Cannabis Sativa

How this document has been cited

It is said that the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment means at least that "[n] either a state nor the Federal Government*** can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another
- in Grumet v. Bd. of Educ., 1993 and 533 similar citations
As such, the Establishment Clause "was intended to erect a wall of separation between Church and State."
—sustaining local ordinance authorizing all parents to deduct from their state tax returns the costs of transporting their children to school on public buses
The "touchstone" of the Establishment Clause is the principle that the "First Amendment mandates governmental neutrality between religion and religion, and between religion and nonreligion."
- in Hinrichs v. Bosma, 2005 and 86 similar citations
—holding that the Establishment Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
- in Turner v. Habersham County, Georgia, 2003 and 94 similar citations
"The `establishment of religion'clause of the First Amendment means at least this: Neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another***. No tax in any amount, large or small, can be levied to support any religious activities or institutions, whatever they may be …
- in Epeldi v. Engelking, 1971 and 399 similar citations
Finally, our reluctance to address constitutional issues in this context is significantly tempered because we are concerned with a potential violation of the separation between religious matters and the judiciary guaranteed by the First Amendment. "The First Amendment has erected a wall between church and state. That wall must be kept high and impregnable. We could …
- in Ball v. Ball, 2020 and 107 similar citations
In attempting to recast Madison's opposition as having principally been targeted against "governmental preferences for particular religious faiths," ante, at 4 (emphasis in original), Justice Thomas wishes to wage a battle that was lost long ago, for "this Court has rejected unequivocally the contention that the Establishment Clause forbids only governmental preference of …
Nonbelievers, Presbyterians, or the members of any other faith, because of their faith, or lack of it, from receiving the benefits of public welfare legislation. While we do not mean to intimate that a state could not provide transportation only to children attending public schools, we must be careful, in protecting the citizens of New Jersey against state-established churches, to …
- in Epeldi v. Engelking, 1971 and 70 similar citations
The Court recounted the history of religious divisiveness and persecution in England and in the early colonies, concluding that the Establishment Clause erects a “wall of separation between Church and State” that would forbid the use of public funds to support religious institutions

Cited by

530 US 793 - Supreme Court 2000
Discusses cited case at length[CITATION] Ewald v. Committee for Public Education
93 S. Ct. 2955 - Supreme Court 1973
488 P. 2d 860 - Idaho: Supreme Court 1971
424 Pa. 202 - Pa: Supreme Court 1967
271 F. Supp. 1 - Dist. Court, SD New York 1967
895 SE 2d 705 - Va: Supreme Court 2023
536 US 639 - Supreme Court 2002
472 US 38 - Supreme Court 1985

Leave a Reply