Cannabis Sativa

How this document has been cited

From an early time in our national history, the Federal Government has used its enumerated powers, such as its power to regulate interstate commerce, for the purpose of protecting public morality—for example, by banning the interstate shipment of lottery tickets, or the interstate transport of women for immoral purposes.
- in Gonzales v. Oregon, 2006 and 35 similar citations
—the Supreme Court held that "lottery tickets are subjects of traffic and therefore are subjects of commerce, and the regulation of the carriage of such tickets from State to State... is a regulation of commerce among the several states."
- in Pic-A-State PA, Inc. v. Reno, 1996 and 31 similar citations
—the Court rejected the argument that Congress lacked power to prohibit the interstate movement of lottery tickets because it had power only to regulate, not to prohibit.
- in United States v. Lopez, 1995 and 37 similar citations
The power to regulate interstate commerce "extends not only to those regulations which aid, foster and protect the commerce, but embraces those which prohibit it."
- in Gonzales v. Raich, 2005 and 38 similar citations
T] he Constitution.... leaves to Congress a large discretion as to the means that may be employed in executing a given power
- in US v. Comstock, 2010 and 30 similar citations
Compare cases in which the commerce power has been used to advance other ends not entirely commercial
An appropriate exercise by a state of its police power is consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment although it results in serious depreciation of property values; and the United States may, consistently with the Fifth Amendment, impose for a permitted purpose restrictions upon property which produce like results.
- in Calhoun v. Massie, 1920 and 18 similar citations
But the Supreme Court has consistently held that the Necessary and Proper Clause provides Congress "implied power to criminalize any conduct that might interfere with the exercise of an enumerated power."
- in US v. Carel, 2011 and 16 similar citations
—in stating the previously settled doctrine on the subject it was said, p. 492: "The power to regulate commerce with foreign nations is expressly conferred upon Congress, and being an enumerated power is complete in itself, acknowledging no limitations other than those prescribed in the Constitution.
- in Brolan v. United States, 1915 and 19 similar citations
—the plaintiff recovered damages for breach of the condition of merchantability of beer which was contaminated by arsenic.
- in Atiyah and Adams' sale of goods and 20 similar citations

Cited by

Discusses cited case at length[CITATION] Burke v. Blair
265 US 545 - Supreme Court 1924
350 F. 3d 247 - Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit 2003
509 US 418 - Supreme Court 1993
345 US 22 - Supreme Court 1953
64 F. 2d 485 - Circuit Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 1933
265 US 545 - Supreme Court 1924
231 US 495 - Supreme Court 1913
208 US 161 - Supreme Court 1908
570 US 387 - Supreme Court 2013
Supreme Court 2013

Leave a Reply