Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Some serious cherry picking in the reviews section. Most of them are lukewarm or rather negative, including the New York Times one, which is very critical indeed but is selectively quoted to sound like it recommends the book.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Queen: Her Life and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 09:11, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, LordVoldemort728! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 09:11, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Why did you move the draft to mainspace without doing anything to address the problems with it? --bonadea contributions talk 12:47, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

By the way, why did you write a draft that contained no actual info about the book other than its title and author? Really basic facts such as when it was published was missing. Please don't be in such a hurry – take some time to think about what are the most important facts about a topic. How many stars some reviewer gave the book is not one of the most important fact. --bonadea contributions talk 12:56, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

@Bonadea The book has notability. Content can be improved, I've tagged it as a stub. If you disagree, take it to AfD — DaxServer (t · m · c) 15:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

@DaxServer: What I did was change the highly promotional article into a redirect, to remove give the article creator or other editors a chance to clean it up before it became a mainspace article. You reverted the redirect but didn't do anything to address the issues. Did you read the reviews that were misleadingly quoted in the article? AfD is not cleanup, and the fact that the article is a promo piece is unconnected to notability. No need to worry – I'll clean it up as best I can, but it is concerning that an AfC reviewer moved their own declined draft to mainspace with serious NPOV issues, which had been spelt out to them, remaining. --bonadea contributions talk 16:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

@Bonadea I'm aware of @LordVoldemort728 history of moving their own declined drafts. He even wrote horribly incorrect information in a stub article of two sentences - User talk:LordVoldemort728/Archive 15#Your submission at Articles for creation: Tlohang Sekhamane has been accepted. That being said, with the exception of "BOOK REVIEW: Morton brings 'humanness' to Queen's biography" which I can't access due to EU restriction and neither in archive, the NYT quote is not falsified. Agree that it only provided the positive criticism and didn't have the full picture violating WP:NPOV. The WaPo quote is literally the byline description. Nothing to say about The Telegraph, Vulture and Star Tribune. As such, I don't see the necessity to WP:BLAR it. I meant AfD if you disagree with its notability. Since you rightly raised that I haven't addressed [the NPOV], I'll expand these 5 reviews when I get some time.

For the record, a large portion of articles by @LordVoldemort728 fit this format. He simply quotes that they received reviews with all the citations but fails to write a proper article. Unfortunately that doesn't translate to BLAR and it certainly annoys me. I disagree with these articles [in the format they're written] but once they reach mainspace, I let them go. There's only so much that I can do.

Given that anyone can edit, I simply left it for the inspired to edit and improve it. That might be you, me, the creator or anyone else. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:01, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, LordVoldemort728. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bansal News, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Good morning,

You previously neglected the publishment of my article. I wonder if you could help me out to make sure it meets the Wikipedia Standards. It is an article on Leticia Mumford Geer. Rociofraguaspuy (talk) 14:21, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

@Rociofraguaspuy In your there are non reliable sources like a google search. I advice you to replace it with reliable source. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 14:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Can you add sources to Mouryan? DareshMohan (talk) 21:21, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

No. I am unable to find sources about that film. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 04:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, LordVoldemort728. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shiela Gujral".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:40, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello LordVoldemort728. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Suraj Singh Rawat, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G3: doubt as to whether or not this is a hoax; see the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:09, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

Administrator changes Aoidh KillerChihuahua

CheckUser changes Ferret

Guideline and policy news

• A community RfC is open to discuss whether reports primarily involving gender-related disputes or controversies should be referred to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

Technical news

• Some older web browsers will not be able to use JavaScript on Wikimedia wikis starting this week. This mainly affects users of Internet Explorer 11. (T178356)
• The rollback of Vector 2022 RfC has found no consensus to rollback to Vector legacy, but has found rough consensus to disable "limited width" mode by default.
• A link to the user's Special:CentralAuth page will now appear in the subtitle links shown on Special:Contributions. This was voted #17 in the Community Wishlist Survey 2023.

Arbitration

• The Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case has been closed.
• A case about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been opened, with the first evidence phase closing 6 April 2023.

What Are Your Views On This Wikipedia Article Bhasker Sharma Physician Does It Passes Notablity Criteria ?

And Please Change The Name Of The page From Bhaskar Sharma To Bhasker Sharma @LordVoldemort728

Lord Puneet Superstar (talk) 06:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arshad Hassan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arshad Hassan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Crazy XYZ, is not suitable as written to remain published.

I'm afraid it is simply too poorly written to be useful to our readers, and too many of the sources are not independent and/or unreliable.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 19:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

hello I was told that for DamnN Hunt to be a page i needed to get some References which there are now 2 with more to come. I beleive that this is enough for this to be a page on Wikipedia Needhelp16 (talk) 12:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

No. Atleast 3 references should be there. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 13:29, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Khenpo Sonam Tenphel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 02:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

David Archer (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 09:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC)