|Common sea buckthorn shrub|
Hippophae rhamnoides, also known as sea-buckthorn:277 is a species of flowering plant in the family Elaeagnaceae, native to the cold-temperate regions of Europe and Asia. It is a spiny deciduous shrub. The plant is used in the food and cosmetics industries, in traditional medicine, as animal fodder, and for ecological purposes.
- 1 Description and biology
- 2 Taxonomy
- 3 Distribution
- 4 Composition
- 5 Uses
- 6 Cultivation
- 7 Interactions
- 8 References
- 9 External links
Description and biology
H. rhamnoides is a hardy, deciduous or evergreen shrub that can grow between 2 and 4 m high (between 7 and 13 ft). It has a rough, brown or black bark and a thick, grayish-green crown. The leaves are alternate, narrow and lanceolate, with silvery-green upper faces. It is dioecious, meaning that the male and female flowers grow on different shrubs. The sex of seedlings can only be determined at the first flowering, which mostly occurs after three years. The male inflorescence is built up of four to six apetalous flowers, while the female inflorescence normally consists of only one apetalous flower and contains one ovary and one ovule. Fertilization occurs solely via wind pollination, which is why male plants need to be planted near the female plants to allow for fertilization and fruit production.
The oval or lightly roundish fruits grow in compact grapes varying from pale yellow to dark orange. Individual fruits weigh between 270 and 480 mg and contain high amounts of vitamin C, vitamin E, carotenoids, flavonoids and health-beneficial fatty acids, as well as higher amounts of vitamin B12 than other fruits.
The plants have a very developed and extensive root system, and the roots live in symbiosis with nitrogen-fixing Frankia bacteria. The roots also transform insoluble organic and mineral matters from the soil into more soluble states. Vegetative reproduction of the plants occurs rapidly via root suckers.
H. rhamnoides is divided into eight subspecies: ssp. carpatica, caucasia, fluviatilis, mongolica, rhamnoides, sinensis, turkestanica and yunnanensis. These subspecies vary in size, shape, number of main lateral veins in the leaves and quantity and color of stellate hairs. They also have different areas of distribution and specific utilizations.
The genus name Hippophae originates from the Greek words hippo = “horse” and phaos = “to shine” and is due to the ancient Greek use of sea buckthorn leaves as horse fodder to make their coats shine more. The species name rhamnoides means “resembling the Rhamnus“, referring to the buckthorn plant.
H. rhamnoides is native to the cold-temperate regions of Europe and Asia, between 27 and 69EN latitude and 7EW and 122EE longitude. These regions include the Baltic Coasts of Finland, Poland and Germany, the Gulf of Bothnia in Sweden, as well as coastal areas of the United Kingdom. In Asia, H. rhamnoides can be found in the northern regions of China, throughout most of the Himalayan region, including India, Nepal and Bhutan, as well as in the northern regions of Pakistan and Afghanistan. It is found in a variety of locations: on hills and hillsides, valleys, riverbeds, along coastal regions, on islands, in small isolated or continuous pure stands, but also in mixed stands with other shrub and tree species. H. rhamnoides has also recently been planted in countries such as Canada, USA, Bolivia, Chile, South-Korea and Japan.
The current total acreage of H. rhamnoides is about 3.0 million ha worldwide. This number includes both wild and cultivated plants. Of these, approximately 2.5 million ha are situated in China (1.0 million ha of wild plants and 1.5 million ha in plantations), 20 000 ha in Mongolia, 12 000 ha in India and 3 000 ha in Pakistan. This makes China the largest agricultural producer of H. rhamnoides. Approximately 10 000 acres of the plant are planted in China each year for berry production as well as eco-environmental improvement. As of 2003, approximately 100 km of field shelterbelts were planted in Canada each year, and over 250 000 mature fruit-producing plants were grown on the Canadian prairies with an estimated annual fruit supply of 750 000 kg. Other countries that grow H. rhamnoides as an agricultural plant include for example Germany and France.
Sea buckthorn fruit contains sugars, sugar alcohols, fruit acids, vitamins (C, E, and K), polyphenols, carotenoids, fiber, amino acids, minerals, and plant sterols. Species belonging to genus Hippophae accumulate oil both in soft parts and in seed of the fruit. Oil content in soft parts is 1.5–3.0%, while in seed this is 11% of the fresh weight. For the compositions of sea buckthorn oils, see article: sea buckthorn oil.
Major sugars in sea buckthorn fruits are fructose and glucose, with total sugar content of 2.7-5.3 g/100 ml of juice. Typical sourness of the fruits is due to high content of malic acid (0.8-3.2 g/100 ml of juice) while astringency is related to quinic acid (1.2-2.1 g/100 ml of juice). Major sugar alcohol in fruit is L-quebrachitol (0.15-0.24 g/100 ml of juice).
The fruit of the plant has a high vitamin C content – in a range of 114 to 1550 mg per 100 grams, with an average content (695 mg per 100 grams), placing sea buckthorn fruit among the most enriched plant sources of vitamin C. Additionally, fruits have high concentrations of carotenoids, vitamin E and vitamin K.
The main carotenoids are beta-carotene, zeaxanthin and lycopene while alpha-tocopherol is the major vitamin E compound.
H. rhamnoides is a very versatile plant and the fruits as well as the leaves can be used. The fruits are processed and then used in the food industry, in traditional medicine, as part of drugs or in the cosmetic industry. The leaves can be used as feed, particularly for ruminants. Because of its tolerance against strongly eroded, nutrient poor and sometime salty soils, the plant is also used for land reclamation or as shelterbelt.
In general, all parts of the H. rhamnoides contain diverse phytochemicals and nutrients. Particularly the fruit contains high vitamin C amounts, exceeding the levels seen in lemons and oranges. H. rhamnoides fruits are processed in the food industry to different products. Usually, the berries are first washed and then pressed, resulting in pomace and juice. The fruit pomace can be used to obtain oil, natural food color (yellow/orange) or jam, while the juice is further processed and packaged as a consumer product. H. rhamnoides oil may be used to produce cosmetics, such as hand cream, shampoo or massage oils. The leaves of the shrub can be air dried, eventually ground, and used for tea.
H. rhamnoides is widely used in traditional medicine, particularly in Russia and Northeast Asia. The leaves are used as supposed herbal medicine for various disorders. H. rhamnoides fruits have also been used in the traditional Austrian medicine internally as tea, juice, or syrup for treatment of infections.
The H. rhamnoides plant is particularly drought and salt tolerant and can thus be successfully used for land reclamation, against further soil erosion, as shelterbelt or in agroforestry. These characteristics are mainly due to the deep root system that the plant develops. For example, in eastern China, new agroforestry systems have been developed to reclaim land with high salinity contents and H. rhamnoides is included in the system as shelterbelt, providing a habitat to different birds and small mammals.
Soil and climate requirements
In nature H. rhamnoides is found growing profusely on a wide range of soil types, but does better in soils with a light physical structure, rich in nutrient compounds and with a pH near neutral (pH 6.5–7.5). Best growth occurs in deep, well drained, sandy loam with ample organic matter. Very light, sandy soils have low water carrying capacity and are also low in nutrient mineral elements; so without the previous addition of organic matter, are not appropriate. Similarly inappropriate are clayey soils, with high density and water retention characteristics.
H. rhamnoides is considered drought resistant but it is a moisture sensitive plant especially in the spring when plants are flowering and young fruits are beginning to develop. Planting in arid or semiarid areas is possible, if water is supplied for establishment.
It can bear fruits at altitudes up to 2000 m above sea level. The plant can withstand temperatures from −43 °C to + 40 °C  Vegetation begins at average daily air temperatures of 5 to 7 °C. It flowers at temperatures 10 to 15 °C and requires total effective temperatures, spring to harvest time, of 14.5 °C to 17.5 °C, depending on latitude, elevation and species. Frost hardiness is the highest in deep dormancy in November and December. During this period, negative temperatures of −50 °C may be tolerated. Whereas in the post-dormant period in January to March, the critical temperature drops in air temperature for the male to −30 °C to −35 °C and for the female, −40 °C to -45 °C. H. rhamnoides can only be grown in well-lit, unshaded areas. Starting from its very earliest stage of development, it can not tolerate shade.
As for fertilization, phosphorus is indispensable for the normal life process of the nodules on the roots. The plant requires little nitrogen, due to its ability to fix nitrogen.
H. rhamnoides needs a period of 4 to 5 years from the appearance of the first shoots from the seeds to the beginning of fruit and peaks at the 7–8th year of plant life, remaining productive for 30 years with intermittent pruning. Spring is the best time for planting H. rhamnoides. An orchard planting can yield 10 tonnes of berries per hectare. A number of seeds per planting site is recommended at spacing of 1 m within the row and 4 m between the rows, south-east sloping terrain is recommended to facilitate the maximum sunlight exposure and rows should be oriented in a north– south direction to provide maximum light.
The purpose of pruning H. rhamnoides is to train branches, promote growth and facilitate harvesting. Moderate pruning will increase the yield and fruiting life of the plants. The crown should be pruned to remove overlapping branches, and long branches should be cut to encourage development of lateral shoots. Mature fruiting plants should be pruned to allow more light penetration. Pruning is also recommended to eliminate thorns on the mature wood to facilitate harvesting. Pruning should be started the year trees have been planted, late winter pruning is best time.
Seed propagation is not commonly used in orchards because the species is dioecious, therefore the sex cannot be determined in the seed, or prior to 3 to 4 years of growth. And male plants must be replaced. If seedlings of unknown sex are planted, it may result in an uneven distribution of male and female plants. To avoid this problem, excessive male plants are replaced with female plants, or vegetative propagation from mature plants of known sex is done.
With vegetative propagation, the cuttings will bear fruit 1 to 2 years earlier than seed propagated trees and the genetics and sex are known from the mother plant. Sea buckthorn can be propagated using either hardwood or softwood cuttings, root cuttings, layering and suckers.
Cross-pollination is by wind action only. The ratio and distance of male to female plants is important, as the number of female trees in each planting directly affects the total yield. Recommendations for male and female ratio vary from 6 to 12%, while the distance within which the female plant can be pollinated is about 100m. It has been shown that as the distance from the female plant to the male plant (polliniser) increases (64m), the yield of the female plant decreases.
The large morphological diversity is a good indication for opportunities in selection of desired characteristics for a given region. Mass selection is still practiced in many areas, although it is gradually replaced by hybridization and polyploidy breeding. The most important characteristics that need improvement are: yield, fruit size, winter hardness, thornlessness, fruit and pollen quality and early maturity, long pedicel (to facilitate mechanical harvest) and nitrogen fixing ability.
Harvesting and challenges in mechanization
The fruits ripen in the fall and frequently cling on the shrub until the following March/April. Estimate of orchard planting with 4,000 trees per hectare and a 1:6–8 male and female ratio, should yield approximately 10 tonnes. Good plants will produce up to 7 kg annually. In Asia the fruits are harvested by hand; this process requires about 1500 person-hours/ha. Fruit harvest is the most time consuming operation in growing H. rhamnoides. The relatively small fruit size, short pedicel, force required to pull off each fruit, the density of fruit on the branch, and the thorniness of the plant, are the disadvantages during harvesting.
Difficulties in harvesting are the major barriers of orchard production and development of the plant’s potential as a cash crop. Harvesting the fruit is problematic because the fruit does not easily release from the stem. Different mechanical harvest methods have been developed, such as shaking, vacuum and quick freezing, but most have the disadvantages of fruit and bark damage and low efficiency.
Except when frozen on the shrub, fresh fruit mechanical harvesting is still in the development stage. This is mainly due to the difficulty in separating the stem (pedicel) from the berry (pericarp). The mechanical harvesting method usually eliminates the necessity for maintenance pruning, leaving a hedge that has been uniformly cut back. A trunk clamp-on vibrator harvester may be used when the fruit is frozen on the shrub, but with this method leaf and wood contamination is high and an additional step of berry cleaning is necessary.
H. rhamnoides plants that are 1–2 years old develop root nodules containing actinobacteria of the genus Frankia, which are capable of fixing nitrogen. As a result of this relationship, the soils in stands of H. rhamnoides are enriched in nitrogen. The nitrogen-fixing activity of the symbiotic bacteria is not constant, but depends on external factors such as the climate or whether additional nitrogen fertilization occurred.
Diseases and insect pests
Both in Asia and in Europe, sea buckthorn losses occur notably due to environmental stress, wilt disease and insect pests. It is estimated that more than 60,000 ha of natural and planted sea buckthorn stands have died in China since the year 2000 due to these three factors, and approximately 5,000 ha perish each year.
Wilt disease is a combination of fungal diseases that is sometimes also called “dried-shrink disease”, “shrivelled disease”, “dry rot” or “dry atrophy”. In China, it causes fruit yield losses of 30–40% and annual losses of mature plantations of 4 000 ha. Several pathogens have been described as causing the sickness in sea buckthorn:
- the genus Fusarium (Fusarium wilt): F. acuminatum, F. camptoceras and F. oxysporum, as well as F. rhizoctonia and F. solani and F. sporotrichioides
- the genus Stigmina
- the genus Verticillium (Verticillium wilt): V. albo-atrum and V. dahliae
- the species Plowrightia hippophaes
- the species Phellinus hippophaeicola
- the species Phomopsis spp.
Methods to control the disease include removing and burning infected branches, not replanting H. rhamnoides at the same site for 3–5 years, and avoiding to make cuttings from infected plants. Antagonistic fungi like Trichoderma sp. or Penicillium sp. can be used to combat wilt disease in plants infected by Plowrightia hippophaes. Additionally, four strains of Cladothrix actinomyces were found to be usable as antagonistic fungi in H. rhamnoides plants infected by Fusarium sporotrichioides. Cultivars of H. rhamnoides that were relatively resistant to wilt disease have also been identified.
H. rhamnoides is affected by several insect pests, of which green aphids (Capitophorus hippophaes) are one of the most damaging. They are usually found in the new growth on shoot tips where they stunt growth and cause yellowing of the leaves. This is then followed by shrinking of the leaves along their central vain, after which they drop prematurely.
Another serious pest is the seabuckthorn fruit fly (Rhagoletis batava), whose larvae feed on the fruit flesh, rendering the fruits unsuitable for use.
H. rhamnoides is also affected by the gall tick (Vasates spp.), which causes gall formation on the leaves and thereby leads to deformation of the leaf surface.
Both the leaf roller (Archips rosana) and the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) chew on H. rhamnoides leaves. The leaf roller occurs from May to July, while the gypsy moth occurs later in the summer.
Further insect pests include the commashaped scale (Chionaspis salicis), which sucks sap from the bark and can cause important damage by leading to the death of the plant, and the larvae of the sea buckthorn moth (Gelechia hippophaella), which penetrate into fresh buds and feed on them. Thrips, and occasionally earwigs have also been observed as affecting H. rhamnoides.
H. rhamnoides is also involved in interactions with various animals (birds, rodents, deer, livestock) that can lead to damage in plantations.
Weed control is important, especially during the early growth stages of H. rhamnoides, since it grows slower than weeds due to its less vigorous root system. Weeds should be removed before planting by preparing the land adequately, and they should subsequently be controlled during the first four to five years, until the shrubs are high enough to shade out the weeds. Weed control is done both mechanically and manually. Weeding should however not be too deep so as not to damage the root system of H. rhamnoides.
As of 2003, no herbicides were registered for use in orchards of H. rhamnoides.
- Stace, C. A. (2010). New Flora of the British Isles (Third ed.). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521707725.
- Li, TSC; Schroeder, WR (1996). “Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.): A Multipurpose Plant” (PDF). HortTechnology. 6 (4): 370–380.
- Synge, PM (1974). Dictionary of gardening: A practical and scientific encyclopaedia of horticulture (2 ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0198691068.
- Bernáth, J.; Földesi, D. (1992). “Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.): A Promising New Medicinal and Food Crop”. Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants. 1 (1–2): 27–35. doi:10.1300/J044v01n01_04.
- Li, TSC; Beveridge, THJ (2003). Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.): Production and Utilization. Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press. ISBN 978-0660190075. OCLC 928553466.
- Bal, LM; Meda, V; Naik, SN; Satya, S (2011). “Sea buckthorn berries: A potential source of valuable nutrients for nutraceuticals and cosmoceuticals”. Food Research International. 44 (7): 1718–1727. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2011.03.002.
- Stobdan, T; Chaurasia, OP; Korekar, G; Mundra, S; Ali, Z; Yadav, A; Singh, SB (2010). “Attributes of Seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) to Meet Nutritional Requirements in High Altitude”. Defence Science Journal. 60 (2): 226–230. doi:10.14429/dsj.60.344.
- Lu, R (1992). “Sea buckthorn: A multipurpose plant species for fragile mountains” (PDF). ICIMOD Occasional Paper No. 20. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Katmandu, Nepal. Index page from publisher is here.
- Rousi, A (1971). “The Genus Hippophae L.: A Taxonomic Study”. Annales Botanic Fennica. 8: 177–227. JSTOR 23724624.
- Rajchal, R (2009). “Seabuckthorn (Hippophae salicifolia) Management Guide” (PDF). The Rufford Small Grants for Nature Conservation.
- “Hippophae rhamnoides”. Davis Landscape Architects. 26 November 2012.
- Biswas, MR; Biswas, AK (1980). “In desertification, control the deserts and create pastures”. Environ. Sci. Appl. 12: 145–162.
- Kluczynski, B (1989). “Effects of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) cultivation on post-industrial wastelands in Poland”. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Sea Buckthorn, October 19–23, 1989, Xi’an, China: 275–287.
- Baker, RM (1996). “The future of the invasion shrub, sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides), on the west coast of Britain”. Aspects of Applied Biology. 44: 461–468.
- Ruan, CJ; Teixeira da Silva, JA; Li, Q; Li, H; Zhang, J (2010). “Pathogenicity of dried-shrink disease and evaluation of resistance in a germplasm collection of sea buckthorn (Hippophae L.) from China and other countries”. Scientia Horticulturae. 127: 70–78. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.007.
- Ruan, C-J; Rumpunen, K; Nybom, H (2013). “Advances in improvement of quality and resistance of a multipurpose crop: sea buckthorn”. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 33 (2): 126–144. doi:10.3109/07388551.2012.676024.
- Schroeder, WR; Yao, Y (1995). Sea Buckthorn : A Promising Multipurpose Crop for Saskatchewan. Canada: PFRA Shelterbelt Centre.
- “Die Sanddornfruchtfliege (Rhagoletis batava) – Untersuchungen zur Biologie und zum Auftreten 2014 in Gülzow” (PDF).
- “Natvit – L’argousier bio une baie riche en vitamines A, C et E”.
- Zheng, Jie; Yang, Baoru; Trépanier, Martin; Kallio, Heikki (2012). “Effects of genotype, latitude, and weather conditions on the composition of sugars, sugar alcohols, fruit acids, and ascorbic acid in sea buckthorn (Hippophaë rhamnoides ssp. mongolica) berry juice”. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 60 (12): 3180–3189. doi:10.1021/jf204577g. ISSN 0021-8561. PMID 22397621.
- Zeb, A (2004). “Chemical and nutritional constituents of sea buckthorn juice” (PDF). Pakistan J Nutr. 3 (2): 99–106. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-05-28.
- Andersson, Staffan C.; Olsson, Marie E.; Johansson, Eva; Rumpunen, Kimmo (2009). “Carotenoids in sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) berries during ripening and use of pheophytin a as a maturity marker”. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 57 (1): 250–258. doi:10.1021/jf802599f. ISSN 0021-8561. PMID 19125686.
- Kallio, Heikki; Yang, Baoru; Peippo, Pekka; Tahvonen, Raija; Pan, Ruilin (2002). “Triacylglycerols, glycerophospholipids, tocopherols, and tocotrienols in berries and seeds of two subspecies (ssp. sinensis and mongolica) of sea buckthorn (Hippophaë rhamnoides)”. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 50 (10): 3004–3009. doi:10.1021/jf011556o. ISSN 0021-8561.
- Gutzeit, D.; Baleanu, G.; Winterhalter, P.; Jerz, G. (March 2007). “Determination of processing effects and of storage stability on vitamin K1 (phylloquinone) in sea buckthorn berries (Hippophaë rhamnoides L. ssp. rhamnoides) and related products”. Journal of Food Science. 72 (9): C491–C497. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00567.x. ISSN 1750-3841.
- Gutzeit, D.; Winterhalter, P.; Jerz, G. (2008). “Nutritional assessment of processing effects on major and trace element content in sea buckthorn juice (Hippophaë rhamnoides L. ssp. rhamnoides)”. Journal of Food Science. 73 (6): H97–H102. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00817.x. ISSN 1750-3841.
- Yang, Baoru; Karlsson, Riina M.; Oksman, Pentti H.; Kallio, Heikki P. (March 2001). “Phytosterols in sea buckthorn (Hippophaë rhamnoides L.) berries: identification and effects of different origins and harvesting times”. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 49 (11): 5620–5629. doi:10.1021/jf010813m. ISSN 0021-8561.
- Rösch, Daniel; Bergmann, Meike; Knorr, Dietrich; Kroh, Lothar W. (2003). “Structure−antioxidant efficiency relationships of phenolic compounds and their contribution to the antioxidant activity of sea buckthorn juice”. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 51 (15): 4233–9. doi:10.1021/jf0300339. PMID 12848490.
- Li, Thomas S. C. (2002). “Production development of sea buckthorn”. American Society for Horticultural Science: 393–398.
- Hussain, Iqbal; Khan, Lajber; Gul, Akhtar; Ahmed, Nazir; Saleem, Muhammad (2008). “Comparative study of vitamin C contents in fruits and medicinal plants”. Journal of the Chemical Society of Pakistan. 30 (3): 406–9.
- Bal, Lalit M; Meda, Venkatesh; Naik, S N; Satya, Santosh (2011). “Sea buckthorn berries: A potential source of valuable nutrients for nutraceuticals and cosmoceuticals”. Food Research International. 44: 1718–1727. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2011.03.002.
- Guliyev, Vahid Bilaloglu; Mustafa, Gul; Yildirim, Ali (2004). “Hippophae rhamnoides L.: chromatographic methods to determine chemical composition, use in traditional medicine and pharmacological effects”. Journal of Chromatography B. 812: 291–307. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.08.047.
- Chirstaki, Efterpi (2002). “Hippophae Rhamnoides L. (Sea Buckthorn): a Potential Source of Nutraceuticals”. Food and Public Health. 2 (3): 69–72. doi:10.5923/j.fph.20120203.02.
- Vogl, Sylvia; Picker, Paolo; Mihaly-Bison, Judit; Fakhrudin, Nanang; Atanasov, Atanas G; Heiss, Elke H; Wawrosch, Christoph; Reznicek, Gottfried; et al. (2013). “Ethnopharmacological in vitro studies on Austria’s folk medicine—An unexplored lore in vitro anti-inflammatory activities of 71 Austrian traditional herbal drugs”. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 149 (3): 750–71. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2013.06.007. PMC 3791396. PMID 23770053.
- Biswas, A; Bharti, VK; Acharya, S; Pawar, DD; Singh, SB (2010). “Sea buckthorn: new feed opportunity for poultry in cold arid Ladakh region of India”. World’s Poultry Science Journa. 66: 707–714. doi:10.1017/S004393391000067X.
- Jianfeng, Zhang; Shangjun, Ring; Jiyue, Li; Makeschin, F (2004). “Agroforestry and its Application in Amelioration of Saline Soils in Eastern China Coastal Region”. Forestry Studies in China. 6 (2): 27–33.
- Cristian Mihai Enescu (2014). “Sea-buckthorn: a species with a variety of uses,”. Dendrobiology. 72: 41–46. doi:10.12657/denbio.072.003.
- Kondrashov V.T., Sokolova E.P. (1990). “New wilt-resistant forms of Hippophaë rhamnoides”. Byulleten Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelei Prirody Biologicheskii 96: 146–153.
- Eliseev, I.P., and Fefelov, V.A (1977). “Material for studying Hippophae rhamnoides in”. Tr. Gor’k. S-Kh Inst. 105: 3–7.CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
- Dobritsa, S.V.; Novik, S.N. (1992). “Feedback regulation of nodule formation in Hippophae”. Plant Soil. 144: 45–50. doi:10.1007/bf00018843.
- Rousi, A. (1971). “The genus Hippophae L. A taxonomic study”. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 8: 177–227.
- Huang, Q. (1995). “A review on Hippophae breeding in China”. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Sea Buckthorn, China.
- Shchapov, N.S.; Kreimer, V.K. (1988). “Experimental polyploids of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) I. Producing and identifying polyploids”. Invest. Sibirsk. Otdel. Akad. Nauk SSR Biol. Ikh Nauk. 6: 111–117.
- Schroeder, W.R.; Yao, Y. (1995). “Sea buckthorn: a promising multipurpose crop for”. Prairie Farm Rehabilitation, Agriculture & Agri-Food.
- Gaetke, R.; Triquart, E. (1992). “Pruning machine for mechanized harvest of sea buckthorn”. Gartenbau Mag. 1: 57–58.
- Varlamov, G.P.; Gabuniya, V.G. (1990). “Picking sea buckthorn fruit by suction air stream”. Trak. Sel’sk. Mash. 1: 29–30.
- Olander, S. (1995). “Mechanical harvesting of sea buckthorn”. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Sea Buckthorn, China.
- “RHS Plantfinder – Hippophae rhamnoides ‘Leikora‘“. Retrieved 6 March 2018.
- “AGM Plants – Ornamental” (PDF). Royal Horticultural Society. July 2017. p. 49. Retrieved 2 March 2018.
- Stewart, WDP; Pearson, MC (1967). “Nodulation and nitrogen-fixation by Hippophae rhamnoides L. in the field”. Plant Soil. 26: 348–360. doi:10.1007/bf01880184.
- Gatner, EMS; Gardener, IC (1970). “Observations on the fine structure of the root nodule endophye of Hippophae rhamnoides L.”. Arch. Mikrobiol. 70: 183–196. doi:10.1007/bf00407709.
- Montpetit, D; Lalonde, M (1988). “In vitro propagation and subsequent nodulation of the actinorhizal Hippophae rhamnoides L.”. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 15: 189–200. doi:10.1007/bf00033643.
- Du, HJ (2002). “Identification and screen of resistance to dried-shrink disease of sea buckthorn cultivars”. Hippophae. 15: 13–14.
- Du, HJ (2001). “Development and causative agent of shrivelled disease of sea buckthorn: survey and analysis”. Hippophae. 14: 13–15.
- Li, JM; Liu, XH (2006). “Screening tests of W culture medium against actinomyces in sea buckthorn dry rot”. Hippophae. 19: 18–20.
- Zhang, J; Xin, WB (2002). “Epidemic construction of and escaping from sea buckthorn dry atrophy in cold desert”. Hippophae. 15: 16–18.
- Zhang, J; Meng, QT; Zhou, ZZ; Li, HW; Sun, HS (2001). “A preliminary study on sea buckthorn wilt disease and its control”. Hippophae. 14: 14–16.
- Wu, FH; Zhao, YZ (2004). “A review of diseases and pest control of seabuckthorn in former USSR”. Global Seabuckthorn Res Dev. 2: 44–48.
- Song, HZ (2009). Study on the pathogen and pollution-free control of dry shrink of sea buckthorn in Heilongjiang province. Harbin, China: Dissertation for Master’s Degree, Northeast Forestry University.
- Kauppinen, S (2010). “Sea buckthorn cultivation in Finland now and the future progress”. 1st European Workshop on sea buckthorn, Euroworks 2010: Potsdam, December 1–3.
- Laurinen, E (1994). “Non-traditional culture of tree fruit and small fruit crops outside the normal season and new species for economic production”. Nordi Jordbruksforsk. 76: 149–174.
- Hornig, R; Hohne, F; Jalakas, M (2010). “Results of a German-Estonian sea buckthorn cultivar trial”. 1st European Workshop on sea buckthorn, Euroworks 2010:Potsdam, December 1–3.
- Zhang, J (2006). “Screening and application of antagonistic fungus of sea buckthorn Plowrightia hippophaes”. Global Seabuckthorn Res Dev. 4: 35–40.
- Xu, MQ; Dai, YC (1997). “A New Forest Pathogen on Hippophae in China: Phellinus hippophaeicola”. Forest Res. 10: 380–382.
- Liu, XH; Ji, BY; Sun, CH; Wang, YH (2006). “Isolation, screening and identification of antagonistic cladothrix actinomyces of sea buckthorn dry rot”. Hippophae. 19: 23–25.
- Kadamshoev, M (1998). “The green sea buckthorn aphid”. Zash.-Karant. Rast. 12: 22.
- Rongsen, L (1992). “Seabuckthorn – A Multipurpose Plant Species for Fragile Mountains”. ICIMOD Occasional Paper. Kathmandu, Nepal: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development. 20.
- Sigh, V; Li, TSC; Rongsen, L; Zubarev, Y (2009). Sanddorn – Moderne Anbautechnologien. Norderstedt, Germany: Books on demand GmbH.
- Li, TSC; McLoughlin, C (1997). Sea Buckthorn Production Guide. Peachland, BC, Canada: Canada Seabuckthorn Enterprises Limited.