Cannabis Sativa

How this document has been cited

—"a product feature is functional... if it is essential to the use or purpose of the article or if it affects the cost or quality of the article."
- in Antioch Co. v. Western Trimming Corp., 2003 and 802 similar citations
A mark has secondary meaning if "in the minds of public, the primary significance of a product feature or term is to identify the source of the product rather than the product itself."
"[A] manufacturer or distributor [who][(1)] intentionally induces another to infringe a trademark, or...[(2)] continues to supply its product to one whom it knows or has reason to know is engaging in trademark infringement,... is contributorially responsible for any harm done as a result of the deceit."
- in SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. v. Lafayette, 2018 and 378 similar citations
—the Court said that contributory trademark liability is applicable if defendant (1) intentionally induces another to infringe on a trademark or (2) continues to supply a product knowing that the recipient is using the product to engage in trademark infringement.
- in Fonovisa, Inc. v. Cherry Auction, Inc., 1996 and 46 similar citations
Determining the weight and credibility of the evidence is the special province of the trier of fact, and, "unless an appellate court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed, it must accept the trial court's findings."
The Supreme Court has determined that liability can extend "beyond those who actually mislabel goods with the mark of another."

Cited by

600 F. 3d 93 - Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2010
Dist. Court, SD New York 2008
576 F. Supp. 2d 463 - Dist. Court, SD New York 2008
747 F. 2d 844 - Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit 1984
547 F. Supp. 1095 - Dist. Court, D. New Jersey 1982
696 F. 3d 206 - Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2012
500 F. Supp. 2d 770 - Dist. Court, ND Illinois 2007
194 F. 3d 980 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1999
932 F. 3d 1303 - Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit 2019

Leave a Reply