Cannabis Sativa

How this document has been cited

The unavailability of information or records does not necessarily establish reasonable cause for failure to file timely a return.
In holding that the corporation was not entitled to a compensation deduction for the amounts paid, the Tax Court stated that "it is now settled law that only if payment is made with the intent to compensate is it deductible as compensation.... Whether such intent has been demonstrated as a factual question is to be decided on the basis of the particular facts and …
In any event, we have previously held that the unavailability of information does not constitute reasonable cause.
- in Crocker v. Commissioner, 1989 and 4 similar citations
—this Court held that the fact that an erroneous accounting method was consistently followed and was not challenged in prior years did not foreclose respondent from correcting that erroneous treatment.
The Commissioner is authorized to change a taxpayer's method of accounting when it does not clearly reflect income.
Loans between closely held corporations and their controlling shareholders are to be examined with special scrutiny.
- in KTA-Tator, Inc. v. Commissioner, 1997 and 5 similar citations
A payment to a shareholder/employee is compensation if:(a) The corporation intends the payment to be solely for services rendered by the shareholder/employee, and (b) the amount paid is reasonable as to the services rendered.
- in United States Tax Court and 3 similar citations
In analyzing whether an intent to compensate existed, we typically consider, among other factors: Whether there was corporate authorization for the payment of compensation; whether the books and records of the corporation reflected that the payments were treated as payments of compensation; whether the payments were reported to the recipients on Forms W-2 …
—the taxpayer improperly characterized capital expenditures (costs the taxpayer incurred in constructing signs with respect to which it was the lessor) as current deductions
- in PNC Bancorp, Inc. v. Commissioner, 1998 and 3 similar citations
Because Schering-Plough and its Swiss subsidiaries are related entities not acting at arms length, the Court applies "particular scrutiny because the control element suggests the opportunity to contrive a fictional [transaction]." Id
- in Schering-Plough Corp. v. US, 2009 and 2 similar citations

Cited by

154 F. 3d 61 - Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit 1998
110 TC 349 - Tax Court 1998
91 TC 371 - Tax Court 1988
832 F. 2d 436 - Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit 1987
733 F. 2d 191 - Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit 1984
72 TC 793 - Tax Court 1979
2023 TC Memo 91 - Tax Court 2023
2024 TC Memo 3 - Tax Court 2024

Leave a Reply