Cannabis Sativa

Page 1
MONITORING OF MIGRATORY SHOREBIRDS AT GULF OF MOTTAMA
Pyae Phyo Aung, Christoph Zöckler, Sayam U. Chowdhury, Chris Kelly Ding Li Yong, Wing Kan Fu ,
Pannachet Kijja, Tee, Suchart Daengpayon Chairunas Adha Putra , Saw Moses, Sa Myo Zaw Min
Thiha Zaw, Toe Tat Aung, Thiri Sandar Zaw , Poe Ei Nyein , Ei Thinzar Aung, Khaing Swe Wah
Biodiversity And Nature Conservation Association (BANCA)
May 2019
Table of Contents
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
An international survey team of over 19 surveyors from Bangladesh, China, Indonesia, Singapore,
Thailand, Germany and the U.K. assembled in the remote coastal mudflats to survey the key
wintering areas of the Spoon-billed Sandpipers and other shorebirds. They were accompanied by an
experienced team of Myanmar surveyors of BANCA and local fishermen, who join up for theses
winter surveys for the tenth year. A total of 136,383 wetland depended birds of 64 species were
recorded in the Gulf of Mottama between 20 January and 1 February 2019. The survey team recorded
an estimated 112 critically endangered Spoon-billed Sandpiper, based on the SBS proportion in 137
flock counts of over 36,000 birds extrapolated to an estimated 62,000 birds of small waders in the
area. These birds were encounter by the team at low tide feeding and widespread across the vast
mudflat habitats.. A Total of at least 14 individually flagged birds were observed. Of these four birds
could be identified individually. They include overall at least four head-started birds, as well as birds
marked on the breeding grounds and in China. Most interesting and surprising is the record of one
bird originating from the North Chukotka coast, an area that has very few birds left breeding there.
The relatively high proportion of 18.8% flagged birds could allow us to determine the overall global
population size, if we’d know of the total number of remaining flagged birds at this moment. For this
we have to wait for the breeding season and observe the return of marked birds into the breeding
population. Of other globally endangered species such as Great Knot 32 individual were observed,
as well as seven globally near-threatened species such Black-tailed Godwit (5,625 individuals), Bar-
tailed Godwit (21 individuals), Eurasian Curlew (597 individuals), Red-necked Stint (6,157 individuals
- 50% of Little & Red-necked Stint), Curlew Sandpiper (3,003 individuals) and Black-headed Ibis (51
individuals). The most abundant species were Lesser Sand Plover (16,385), Whiskered Tern (8,088)
and Kentish Plover (10,997).
2. INTRODUCTION
Coastal wetlands are important for the livelihood of the local communities, as well as offers invaluable
habitat to migratory birds. Main coastline of Myanmar is approximately 2400 km long, which is perhaps
the most intact coastline in Southeast Asia. Along the Myanmar coastal regions, the largest estuary in
Myanmar, Gulf of Mottama (GOM) is located at Yangon Region, Bago Region and Mon State. The area
is about 250,000 ha and the mudflat area (75,000) ha that bordered with mouth of Sittaung River and
Bay of Bangal. Gulf of Moattama wetland area is funnel-shape, the tide range is wide, during the spring
tide when the tide range is about (7-8) m covered the all mudflat area and during the need tide when the
tide range is about (3) m height. Its tidal cycle is extremely pronounced in speed and amplitude causing
a powerful bore phenomenon. The highly productive intertidal mudflats support up to 200,000 -
waterbirds, of which 12 are globally threatened according to IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
including the Critically Endangered Spoon-billed Sandpiper.
The Spoon-billed Sandpiper (Calidris pygmaea) is a long distance migrant, breeding in Russia and
annually migrating more than 8,000 km to winter in South and South-east Asia, with approximately half
of the global population is understood to be wintering in Myanmar and the large majority in the GOM
(Zöckler et al. 2016). This species is classified as globally Critically Endangered in the IUCN Red List of
Threatened Species. That is the highest category of extinction threat for any species still present in the
wild. In 2010, it was assessed that at the current rate of population decline this species could become
extinct within a decade. Myanmar is the most important country as a wintering ground for this species
with about half of the global population recorded wintering in Gulf of Mottama and harboring another
important wintering site in Nanthar Island of the coast of Rakhine State. The present of this species
recorded at the Taninthayi coast and Delta are also the incoming indicators of important habitats for
Spoon-billed Sandpiper and other migratory shore birds.
The biological productivity of this system supports a rich biota that exemplifies the importance of large
estuaries on an international scale as source areas for fish and invertebrates and as non-breeding
refuges for tens of thousands of migratory water birds. BANCA’s previous studies (2008-2016) on the
Gulf of Mottama is clearly meet with the 6 out of 9 Ramsar Criteria and need to protect, important habitat
of Spoon-billed Sandpiper global population. In 10th May 2017, the northern part of Gulf of Mottama area
(42,500) ha was designated as Fourth Ramsar Site of Myanmar.
In order to monitor waterbird population of Gulf of Mottama BANCA organized an international survey
team of over 20 surveyors from Bangladesh, China, Indonesia, Singapore, Thailand, Germany and the
U.K. These scientists assembled in the remote coastal mudflats between 20 January and 1 February
2019 to survey the key wintering areas of the Spoon-billed Sandpipers and other shorebirds.
3. SURVEY METHODS
Study area
In order to determine the survey area at the Gulf of Mottama, previous survey results were reviewed for
data and potential sites were identified with Landsat 8 from USGS and Google Earth. Koe Tae Su, Wae
Pyan (out), Thaungthit Lay and Thaungthit Lay (out) regions were surveys in the eastern side of the Gulf,
and Yae Din Kyun, Garr, Wae Pyan , Wae Pyan Auk, Anaing Auk, Baw Ka Gyi, Near the Main Channal,
Gar Auk and Kyeik Hto regions were surveyed in the western part of the Gulf. The survey was timed to
cover the highest spring tide because the boats we used only had free access over all of the intertidal
flats at high spring tides and because shorebirds are likely to be concentrated at high tides and to gather
in large flocks that we would be less likely to miss when attempting to count the total numbers of small
shorebirds (Aung et al. 2018).
Field surveys
The survey team was transported to as many parts of the study area as possible in shallow-draft fishing
boats, which were grounded on the mud in the intertidal zone at low tide to allow observation of birds
from the boat and on foot. In this way, the observers were able to conduct scan surveys throughout the
daylight period of tidal cycles and at a wide range of elevations relative to the high and low water marks.
Following protocol outlined in Aung et al. (2018), the surveyors were separated in groups of 2-4, who
walked across the mudflat during the ebb, diverging from the place where the boat was grounded, and
also viewed birds from the boats, especially when the tide was high. Surveyors used spotting scopes and
binoculars to record number of waterbirds during each scan (see below) and also estimated total number
of shorebirds, especially during high tide.
Spoon-billed Sandpiper
Counting Spoon-billed Sandpipers at any wintering site is challenging because they are rare and usually
dispersed within large flocks of other small shorebirds, especially the similarly coloured and sized red-
necked stint Calidris ruficollis. In the Upper Gulf of Mottama, complete direct counts of spoon-billed
sandpipers are impractical because of the large numbers of other small shorebirds that must be checked,
the large size of the intertidal area, day-to-day variation in the extent and location of foraging habitat
exposed at low tide and frequent changes in the location of high tide roosts. Roosts are often on very soft
substrates making it impossible to approach them before the birds leave on the falling tide. Therefore, in
order to estimate total number of Spoon-billed Sandpiper flock-count method (described below) was
applied along with exact counts of true observations.
Flock-counts
Each group of observers included individuals experienced in shorebird identification who scanned flocks
of resting and foraging small shorebirds using a telescope. A scan consisted of a search by one observer
through a group of small shorebirds, at the end of which the numbers of small shorebirds of each species
were recorded, together with the date and time of the record and the location, with a GPS. An individual
small shorebird was only included in the scan record if it was seen well enough to be sure whether it was
a spoon-billed sandpiper or not and observers were trained to spend enough time observing each bird
do this accurately. Training was given by the experienced observers to achieve consistency. Some scans
were conducted by inexperienced observers for training purposes and checked by a repeat survey of the
same flock by an experienced observe.
Shorebird species present, in addition to Spoon-billed Sandpipers, mostly comprised calidrid sandpipers
(Curlew Sandpiper Calidris ferruginea, Broad-billed Sandpiper Calidris falcinella and Red-necked Stint)
and plovers (Greater Sandplover Charadrius leschenaultia, Sesser Sandplover Charadrius mongolus,
Kentish plover Charadrius alexandrinus and little ringed plover Charadrius dubius). These species tended
to feed and roost in mixed species flocks and were readily distinguished at a distance on the ground and
in flight.
Analysis
The total proportion of small waders is based on the average mean of each species within all submitted
flocks. The total number of small shorebird species is than extrapolated based on the estimates of the
overall flock size of small waders. As the latter varies between counters and is likely more inaccurate
than the actual flock counts, the total number of SBS and other species varies widely according to the
range of overall flock size estimates.
4. RESULTS & DISCUSSION
A total of 136,383 wetland depended birds of 64 species were recorded in the Gulf of Mottama between
20 January and 1 February 2019. Of these, 119,520 shorebirds were estimated, comprising 62,000 in
the eastern side and 57,520 in the western side of the Gulf (Table 1 & 2). Other waterbirds such as gulls,
terns, ducks, ibis, egrets and herons include a total of 16,793 individuals at both eastern and western
parts of the gulf. In addition, 70 raptors (predatory birds) of 10 species were recorded during the survey.
The most abundant species were Lesser Sand Plover (16,385), Whiskered Tern (8,088) and Kentish
Plover (10,997). Highest concentration of shorebirds (estimated 42,000) were seen during high tide on
21 January 2019 at Thaungthit Lay, located in the eastern side of the gulf followed by 10,000 shorebirds
were estimated at Garr and Wae Pyan, respectively on 23 and 25 January 2019 on the western side of
the gulf.
Figure 1: Number of birds recorded at East and West sides of Mottama
Estimated total number in Gulf of Mottama
Table 1 shows the average proportion of small waders in small wader flocks in the Gulf of Mottama during
the survey period based on 137 flocks totaling over 38,000 small waders of eight or nine species (Red0-
necked Stint and Little Stint were summarized to one stint species only). Other small waders only
occurring in very few samples were not included.
Table 1: Average flock proportions of small waders in the Gulf of Mottama in January 2019 (n= 137)
English Name
Scientific Name
Flock count total Mean Proportion in %
Greater Sandplover
Charadrius leschenaultii
624
1.63
Lesser Sandplover
Charadrius mongolus
12292
32.20
Kentish Plover
Charadrius alexandrinus
11992
31.41
Little Ringed Plover
Charadrius dubius
129
0.34
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
Broad-billed Sandpiper Calidris falcinellus
2030
5.32
Curlew Sandpiper
Calidris ferruginea
2501
6.55
Red-necked/Little Stint
Calidris ruficollis/minuta
8541
22.37
Spoon-billed Sandpiper Calidris pygmaea
69
0.18
Total of all flocks
38,178
Total of SBS in flock
@42,000
76
Total of SBS in flock
@62,000
112
Total SBS in flock
@100,000
180
Considering the total of 76 SBS referring only to the flocks on the East side we should add 36 more
birds based on small wader flocks of 20,000 on the West side.
Spoon-billed Sandpiper number
The survey team recorded an estimated 93 (subjected to further analysis using flock-count method)
critically endangered Spoon-billed Sandpiper, comprising 36 in the eastern side and 57 in the western
side. These birds were encounter by the team at low tide feeding and widespread across the vast mudflat
habitats. The total number is expected to be higher, based on the proportion within large flocks of small
waders that were estimated to exceed 42,000 individuals. A Total of at least 10 or 12 individually flagged
birds were observed. Of these four individuals could be identified. These birds include at least four head-
started birds, as well as birds marked on the breeding grounds and in China. Most interesting and
surprising is the record of one or maybe two birds originating from the North Chukotka coast, an area that
has very few birds left breeding there.
Flagged birds
In total 14 Flagged birds were recorded (see table 2). X were from the Breeding ground of which xx from
the head-starting programme. One bird is remarkable in the sense it has a blue flag that is only known
from North Chukotka. It is not clear if the bird is from the Chukchi Peninsula or Russky Koshka near
Anadyr, but accompanying accessories or the lack of it point to Russky Koshka. Several flags were from
China (xx)
Table 2: Details of flagged Spoon-billed Sandpipers at the Gulf of Mottama.
Date
Obser
Name Time
Coordinate
No. SBS
Flag Flag Information
23.1.2019 MTHZ 5:15 17.17027 96.87886
1
White flag on the left leg
24.1.2019 MTHZ 10:11 17.1344 96.95889
1
Unidentified Color/Number
27.1.2019 MTHZ 11:20 17.07796 96.9385
1
Unidentified Color/Number
27.1.2019 MTHZ 5:10 17.07796 96.9385
1
Unidentified Color/Number
27.1.2019 MTHZ 11:20 17.07796 96.9385
1
Unidentified Color/Number
27.1.2019 MTHZ 5:10 17.07796 96.9385
1
Unidentified Color/Number
29.1.2019 MTHZ 8:31 17.03417 96.96107
2
One SBS has Yellow flag on the left
leg, One Blue (EJ)
29.1.2019 MTHZ 1:00 17.05123 96.93377
1
Flag on right leg blue color
29.1.2019 MTHZ 1:39 17.04555 96.92387
1
Light green on the left leg
29.1.2019 MTHZ 4:22 17.04009 96.93031
1
One Yellow flag on the left leg
23.1.2019 CZ 10:40 17.09162 96.96185
1
White marked but not identified
23.1.2019 CZ 12:20 17.09162 96.96185
1
Lime green 48
24.1.2019 CZ 11:20 17.09162 96.96185
1
White 3K
24.1.2019 CK 17:30 17.12822 96.96214
1
One Yellow flag on the Right leg
24.1.2019 CK 15:47 17.10484 96.95732
1
Pale blue flag on the right leg
27.1.2019 CK 13:02 17.07888 96.93636
1
Yellow flag on the right leg (XE)
27.1.2019 CK 15:13 17.0805 96.93679
1
Yellow flag on the right leg (XE)
27.1.2019 CK 15:29 17.08143 96.93706
1
Yellow flag on the left lg
28.1.2019 CK 7:28 17.099 96.93191
1
Lime flag on the left leg
29.1.2019 CK 7:04 17.05729 96.93396
1
Yellow flag on the left leg
29.1.2019 CK 7:23 17.05866 96.9347
1
Yellow flag on the left leg
29.1.2019 CK 8:23 17.0589 96.93497
1
Lime flag on the left leg
29.1.2019 CK 12:20 17.05123 96.93375
1
Lime flag on the left leg
29.1.2019 CK 12:32 17.05123 96.93375
1
Unidentified leg (lime flag)
30.1.2019 CK 9:32 17.04176 96.92661
1
Yellow flag on the right leg (YE)
Estimated total population number based on flagged birds
Based on the flock counts 13 out of the total of 69 SBS were flagged, which is 18.84%. This is similar to
other wintering sites: Nan Thar: 2 of 20 (10%), Gulf of Bangkok (3 of 9 (33%) and Sonadia 2 of 14
(14.3%). Considering the high number of count data the figure of 18.84% from the GoM appears to be
closer to the real proportion. However, it is not quite known yet how many of the total flagged birds
globally are still alive in January 2019. This figures is likely to range between 80 and 110 which would
translate into a 425 – 584 birds.
Comparisons of results with previous years
Table 3: The 2019 total estimated number of SBS compared with previous years in the period between
2010- 2019.
2010 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
2018 2019
SBS
observed
75
100
35
154
99
100
8
110+
SBS
estimated
180-
220
Other globally threatened waterbirds
One globally endangered (32 individual Great Knots), seven globally near-threatened species such Black-
tailed Godwit (5,625 individuals), Bar-tailed Godwit (21 individuals), Eurasian Curlew (597 individuals),
Red-necked Stint (6,157 individuals - 50% of Little & Red-necked Stint), Curlew Sandpiper (3,003
individuals) and Black-headed Ibis (51 individuals).
Overall conclusion
In total the number of shorebirds have increased compared to previous years. This is largely true for
almost all species. In particular small waders appear to have increased, although exact numbers are
difficult to provide with. However, observations in recent years indicate that the Spoon-billed sandpiper
continued to decline. This is in line with Aung et al. (2018) pointing to a continuing gradual decline. To
determine how large the decline is, is not possible to say, considering the large number of varying factors
such as the total flock size of all small waders and the total number of flagged birds still alive in 2019.
The numbers of flagged birds have increased significantly pointing to a high number of surviving birds
and reflecting also a heightened observer activity resulting in higher readings. It is quite possible that
based on the survey results the total global population is between 425-583 individual birds, which equals
120-160 breeding pairs. This also means that we also do not know the wintering grounds of about 2/3 of
the global population.
The Gulf of Mottama is still by far the most abundant and most common wintering site for the Spoon-
billed Sandpiper and also for many other species. It is reassuring that the site is now fully protected as
Ramsar site and also has been managed and mitigated from almost all hunting activities.
5. TEAM MEMBERS
Sl.
#
Name
Organization
Sl. #
Name
Organization
1 Christoph Zöckler
Spoon-billed Sandpiper Task
Force
11 Thaw Phyo Shwe BANCA
2 Wing Kan Fu
East Asian Australasian Flyway
Partnership
12 Min Thiha Zaw
BANCA
3 Sayam U. Chowdhury
Spoon-billed Sandpiper Task
Force
13 Toe Tat Aung
BANCA
4 Ding Li Yong
BirdLife International Asia
14 Thiri Sandar Zaw BANCA
5 Pannachet Kijja
Bird Conservation Society of
Thailand
15 Poe Ei Nyein
BANCA
6
Tee, Suchart
Daengpayon
Bird Conservation Society of
Thailand
16 Ei Thinzar Aung
BANCA
7 Chairunas Adha Putra Shorebird expert, Indonesia
17 Khaing Swe Wah BANCA
8 Chris Kelly
UK Support Group
18 Saw Mosez
BANCA
9 Pyae Phyo Aung
BANCA
19 Sa Myo Zaw
BANCA
10 Aung Kyaw Nyunt
BANCA
Total
(19) Participants
6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) and TOYOTA
Environmental Activities Grants Programme provided financial support to “Monitoring of Migratory
Shorebirds at Gulf of Mottama” Additional thank to international volunteers who have kind contribution of
their valuable time during the survey trips and Local Conservation Group members and boat drivers.
7. REFERENCES
Aung et al. (2015). Monitoring Programme for the Critically Endangered Spoon-billed Sandpiper in its
most important wintering grounds in Myanmar. unpublished report for BANCA.
Aung et al. (2016). Monitoring Programme for the Critically Endangered Spoon-billed Sandpiper in its
most important wintering grounds in Myanmar. unpublished report for BANCA.
Aung et al. (2017). Monitoring Programme for the Critically Endangered Spoon-billed Sandpiper in its
most important wintering grounds in Myanmar. unpublished report for BANCA.
Aung, P. P., Moses, S., Clark, N. A., Anderson, G. Q., Hilton, G. M., Buchanan, G. M.., Zöckler C. &
Green, R. E. (2018). Recent changes in the number of spoon-billed sandpipers Calidris pygmaea
wintering on the Upper Gulf of Mottama in Myanmar. Oryx, 1-7.
Bird watching training and survey of Critically Endangered Spoon-billed Sandpiper 2013-2014 BANCA
unpublished report.
Robson, C. 2011. New Holland field guide to the birds of South-east Asia. New Holland Publisher,
London, 544 pp.
Zöckler, C, et al. (2016). The Wintering Distribution of the Spoon-billed Sandpiper. The winter distribution
of the Spoon-billed Sandpiper Calidris pygmaeus. Bird Conservation International, Available on CJO
2016 doi:10.1017/S0959270915000295
Zöckler, C, Htin Hla, T, Clark, N, Syroechkovskiy, E, Yakushev, N, Daengphayon, S and Robinson, R
(2010). Hunting in Myanmar is probably the main cause of the decline of the Spoon-billed Sandpiper
Calidris pygmeus. Wader Study Group Bulletin 117(1): 1–8
Zöckler, C., T. Zaw Naing, S. Moses, R. Nou Soe & T. Htin Hla (2014): The importance of the Myanmar
Coast for Water Birds. Stilt 66: 37-51.
Figure 2: Map of Flyway surveyed conducted in January-February 2019.
PHOTOS TEMPLATES
Small waders flock in Gulf of Mottama
Shorebird survey
Survey boats in mudflat
Shorebird survey
Survey team members
Habitat at Gulf of Mottama
Lime 48 at Gulf of Mottama in January 2019, this
male was marked in Chukorta, Russia on 19 July
17.
White 3K at Gulf of Mottama in January 2019,
this head-started bird was marked on 7 July
2017 in Chukotka, Russia and seen in China in
2017 & 18.
Table 1: List of birds recorded at the eastern side of Gulf of Mottama between 22 January and 1 February 2019
No
Date
20-1-19 21-1-19 21-1-19
22-1-19
23-1-19
24-1-19
IUCN
Statu
s
(2017
)
ver
3.1
Koe Tae
Su
Wae
Pyan
(out)
Thaungthi
t Lay
Thaungthi
t Lay
Thaungthi
t Lay (out)
Thaungthi
t Lay
Approximate centre of survey - Latitude
17.2101
4
17.1447
2
17.13410 17.13410 17.08803 17.12819
TOTAL
Individual
s
Approximate centre of survey - Longitude
97.0065
0
96.9627
0
96.96243 96.96243 96.96939 96.96230
Common Name
Scientific Name
1.
Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa
NT
250
1020
2
180
-
300
1752
2.
Bar-tailed Godwit
NT
-
10
-
-
-
8
18
3.
Whimbrel
LC
7
41
-
13
7
6
74
4.
Eurasian Curlew
NT
40
171
100
29
101
78
519
5.
Wood Sandpiper
LC
-
5
-
1
-
-
6
6.
Terek Sandpiper
LC
-
4
-
5
H
3
12
7.
Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos
LC
10
1
-
5
-
1
17
8.
Spotted Redshank Tringa erythropus
LC
18
11
-
-
H
3
32
9.
Common Redshank Tringa totanus
LC
900
530
10
350
21
505
2316
10. Marsh Sandpiper
LC
19
26
70
15
4
61
195
11.
Common
Greenshank
LC
32
53
20
43
27
52
227
12.
Spoon-billed
Sandpiper1
Calidris pygmeus
CR
-
3
3
8
12
10
36
13.
Little Stint/red-
necked stint
Calidris spp.
LC
-
1016
500
700
1115
1293
4624
14. Long-toed Stint
LC
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
15. Dunlin
Calidris alpina
LC
-
-
-
-
2
-
2
16. Ruff
Philomachus pugnax
LC
-
3
-
6
-
13
22
17. Great Knot
EN
-
-
-
2
-
1
3
18. Curlew Sandpiper
NT
-
46
500
300
928
308
2082
19.
Broad-billed
Sandpiper
LC
-
24
600
500
301
484
1909
20. Pied Avocet
LC
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
21. Kentish Plover
LC
20
1300
1
1000
1023
1964
5308
22. Lesser Sand Plover
LC
5
220
3500
200
1242
2779
7946
23.
Greater Sand
Plover
LC
-
7
-
400
46
376
829
24.
Pacific Golden
Plover
LC
20
501
-
288
-
15
824
25. Little Ringed Plover
LC
50
32
-
20
1
3
106
26. Grey Plover
LC
-
1
2
5
1
2
11
27. Temminck's Stint
LC
-
-
-
3
-
-
3
28. Green Sandpiper
Tringa ochropus
LC
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
Total Waders counted
1371
5025
5311
4073
4831
8265
28876
Estimated Total Waders (include unidentified spp)
42000
20000
62000
29. Pallas's Gull
LC
-
-
-
6
70
3
79
30. Heuglin's Gull
Larus fuscus heuglini
LC
-
-
-
1
-
-
1
31. Brown-headed Gull
LC
-
3
23
72
20
232
350
32. Gull-billed Tern
LC
3
4
2
2
29
40
33. Caspian Tern
LC
-
-
38
4
2
-
44
34. Little Tern
Sterna albifrons
LC
14
7
-
9
2
40
72
35. Whiskered Tern
LC
5000
100
-
100
1600
-
6800
36. White-winged Tern
LC
500
300
-
10
2000
-
2810
37. Black Tern
Chlidonias niger
-
-
2
-
-
-
2
Total Gulls and Terns
5517
414
63
204
3696
304
10198
Estimated Total Gulls and Terns (Include
unidentified spp.)
5000
260
1600
6860
38. Little Egret
LC
13
4
-
9
4
5
35
39. Grey Heron
LC
32
13
-
12
4
8
69
40. Great Egret
LC
14
2
-
33
1
14
64
41. Black-headed Ibis
Threskiornis
melanocephalus
NT
10
1
-
-
-
8
19
42. Pond Heron spp.
Ardeola sp
LC
4
-
-
2
-
-
6
Total other dependent waterbirds
73
20
0
56
9
35
193
43.
Eastern Marsh
Harrier
LC
4
-
5
-
13
11
33
44. Pied Harrier
LC
4
-
1
-
-
-
5
45. Common kestrel
LC
-
1
-
-
-
-
1
46. Peregrine Falcon
LC
1
-
1
-
1
-
3
47. Black-eared Kite
Milvus lineatus
LC
12
2
2
-
-
-
16
48. Bramany Kite
LC
1
-
-
-
-
-
1
49. Booted Eagle
Hieraaetus pennatus
LC
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
50.
Greater-spotted
Eagle
Clanga clanga
LC
-
-
-
-
-
-
51.
Short-toed Snake
Eagle
Circaetus gallicus
LC
-
2
-
-
-
-
2
52.
Oriental Honey
Buzzard
Pernis ptilorhynchus
LC
1
-
-
-
-
-
1
53.
Western Marsh
Harrier
Circus aeruginosus
LC
-
1
-
-
-
-
1
Total raptors
23
6
10
0
14
11
64
Table 2: List of birds recorded at the western side of Gulf of Mottama between 22 January and 1 February 2019
No.
Date
IUCN
S
tatus 2017
22.1.2019
23.1.2019
25.1.2019
26.1.2019
27.1.2019
28.1.2019
29.1.2019
30.1.2019
31.1.2019
1.2.2019
TOTAL Individuals
Survey Area
Y
ae Din
Kyun
Garr
W
ae
P
yan
W
ae
P
yan Auk
Anaing
Auk
Baw
Ka
Gyi
Near the
M
ain
Channal Gar Auk
Gar Auk
Kyeik Hto
Approximate centre of survey – Latitude
17.23315
17.17027
17.12897
17.11254
17.07796
17.04215
17.05218
17.05
17.11329
17.26058
Approximate centre of survey – Longitude
96.87389
96.87868
96.95480
96.95432
96.93850
96.95713
96.93277
96.86
96.89838
96.91233
Common Name
Scientific Name
1.
Black-tailed Godwit
NT
617 80
60
-
3000
116
3873
2.
Bar-tailed Godwit
NT
-
-
3
3
3.
Whimbrel
LC
20
1
1
200
1
45
6
16
290
4.
Eurasian Curlew
44
20
7
5
2
78
5.
Wood Sandpiper
LC
-
-
0
6.
Terek Sandpiper
LC
-
-
1
1
6
4
15
27
7.
Common Sandpiper
LC
2
-
10
1
13
8.
Ruddy Turnstone
LC
-
-
1
1
9.
Spotted Redshank
LC
5
2
2
6
15
10.
Common Redshank
Tringa totanus
LC
178 79
430
65
44
30 240
1066
11.
Marsh Sandpiper
LC
57
39
10
2
1
109
12.
Common Greenshank Tringa nebularia
LC
20
16
10
5
2
7
6
45
111
13.
Spoon-billed
Sandpiper1
Calidris pygmeus
CR
-
5
12
9
10
5
12
4
57
14.
Long toed Stint
Calidris subminuta LC
-
-
0
15.
Little /red-necked Stint
NT
462 578 500 1500 3000 260 481 600 109 200
7690
16.
Dunlin
Calidris alpina
LC
-
1
1
17.
Ruff
Philomachus
pugnax
LC
8
4
2
1
15
18.
Great Knot
-
-
29
29
19.
Sanderling
Calidris alba
LC
-
-
1
1
2
20.
Curlew Sandpiper
103 35
100 300 230
60
57
66
951
21.
Broad-billed
Sandpiper
361 44
200 200 114
46
130
84
360
1539
22.
Kentish Plover
LC
555 916
1000 500 700 420 428 320 350 500
5689
23.
Lesser Sand Plover
LC
298
9
957
342 152 160 329 2090 800 620
8439
24.
Greater Sand Plover
LC
3
-
5
2
2
47
15
39
113
25.
Pacific Golden Plover Pluvialis fulva
LC
315
-
10
650
53
1028
26.
Little Ringed Plover
Chardrius dubius
LC
21
25
20
6
72
27.
Grey Plover
LC
2
1
1
3
7
28.
Small Pranticole
Glareola lactea
LC
300
-
300
Total Waders counted
600
5 2821 2677 2962 4940 1174 6414 1854 1680 991 30,527
Estimated total waders (include unidentified spp.)
600
0 10000
10000 5000 5000 3500 7000 6000 5000
100
0
57,500
29.
Pallas's Gull
LC
-
20
3
61
84
30.
Gull-billed Tern
LC
-
2
6
1
9
31.
Caspian Tern
LC
3
7
3
1
1
15
32.
Little Tern
Sterna albifrons
LC
1
35
15
6
57
33.
Whiskered Tern
63 1200
25
1288
34.
River Tern
Sterna aurantia
NT
-
-
2
35
35.
White-winged Tern
LC
2800
40
393
3233
36.
Whiskered/White-
winged Tern
-
-
150 200
350
Total Gulls and Terns
67 4064 161 279
32
2
171
0
544 0
5,320
Estimated total Gulls and Terns (include
unidentified spp.)
300 4000
200 500 100
200
1000
6,300
37.
Little Egret
LC
-
3
5
4
8
38.
Grey Heron
LC
6
11
3
1
2
4
20
27
39.
Great Egret
LC
-
23
4
1
28
40.
Black-headed Ibis
Threskiornis
melanocephalus
NT
32
-
32
41.
Ruddy Shelduck
Tadorna ferruginea LC
-
-
60
60
42.
Common Shelduck
Tadorna todorna LC
7
7
Total other dependent waterbirds
38
44
7
1
2
4
6
0
0
84
102
43.
Pied Harrier
LC
2
1
3
44.
Black-eared Kite
Milvus migrans
LC
-
-
2
45.
Brahminy Kite
LC
-
1
1
Total raptors
2
2
2
6

Leave a Reply