How this document has been cited
F. 2d 98 (4 Cir. 1926); or 2) he assembles his merchandise into "kits" for illegal use, or he adapts or designs it for illegal use
- in Drug Agents' Guide to Forfeiture of Assets and one similar citation
—and that the design or intent to use the thing sold in an unlawful way must be the design or intent of the seller, not of the buyer.
- in Davis v. United States, 1933 and one similar citation
It has been held that under this section the manufacture of intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes and sacramental purposes without a permit is unlawful.
- in Da Roza v. United States, 1931 and one similar citation
"We think the intention referred to in the statute (section 18) is that of the seller alone. It is his act which is made lawful or unlawful, depending upon his intention in regard to the use to be made of the article sold, provided the article is designed to carry out that purpose. The Prohibition Act (Title 2, § 3) makes the manufacture of intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes,
- in United States v. 2265 One-Gallon Paraffined Tin Cans, 1958 and one similar citation
Certainly Congress did not intend that he should be guilty of an offense because the manufacturer, if he were other than the vendor, designed the preparation, compound, and substance for an ultimate unlawful use, or because the purchaser so intended to employ it.
- in Delaware Accessories Trade Ass'n v. Gebelein, 1980 and one similar citation
The words "intended to be used" may possibly apply to the intentions of either the maker or the seller.
- in State v. Tracy, 1953
This is true whether the objects or services are restricted, or peculiarly suited for illegal use, such as a still, a gun, morphine or stolen goods.
Also all other Acts and parts of Acts, in so far as they are embraced within and superseded by this Act, are hereby repealed; the remaining portions thereof to be and remain in force with the same effect and to the same extent as if this Act had not been passed.(36 Stat. L. 1168.) Effect.
—when appeal cept something from the operative ef-has been improperly taken to Federal fect, or to qualify or restrain the gen-supreme court instead of circuit court of erality, of the substantive enactment to appeals, supreme court will transfer it to which it is attached. proper circuit court.
- in 1932 Supplement to Rose's Notes on the United States Supreme Court Reports …
Direct and exclusive review by Supreme Court of judgments rendered under Tucker Act (24 Stat. L., 505), not repealed by this section.
Cited by
271 F. 2d 593 - Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit 1959
260 F. 2d 105 - Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit 1958
492 F. Supp. 1157 - Dist. Court, ND Ohio 1980
63 F. 2d 345 - Circuit Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit 1933
53 F. 2d 219 - Dist. Court, WD Missouri 1931
33 F. 2d 225 - Circuit Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit 1929
36 F. 2d 86 - Dist. Court, ND Illinois 1929
28 F. 2d 213 - Dist. Court, D. Massachusetts 1928
[CITATION] Moore's Federal Rules Pamphlet, Part 2
JW Moore… - 2020
OH SHOPS - GEORGIA LAW REVIEW