgenus Hymenanthes. Of the remaining three sections, monotypic Viscidula was discontinued by moving Rhododendron nipponicum to Tsutsusi (C), while Rhodora (2 species) was itself polyphyletic and was broken up by moving Rhododendron canadense to section Pentanthera (B) and Rhododendron vaseyi to section Sciadorhodion, which then became a new section of subgenus Azaleastrum (C).
Subgenus Tsutsusi (C) was reduced to section status retaining the name, and included in subgenus Azaleastrum. Of the three minor subgenera, all in C, two were discontinued. The single species of monotypic subgenus Candidastrum (Rhododendron albiflorum) was moved to subgenus Azaleastrum, section Sciadorhodion. Similarly the single species in monotypic subgenus Mumeazalea (Rhododendron semibarbatum) was placed in the new section Tsutsusi, subgenus Azaleastrum. Genus Menziesa (9 species) was also added to section Sciadorhodion. The remaining small subgenus Therorhodion with its two species was left intact. Thus two subgenera, Hymenanthes and Azaleastrum were expanded at the expense of four subgenera that were eliminated, although Azaleastrum lost one section (Choniastrum) as a new subgenus, since it was a distinct subclade in A. In all, Hymenanthes increased from one to two sections, while Azaleastrum, by losing one section and gaining two increased from two to three sections. (See schemata under Subgenera) (Table 1.)
|Chamberlain (1996)||Goetsch (2005)|
Subsequent research has supported the revision by Goetsch, although has largely concentrated on further defining the phylogeny within the subdivisions. In 2011 the two species of Diplarche were also added to Rhododendron, incertae sedis.
Terminology from the Sleumer (1949) system is frequently found in older literature, with five subgenera and is as follows;
- Subgenus Lepidorrhodium Koehne: Lepidotes. 3 sections
- Subgenus Eurhododendron Maxim.: Elipidotes.
- Subgenus Pseudanthodendron Sleumer: Deciduous azaleas. 3 sections
- Subgenus Anthodendron Rehder & Wilson: Evergreen azaleas. 3 sections
- Subgenus Azaleastrum Planch.: 4 sections
In the later traditional classification, attributed to Chamberlain (1996), and as used by horticulturalists and the American Rhododendron Society, Rhododendron has eight subgenera based on morphology, namely the presence of scales (lepidote), deciduousness of leaves, and the floral and vegetative branching patterns, after Sleumer (1980). These consist of four large and four small subgenera. The first two subgenera (Rhododendron and Hymenanthes) represent the species commonly considered as ‘Rhododendrons’. The next two smaller subgenera (Pentanthera and Tsutsusi) represent the ‘Azaleas’. The remaining four subgenera contain very few species. The largest of these is subgenus Rhododendron, containing nearly half of all known species and all of the lepidote species.
- Subgenus Rhododendron L.: Small leaf or lepidotes (scales on the underside of the leaves). 3 sections, 462 species, type species: Rhododendron ferrugineum.
- Subgenus Hymenanthes (Blume) K.Koch: Large leaf or elepidotes (without scales). 1 section, 224 species, type Rhododendron degronianum.
- Subgenus Pentanthera (G. Don) Pojarkova: Deciduous azaleas. 4 sections, 23 species, type Rhododendron luteum.
- Subgenus Tsutsusi (Sweet) Pojarkova: Evergreen azaleas. 2 sections, 80 species, type Rhododendron indicum.
- Subgenus Azaleastrum Planch.: 2 sections, 16 species, type Rhododendron ovatum.
- Subgenus Candidastrum Franch. : 1 species, Rhododendron albiflorum.
- Subgenus Mumeazalea (Sleumer) W.R. Philipson & M.N. Philipson: 1 species, Rhododendron semibarbatum.
- Subgenus Therorhodion (Maxim.) A. Gray: 2 species (Rhododendron camtschaticum, Rhododendron redowskianun).
For a comparison of the Sleumer and Chamberlain systems, see Goetsch et al. (2005) Table 1.
This division was based on a number of what were thought to be key morphological characteristics. These included the position of the inflorescence buds (terminal or lateral), whether lepidote or elepidote, deciduousness of leaves, and whether new foliage was derived from axils from previous year’s shoots or the lowest scaly leaves (Table 2.).
|Inflorescence buds||Leaf scales||Leaf shoots||Leaves||Subgenus||Section|
- Subgenus Rhododendron L.: Small leaf or lepidotes (scales on the underside of the leaves). 3 sections, about 400 species, type species: Rhododendron ferrugineum.
- Subgenus Choniastrum Franch. : 11 species
- Subgenus Hymenanthes (Blume) K.Koch: Large leaf or elepidotes (without scales), including deciduous azaleas. 2 sections, about 140-225 species, type Rhododendron degronianum.
- Subgenus Azaleastrum Planch.: Evergreen azaleas. 3 sections, about 120 species, type Rhododendron ovatum.
- Subgenus Therorhodion (Maxim.) A. Gray: 2 species (Rhododendron camtschaticum, Rhododendron redowskianun).
Sections and subsections
The larger subgenera are further subdivided into sections and subsections Some subgenera contain only a single section, and some sections only a single subsection. Shown here is the traditional classification, with species number after Chamberlain (1996), but this scheme is undergoing constant revision. Revisions by Goetsch et al. (2005) and by Craven et al. (2008) shown in (parenthetical italics). Older ranks such as Series (groups of species) are no longer used but may be found in the literature, but the American Rhododendron Society still uses a similar device, called Alliances
- Subgenus Rhododendron L. (3 sections, 462 species: increased to five sections in 2008)
- (Discovereya (Sleumer) Argent, raised from Vireya)
- Pogonathum Aitch. & Hemsl. (13 species; Himalaya and adjacent mountains)
- (Pseudovireya (C.B.Clarke) Argent, raised from Vireya)
- Rhododendron L. (149 species in 25 subsections; temperate to subarctic Northern Hemisphere)
- Vireya (Blume) Copel.f. (300 species in 2 subsections; tropical southeast Asia, Australasia. At one time considered separate subgenus)
- Subgenus Hymenanthes (Blume) K.Koch (1 section, 224 species) (Increased to two sections)
- Ponticum G. Don (24 subsections)
- (Pentanthera (G. Don) Pojarkova (2 subsections) new section, moved from subgenus Pentanthera)
- Subgenus Pentanthera (G. Don) Pojarkova (4 sections, 23 species) (Discontinued)
- Pentanthera (G. Don) Pojarkova (2 subsections) (Moved to subgenus Hymenanthes)
- Rhodora (L.) G. Don (2 species; Rhododendron canadense, Rhododendron vaseyi) (Discontinued, redistributed)
- Sciadorhodion Rehder & Wilson (4 species) (Moved to subgenus Azaleastrum)
- Viscidula Matsum. & Nakai (1 species; Rhododendron nipponicum) (Discontinued, added to section Tsutsusi, subgenus Azaleastrum)
- Subgenus Tsutsusi (Sweet) Pojarkova (2 sections, 80 species) (Discontinued, reduced to section and moved to subgenus Azaleastrum)
- Subgenus Azaleastrum Planch. (2 sections, 16 species) (Increased to three sections)
- Azaleastrum Planch. (5 species)
- (Choniastrum Franch. (11 species) (Raised to subgenus))
- (Sciadorhodion Rehder & Wilson (4 species) (Moved from subgenus Pentanthera))
- (Tsutsusi (Sweet) Pojarkova (reduced from subgenus))
- Subgenus Candidastrum Franch. (1 species: Rhododendron albiflorum) (Discontinued, moved to section Sciadorhodion, subgenus Azaleastrum)
- Subgenus Mumeazalea (Sleumer) W.R. Philipson & M.N. Philipson (1 species: Rhododendron semibarbatum) (Discontinued, moved to section Tsutsusi, subgenus Azaleastrum)
- Subgenus Therorhodion A. Gray (2 species)
- (Subgenus Choniastrum Franch. (11 species))
Distribution and habitat
Species of the genus Rhododendron are widely distributed between latitudes 80°N and 20°S and are native to areas from North America to Europe, Russia, and Asia, and from Greenland to Queensland, Australia and the Solomon Islands. The centres of diversity are in the Himalayas and Malaysia, with the greatest species diversity in the Sino-Himalayan region, Southwest China and northern Burma, from Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Nepal, Sikkim, Nagaland to northwestern Yunnan and western Sichuan and southeastern Tibet. Other significant areas of diversity are in the mountains of Korea, Japan and Taiwan. More than 90% of Rhododendron sensu Chamberlain belong to the Asian subgenera Rhododendron, Hymenanthes and section Tsutsusi. Of the first two of these, the species are predominantly found in the area of the Himalayas and Southwest China (Sino-Himalayan Region).
The 300 tropical species within the Vireya section of subgenus Rhododendron occupy the Malay archipelago from their presumed Southeast Asian origin to Northern Australia, with 55 known species in Borneo and 164 in New Guinea. The species in New Guinea are native to subalpine moist grasslands at around 3,000 metres above sea level in the Central Highlands. Subgenera Rhododendron and Hymenanthes, together with section Pentanthera of subgenus Pentanthera are also represented to a lesser degree in the Mountainous areas of North America and Western Eurasia. Subgenus Tsutsusi is found in the maritime regions of East Asia (Japan, Korea, Taiwan, East China), but not in North America or Eurasia.
Rhododendron ponticum has become invasive in Ireland and the United Kingdom. It is an introduced species, spreading in woodland areas and replacing the natural understory. R. ponticum is difficult to eradicate, as its roots can make new shoots.
A number of insects either target rhododendrons or will opportunistically attack them. Rhododendron borers and various weevils are major pests of rhododendrons, and many caterpillars will preferentially devour them.
Rhododendron bud blast, a fungal condition that causes buds to turn brown and dry, and not open, is caused by the fungus Pycnostysanus azaleae, which may be brought to the plant by the rhododendron leafhopper, Graphocephala fennahi.:562
In addition, rhododendrons can easily be suffocated by other plants or evergreen trees that grow up around them and block sunlight.
Both species and hybrid rhododendrons (including azaleas) are used extensively as ornamental plants in landscaping in many parts of the world, including both temperate and subtemperate regions. Many species and cultivars are grown commercially for the nursery trade.
Rhododendrons can be propagated by air layering or stem cuttings.:540–541 They can self-propagate by sending up shoots from the roots. Sometimes an attached branch that has drooped to the ground will root in damp mulch, and the resulting rooted plant then can be cut off the parent rhododendron.
Rhododendrons are often valued in landscaping for their structure, size, flowers, and the fact that many of them are evergreen. Azaleas are frequently used around foundations and occasionally as hedges, and many larger-leafed rhododendrons lend themselves well to more informal plantings and woodland gardens, or as specimen plants. In some areas, larger rhododendrons can be pruned to encourage more tree-like form, with some species such as Rhododendron arboreum and R. falconeri eventually growing to 10–15 m or more tall.
Rhododendrons are grown commercially in many areas for sale, and are occasionally collected in the wild, a practice now rare in most areas. Larger commercial growers often ship long distances; in the United States, most of them are on the west coast (Oregon, Washington state and California). Large-scale commercial growing often selects for different characteristics than hobbyist growers might want, such as resistance to root rot when overwatered, ability to be forced into budding early, ease of rooting or other propagation, and saleability.
In the Indian state of Himachal Pradesh, rhododendron flowers have been used for some time to make popular fruit and flower wines. The industry is promoted by the state government with tax benefits, looking to promote this industry as a full-fledged subclass of its economy.
- Evergreen rhododendrons – large group of evergreen shrubs that vary greatly in size. Most rhododendron flowers are bell-shaped and have 10 stamens.
- Vireya (Malesian) rhododendrons: epiphytic tender shrubs
- Azaleas – group of shrubs which have smaller and thinner leaves than evergreen rhododendrons. They are generally medium-sized shrubs with smaller funnel-shaped flowers that usually have 5 stamens:
- Deciduous hybrid azaleas:
- Exbury hybrids – derived from the Knap Hill hybrids, developed by Lionel de Rothschild at the Exbury Estate in England.
- Ghent (Gandavense) hybrids – Belgian raised
- Knap Hill hybrids – developed by Anthony Waterer at the Knap Hill Nursery in England.
- Mollis hybrids – Dutch and Belgian raised
- New Zealand Ilam hybrids – derived from Knap Hill/Exbury hybrids
- Occidentale hybrids – English raised
- Rustica Flore Pleno hybrids – sweet-scented, double-flowered
- Evergreen hybrid azaleas:
- Gable hybrids – raised by Joseph B. Gable in Pennsylvania.
- Glenn Dale hybrids – US raised complex hybrids
- Indian (Indica) hybrids – mostly of Belgian origin
- Kaempferi hybrids – Dutch raised
- Kurume hybrids – Japanese raised
- Kyushu hybrids – very hardy Japanese azaleas (to -30 °C)
- Oldhamii hybrids – dwarf hybrids raised at Exbury, England
- Satsuki hybrids – Japanese raised, originally for bonsai
- Shammarello hybrids – raised in northern Ohio
- Vuyk (Vuykiana) hybrids – raised in the Netherlands
- Deciduous hybrid azaleas:
- Azaleodendrons – semi-evergreen hybrids between deciduous azaleas and rhododendrons
Planting and care
Like other ericaceous plants, most rhododendrons prefer acid soils with a pH of roughly 4.5-5.5; some tropical Vireyas and a few other rhododendron species grow as epiphytes and require a planting mix similar to orchids. Rhododendrons have fibrous roots and prefer well-drained soils high in organic material. In areas with poorly drained or alkaline soils, rhododendrons are often grown in raised beds using media such as composted pine bark. Mulching and careful watering are important, especially before the plant is established.
A new calcium-tolerant stock of rhododendrons (trademarked as ‘Inkarho’) has been exhibited at the RHS Chelsea Flower Show in London (2011). Individual hybrids of rhododendrons have been grafted on to a rootstock on a single rhododendron plant that was found growing in a chalk quarry. The rootstock is able to grow in calcium-rich soil up to a pH of 7.5.
Rhododendrons are extensively hybridized in cultivation, and natural hybrids often occur in areas where species ranges overlap. There are over 28,000 cultivars of Rhododendron in the International Rhododendron Registry held by the Royal Horticultural Society. Most have been bred for their flowers, but a few are of garden interest because of ornamental leaves and some for ornamental bark or stems. Some hybrids have fragrant flowers—such as the Loderi hybrids, created by crossing Rhododendron fortunei and R. griffithianum. Other examples include the PJM hybrids, formed from a cross between Rhododendron carolinianum and R. dauricum, and named after Peter J. Mezitt of Weston Nurseries, Massachusetts.
Rhododendron species have long been used in traditional medicine. Animal studies and in vitro research has identified possible anti-inflammatory and hepatoprotective activities which may be due to the antioxidant effects of flavonoids or other phenolic compounds and saponins the plant contains. Xiong et al. have found that the root of the plant is able to reduce the activity of NF-κB in rats.
Some species of rhododendron are poisonous to grazing animals because of a toxin called grayanotoxin in their pollen and nectar. People have been known to become ill from eating honey made by bees feeding on rhododendron and azalea flowers. Xenophon described the odd behaviour of Greek soldiers after having consumed honey in a village surrounded by Rhododendron ponticum during the march of the Ten Thousand in 401 BC. Pompey‘s soldiers reportedly suffered lethal casualties following the consumption of honey made from Rhododendron deliberately left behind by Pontic forces in 67 BC during the Third Mithridatic War. Later, it was recognized that honey resulting from these plants has a slightly hallucinogenic and laxative effect. The suspect rhododendrons are Rhododendron ponticum and Rhododendron luteum (formerly Azalea pontica), both found in northern Asia Minor. Eleven similar cases have been documented in Istanbul, Turkey during the 1980s. Rhododendron is extremely toxic to horses, with some animals dying within a few hours of ingesting the plant, although most horses tend to avoid it if they have access to good forage. The effects of R. ponticum was mentioned in the 2009 film Sherlock Holmes as a proposed way to arrange a fake execution. It was also mentioned in the third episode of Season 2 of BBC’s Sherlock, and has been speculated to have been a part of Sherlock’s fake death scheme.
Rhododendron arboreum (lali guransh) is the national flower of Nepal. R. ponticum is the state flower of Indian-administered Kashmir and Pakistan-controlled Kashmir. Rhododendron niveum is the state tree of Sikkim in India. Rhododendron arboreum is also the state tree of the state of Uttarakhand, India. Pink Rhododendron (Rhododendron campanulatum) is the State Flower of Himachal Pradesh, India. Rhododendron is also the state flower of Nagaland, the 16th state of the Indian Union.
The nineteenth-century American poet and essayist Ralph Waldo Emerson in 1834 wrote a poem titled “The Rhodora, On Being Asked, Whence Is the Flower”,
In Joyce’s Ulysses, rhododendrons play an important role in Leopold and Molly’s early courtship: Molly remembers them in her soliloquy – “the sun shines for you he said the day we were lying among the rhododendrons on Howth head in the grey tweed suit and his straw hat the day I got him to propose to me”. Jasper Fforde a British author, also uses rhododendron as a motif throughout many of his published books. See Thursday Next series, and Shades of Grey.
Amongst the Zomi tribes in India and Myanmar, “Rhododendrons” called “Ngeisok” is used in a poetic manner to signify a lady.
In Daphne Du Maurier‘s novel Rebecca, the character of Rebecca is associated with “blood red” rhododendrons throughout the novel, perhaps due to the toxic roots of the plant mirroring the poisonous character of Rebecca. On the other hand, azaleas (a type of rhododendron) represent the second Mrs. De Winter.
The rhododendron is the national flower of Nepal, where the flower is considered edible and enjoyed for its sour taste. The pickled flower can last for months and the flower juice is also marketed.:51 The flower, fresh or dried, is added to fish curry in the belief that it will soften the bones.:53 The juice of rhododendron flower is used to make a squash called burans (named after the flower) in the hilly regions of Uttarakhand. It is admired for its distinctive flavor and color.
- Rhododendron tomentosum (Northern Labrador tea, previously Ledum palustre)
- Rhododendron groenlandicum, (Bog Labrador tea, previously Ledum groenlandicum or Ledum latifolium)
- Rhododendron neoglandulosum, (Western Labrador tea, or trapper’s tea, previously Ledum glandulosum)
In the UK the forerunner of the Rhododendron, Camellia and Magnolia Group (RCMG), The Rhododendron Society was founded in 1916. while in Scotland species are being conserved by the Rhododendron Species Conservation Group.
- List of Award of Garden Merit rhododendrons
- List of Rhododendron diseases
- List of Rhododendron species
- List of Sections in Subgenus Rhododendron
- Linnaeus, C. (1753). “Rhododendron”. Species Plantarum. Tomus I. Stockholm: Laurentii Salvii. p. 392. Retrieved June 15, 2014.
- Goetsch, Eckert & Hall (2005).
- Harper, Douglas. “rhododendron”. Online Etymology Dictionary.
- ῥόδον δένδρον. Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert; A Greek–English Lexicon at the Perseus Project
- Turner Jr., R.J. & Wasson, Ernie, eds. (1997). Botanica: The Illustrated A-Z Of Over 10,000 Garden Plants and How to Cultivate Them. p. 742.
- “Big Tree Rhododendron”. Global Trees Campaign.
- Colombel, Marc. “Rhododendron protistum var. giganteum“.
- “Introduction”. www.dcr.virginia.gov.
- Schafale, M. P. and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina: third approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation.
- Brown et al. (2006).
- “Sorting out the Genus Rhododendron: A Taxonomic Overview of this Large Complex of Species”. University of California Botanical Garden at Berkeley. Archived from the original on 2014-07-14.
- Fayaz (2012), p. 3.
- Linnaeus, C. (1754). Genera Plantarum (5th ed.). Stockholm: Laurentii Salvii. p. 185. Retrieved Oct 1, 2017.
- Linnaeus, C. (1753). “Azalea”. Species Plantarum. Tomus I. Stockholm: Laurentii Salvii. p. 150. Retrieved June 15, 2014.
- Andrews, Charles. “What is an Azalea?”. American Rhododendron Society (Azalea Chapter).
- Spady, Herbert A. (Fall 1981). “GROPING FOR GROUPING: Rhododendron Taxonomy”. The Quarterly Bulletin of the American Rhododendron Society. 35 (4).
- Callard, Chris (1998–2015). “The History of Vireya Rhododendron Culture”. vireya.net. Retrieved 2017-09-28.
- Salisbury, R.A. (1796). Prodromus Stirpium in horto ad Chapel Allerton (in Latin). London. p. 286.
- Patricia E C Croot, ed. (2004). “Economic history: Farm-gardening and market gardening”. A History of the County of Middlesex: Volume 12, Chelsea. London: British History Online. pp. 150–155.
- Don, G. (1834). General History of Dichlamydious Plants. iii. London: J.G. and F. Rivington. p. 843.
- Candolle (1838).
- Maximowicz, C.J. (1870). Rhododendreae Asiae Orientalis [Rhododendreae East Asia] (in Latin). St. Pétersbourg.
- JIN et al. (2010).
- Bentham, G. & Hooker, J.D. (1876). Genera plantarum ad exemplaria imprimis in herbariis kewensibus servata definita. Vol. 2 Part II (in Latin). London: Reeve & Co. Retrieved 10 July 2014.
- Stevenson, J.B., ed. (1930). The Species of Rhododendron. Edinburgh: The Rhododendron Society.
- Sleumer, H (1949). “Ein System der Gattung Rhododendron L.”. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 74: 511–553.
- Sleumer, H (1966). “Ericaceae”. In CGGJ van Steenis. Flora Malesiana. Series I, Spermatophyta (vol. 6 pt. 4). Djakarta: Noordhoff-Kolff. pp. 469–656. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.40744.
- Sleumer, H (1980). “Past and present taxonomic systems of Rhododendron based on macromorphological characters”. In Luteyn, J.L. & O’Brien, M.E. Contributions Toward a Classification of Rhododendron: Proceedings of the International Rhododendron Conference. International Rhododendron Conference (The New York Botanical Garden, May 15–17, 1978). New York: New York Botanical Garden Press. pp. 19–26. ISBN 978-0-89327-221-0.
- Cullen, J. (1980). “A revision of Rhododendron I. Subgenus Rhododendron sections Rhododendron and Pogonanthum”. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. 39 (1). ISSN 0080-4274.
- Philipson, W.R.; Philipson, M.N. (1986). “A revision of Rhododendron III. Subgenera Azaleastrum, Mumeazalea, Candidastrum and Therorhodion”. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. 44: 1–23. ISSN 0080-4274.
- Spethmann, W (1987). “A new infrageneric classification and phylogenetic trends in the genus Rhododendron (Ericaceae)”. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 157 (1–2): 9–31. doi:10.1007/BF00939178. ISSN 1615-6110.
- Stevens, PF (1971). “A classification of the Ericaceae: subfamilies and tribes”. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 64 (1): 1–53. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.1971.tb02133.x.
- Chamberlain & Rae (1990).
- Kron, K. A.; Judd, W. S. (1990). “Phylogenetic relationships within the Rhodoreae (Ericaceae) with specific comments on the placement of Ledum“. Systematic Botany. 15 (1): 57–68. doi:10.2307/2419016. JSTOR 2419016.
- Judd, W. S.; Kron, K. A. (1995). “A revision of Rhododendron. VI. Subgenus Pentanthera (sections Sciadorhodion, Rhodora, and Viscidula)”. Edinburgh Journal of Botany. 52 (1): 1–54. doi:10.1017/s0960428600001906.
- Chamberlain, DF; Hyam, R; Argent, G; Fairweather, G; Walter, KS (1996). The genus Rhododendron: its classification and synonymy. Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. ISBN 978-1-872291-66-6. Archived from the original on 2016-03-04.
- Cullen (2005).
- GAO Lian-Ming; LI De-Zhu; ZHANG Chang-Qin; YANG Jun-Bo (2002). “Infrageneric and Sectional Relationships in the Genus Rhododendron (Ericaceae) Inferred from ITS Sequence Data” (PDF). Am Botanica Sinica. 44 (11): 1351–1356.
- Goetsch, Loretta A.; Eckert, Andrew J.; Hall, Benjamin D. (2005). “Excerpts from and comments on a paper published by: Loretta Goetsch, Andrew Eckert and Benjamin Hall, University of Washington”. Fraser South Rhododendron Society. Archived from the original on 2013-02-27. 2005 Annual ARS Convention
- Craven et al. (2008).
- Craven (2011).
- Genus Rhododendron Taxonomic Tree.
- Irving, E.; R. Hebda (1993). “Concerning the Origin and Distribution of Rhododendrons”. Journal of the American Rhododendron Society. American Rhododendron Society. Retrieved 4 November 2012.
- Argent (2006).
- Bramhill, Nick (18 July 2014). “Dramatic rescue of couple trapped in rhododendron forest”. Irish Central.
- Simons, Paul (16 April 2017). “A spectacular thug is out of control”. The Guardian. Retrieved 2017-10-02.
- Hoitink, Harry A. J.; Nameth, Stephen; Chatfield, Jim. “Maintaining Healthy Rhododendrons and Azaleas in the Landscape”. ohioline.ag.ohio-state.edu. Archived from the original on 2013-06-05. Retrieved 2013-02-26.
- Brickell, Christopher; McDonald, Elvin, eds. (1993). The American Horticultural Society Encyclopedia of Gardening. NY: Dorling Kindersley Publishing. ISBN 978-1564582911.
- Huxley, A.; Griffiths, M.; Levy, Margot, eds. (1992). New RHS Dictionary of Gardening. London: Macmillan. ISBN 978-0333474945.
- Cox, P.A. (1993). The Cultivation of Rhododendrons. London: B.T. Batsford. pp. 80–81. ISBN 978-0-7134-5630-1.
- Zwitch, Randy. “India has a ‘wine country’? Yes, it does!”. The-fuga-experience.com. Archived from the original on 12 April 2010.
- Brickell, Christopher, ed. (2008). RHS A-Z Encyclopedia of Garden Plants. United Kingdom: Penguin Books. p. 1136. ISBN 978-1405332965.
- Callard, Chris (1998–2015). “Vireya Rhododendrons – Welcome”. vireya.net. Retrieved 2013-02-26.
- “Deciduous Azaleas”. Rhodyman.net. Retrieved 2013-02-26.
- Hyatt, Donald W. “My Fascination with Knap Hill Azaleas”. Retrieved 2017-09-24.
- Hyatt, Donald W. “Exbury Gardens”. Retrieved 2017-10-21.
- Skinner, Archie (Summer 1984). “Rescuing the Ghent and Rustica Flore Pleno Azaleas”. Journal American Rhododendron Society. 38 (3). Retrieved 2013-02-26.
- Living, L.C. (January 1960). “Mollis Azaleas”. The Quarterly Bulletin of the American Rhododendron Society. 14 (1). Retrieved 2013-02-26.
- Hyatt, Donald W. “The Rhododendron Legacy of Joe Gable”. Retrieved 2017-09-24.
- Baldsiefen, Warren (October 1955). “Shammarello’s Wonderland”. The Quarterly Bulletin of the American Rhododendron Society. 9 (4). Retrieved 2013-02-26.
- Nosal, Mathew A. (Winter 1979). “The Vuykiana Azaleas”. The Quarterly Bulletin of the American Rhododendron Society. 33 (1). Retrieved 2013-02-26.
- “Soil information for planting rhododendrons”. American Rhododendron Society. Retrieved 2013-02-26.
- “Lime Tolerant Rhododendrons”. Millais Nurseries. Retrieved 2017-10-02.
- Guinness, Bunny (17 Nov 2009). “The new lime-tolerant rhododendrons”. The Telegraph. Retrieved 2013-02-26.
- Francis, Richard (25 January 2006). “Fragrant Rhododendrons”. Wildeel.com. Archived from the original on 2015-07-06. Retrieved 11 March 2015.
- Davidian, Vol. II, plate 44 & 45.
- Brand, Mark H. “Rhododendron ‘PJM’ Hybrids”. UConn Plant Database. Archived from the original on 2014-06-19.
- Popescu, R; Kopp, B (May 2013). “The genus Rhododendron: an ethnopharmacological and toxicological review”. J Ethnopharmacol. 147 (1): 42–62. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2013.02.022. PMID 23454683.
- Bhattacharyya, Debjyoti (2011). “Rhododendron Species and Their Uses with Special Reference to Himalayas – A Review”. Assam University Journal of Science & Technology: Biological and Environmental Sciences. 7 (1): 161–167. ISSN 0975-2773.
- Agarwal, S.S.; Sharma Kalpana (1988). “Anti-inflammatory activity of flowers of Rhododendron arboreum (SMITH) in rat’s hind paw oedema induced by various phlogistic agents”. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 20 (2): 86–89.
- Xiong, Jing; Zhu, Zhonghua; Liu, Jianshe; Wang, Yang (January 2009). “The effect of root of rhododendron on the activation of NF-κB in a chronic glomerulonephritis rat model”. Journal of Nanjing Medical University. 23 (1): 73–78. doi:10.1016/S1007-4376(09)60031-9.
- “Grayanotoxins” (PDF). Bad Bug Book, Handbook of Foodborne Pathogenic Microorganisms and Natural Toxins (2nd ed.). Food and Drug Administration. 2012. Retrieved 2017-10-03.
- Nurhayat Sütlüpmar; Afife Mat & Yurdagül Satganoglu (February 1993). “Poisoning by toxic honey in Turkey”. Archives of Toxicology. 67 (2): 148–150. doi:10.1007/BF01973687. PMID 8481104.
- Captain Skellett (27 December 2009). “Rhododendron Poison – Truth behind the science of Sherlock Holmes”. A Schooner of Science. Retrieved 2013-02-26.
- “Language of Flowers – Flower Meanings and Flower Sentiments”. www.languageofflowers.com. Retrieved 2016-11-26.
- Fforde, Jasper (26 July 2005). Something rotten. ISBN 978-0-14-303541-1.
- Jasper Fforde. “Shades of Grey – An Interview with Jasper Fforde about Shades of Grey”. Jasperfforde.com. Retrieved 2013-02-26.
- Regmi, Puskal Prasad (1982). An introduction to Nepalese food plants. Royal Nepal Academy.
- Chauhan, Narain Singh (1999). Medicinal and Aromatic Plants of Himachal Pradesh. Indus Publishing. p. 355. ISBN 9788173870989.
- “Centenary – Background”. Rhododendron, Camellia and Magnolia Group. Archived from the original on 2016-09-12. Retrieved 26 May 2016.
- John M. Hammond. “Conservation of Rhododendron Species and their historic Gardens”. RSCG. Retrieved 2 Oct 2017.
Books and book chapters
- A. P. de Candolle (1838). “Rhododendron”. Prodromus systemati naturalis regni vegetabilis sive enumeratio contracta ordinum, generum specierumque plantarum huc usque cognitarum, juxta methodi naturalis normas digesta (in Latin). Volume 7. Paris: Treuttel et Würtz. pp. 719–728. (also available online at Gallica)
- Sweet, Robert (1838). The British Flower Garden. The Two Series. Vol. I. Drawings by E.D. Smith. London: James Ridgway & Sons.
- Hooker, Joseph Dalton (1849). Hooker, William Jackson, ed. The Rhododendrons of Sikkim-Himalaya: being an account, botanical and geographical, of the rhododendrons recently discovered in the mountains of eastern Himalaya, from drawings and descriptions made on the spot, during a government botanical mission to that country (2nd ed.). London: Reeve, Benham, and Reeve. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.11178.
- Luteyn, James Leonard & O’Brien, Mary E., eds. (1980). Contributions Toward a Classification of Rhododendron: Proceedings of the International Rhododendron Conference. International Rhododendron Conference (The New York Botanical Garden, May 15–17, 1978). New York: New York Botanical Garden Press. ISBN 978-0-89327-221-0.
- Davidian, H.H. (1982–1995). The Rhododendron Species. Portland, Oregon: Timber Press. In four volumes: Vol. I. Lepidotes ISBN 0-917304-71-3, Vol. II. Elepidotes. Arboreum-Lacteum ISBN 0-88192-109-2, Vol. III. Elepidotes Continued, Neriiflorum-Thomsonii, Azaleastrum and Camtschaticum ISBN 0-88192-168-8, Vol. IV. Azaleas ISBN 0-88192-311-7.
- Cox, Peter A. & Cox, Kenneth N. E. (1997). The Encyclopedia of Rhododendron Species. Glendoick Publishing. ISBN 978-0-9530533-0-8..
- Cullen, James (2005). Hardy Rhododendron Species: A Guide To Identification. Timber Press. ISBN 978-0881927238.
- Blazich, Frank A. & Rowe, D. Bradley (July 2008). “Rhododendron L., rhododendron and azalea” (PDF). In Bonner, Franklin T. & Karrfalt, Robert P. The Woody Plant Seed Manual (PDF). Agr. Hdbk. 727. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. Agr. For. Serv. pp. 943–951.
- Black, Michael (October 1969). “Historical Survey of Rhododendron Collecting With Emphasis on its Close Associations with Horticulture”. The Quarterly Bulletin of the American Rhododendron Society. 23 (4).
- Magor, Walter (Fall 1990). “A History of Rhododendrons”. Journal American Rhododendron Society. 44 (4).
- Goetsch, Loretta A.; Eckert, Andrew J.; Hall, Benjamin D. (July–September 2005). “The molecular systematics of Rhododendron (Ericaceae): a phylogeny based upon RPB2 gene sequences”. Systematic Botany. 30 (3): 616–626. doi:10.1600/0363644054782170.
- Wilson, EH; Rehder, A (1921). A Monograph of Azaleas; Rhododendron Subgenus Anthodendron. Publications of the Arnold Aboretum, no. 9. Cambridge: University Press.
- Creech, John L. (1955). “An Embryological Study in the Rhododendron Subgenus Anthodendron Endl”. Botanical Gazette. 116 (3): 234–243. doi:10.1086/335866. JSTOR 2473343.
- Chamberlain, D.F. & Rae, S.J. (1990). “A revision of Rhododendron. IV. Subgenus Tsutsusi“. Edinburgh Journal of Botany. 47 (2): 89–200. doi:10.1017/S096042860000319X.
- Powell, E. Ann; Kron, Kathleen A (2004). “Molecular systematics of Rhododendron subgenus Tsutsusi (Rhodoreae, Ericoideae, Ericaceae)”. Botany 2004. Abstract ID:147.
- Kron, K.A. & Powell, E.A. (March 2009). “Molecular systematics of Rhododendron subgenus Tsutsusi (Rhodoreae, Ericoideae, Ericaceae)”. Edinburgh Journal of Botany. 66 (1): 81–95. doi:10.1017/S0960428609005071.
- ZHANG Yue-Jiao; JIN Xiao-Feng; DING Bing-Yang; ZHU Jing-Ping (March 2009). “Pollen morphology of Rhododendron subgen. Tsutsusi and its systematic implications”. Journal of Systematics and Evolution. 47 (2): 123–138. doi:10.1111/j.1759-6831.2009.00011.x.
- JIN Xiao-Feng; DING Bing-Yang; ZHANG Yue-Jiao; HONG De-Yuan (2010). “A Taxonomic Revision Of Rhododendron subg. Tsutsusi sect. Brachycalyx (Ericaceae)”. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 97 (2): 163–190. doi:10.3417/2007139.
- Sleumer, Hermann Otto (1966). An account of rhododendron in Malesia. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.. A reprint from Flora Malesiana ser. I, vol. 6, part 4. Pages 473 through 674.
- Leach, David G. (Winter 1978). “The Discovery of the Malaysian Rhododendrons”. The Quarterly Bulletin of the American Rhododendron Society. 32 (1).
- Argent, G. (2006). Rhododendrons of subgenus Vireya. Royal Horticultural Society. ISBN 978-1-902896-61-8.
- Brown, Gillian K.; Craven, Lyn A.; Udovicic, Frank; Ladiges, Pauline Y. (August 2006). “Phylogenetic relationships of Rhododendron section Vireya (Ericaceae) inferred from the ITS nrDNA region” (PDF). Australian Systematic Botany. 19 (4): 329–342. doi:10.1071/SB05019. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-07-14.
- Hall, B.D.; Craven, L.A. & Goetsch, L.A. (2006). “The Taxonomy of Subsection Pseudovireya: Two distinctly different taxa within subsection Pseudovireya and their Relation to the Rooting of section Vireya within subgenus Rhododendron“. Rhododendron Species. 1: 91–97. Yearbook of the Rhododendron Species Foundation, Federal Way, WA.
- Craven, L.A.; Goetsch, L.A.; Hall, B.D.; Brown, G.K. (2008). “Classification of the Vireya group of Rhododendron (Ericaceae)”. Blumea – Biodiversity, Evolution and Biogeography of Plants. 53 (2): 435–442. doi:10.3767/000651908X608070.
- Goetsch, L.A.; Craven, L.A.; Hall, B.D. (2011). “Major speciation accompanied the dispersal of Vireya Rhododendrons (Ericaceae, Rhododendron sect. Schistanthe) through the Malayan archipelago: Evidence from nuclear gene sequences”. Taxon. 60 (4): 1015–1028.
- Adams, Peter (Fall 2012). “Evolution, Adaptive Radiation and Vireya Rhododendrons – Part I” (PDF). Journal American Rhododendron Society: 201–203.
- Adams, Peter (Spring 2013). “Evolution, Adaptive Radiation and Vireya Rhododendrons – Part II” (PDF). Journal American Rhododendron Society: 74–76.
- Fayaz, A. (2012). Biodiversity of the Vireya group of Rhododendron L. (Ericaceae) collections in New Zealand and their potential contribution to international conservation (Ph.D.). Turitea, New Zealand: Massey University. Retrieved 2017-09-26.
- Craven, L.A. (April 2011). “Diplarche and Menziesia transferred to Rhododendron (Ericaceae)”. Blumea – Biodiversity, Evolution and Biogeography of Plants. 56 (1): 33–35. doi:10.3767/000651911X568594.
Records of the Rhododendron Society of America reside at the Albert and Shirley Small Special Collections Library at the University of Virginia.
- History of Rhododendron Discovery & Culture
- Rhododendrons from Turkey, Anatolia
- Danish Genebank Rhododendron
- German Genebank Rhododendron
- Description of damage caused by Rhododendrons in the UK
- Information on rhododendrons at the Ericaceae web pages of Dr. Kron at Wake Forest University.
- Information on Vireyas
- Information+photos of hybrids and species
- Information on Rhododendrons by Marc Colombel, founder of the Société Bretonne du Rhododendron.
- Extensive information on rhododendron species: the history of their discovery, botanical details, toxicity, classification, cultural conditions, care for common problems, and suggestions for companion plants by Steve Henning.
- History of Rhododendrons
- Rhododendron in botanical garden Pruhonice-Czech republic
- USDA Plants Database: Rhododendron
- ITIS Report: Rhododendron
- American Rhododendron Society
- The Quarterly Bulletin of the American Rhododendron Society 1947-1981
- Journal of the American Rhododendron Society (JARS) 1982-
- “Genus Rhododendron Taxonomic Tree”. American Rhododendron Society. Information Source: Cox, Peter A. & Cox, Kenneth N. E. (1997). The Encyclopedia of Rhododendron Species. Glendoick Publishing. ISBN 978-0-9530533-0-8..
- The Rhododendron, Camellia & Magnolia Group of the Royal Horticultural Society
- Rhododendron Species Foundation and Botanical Garden
- Société Finlandaise du Rhododendron
- Australian Rhododendron Society
- German Rhododendron Society
- New Zealand Rhododendron Association
- Danish Rhododendron Society
- Fraser South Rhododendron Society
- Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh: Rhododendrons at the four Gardens
- National Rhododendron Gardens Melbourne Australia