Please refrain from reinserting material at The Most Holy Book. Your addition is a type of content forking which is unacceptable within Wikipedia policy. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 16:27, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Non sequitur (literary device) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Non sequitur (literary device) was changed by Pyrex9 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970644 on 2014-11-24T15:45:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:45, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pyrex9. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 18:41, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armin J Jezari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armin J Jezari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Melcous (talk) 09:30, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may not cite your addition directly to Bahai religious texts. That's original research. IF you want to make such an addition to the article, you must cite it to independent third-party reliable sources. Skyerise (talk) 13:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You should remove all citations to the Bible and Quran on Wikipedia then. There are a lot of them. Here’s just one example: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Testament. Otherwise you should undo both your edits. Pyrex9 (talk) 19:38, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for Throne of God and any other articles you are attempting to spam with your beliefs. Skyerise (talk) 13:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes with this. There's no spam. It's 100% accurate. Please undo your edits. Pyrex9 (talk) 19:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:OTHERCONTENT and {{Religious text primary}}. Skyerise (talk) 17:24, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]