Page 9 of 90 results (0.03 sec)
Culpepper v. Ocheltree
256 US 483, 41 S. Ct. 579, 65 L. Ed. 1054 - Supreme Court, 1921 - Google Scholar
Mr. Samuel Herrick, with whom Mr. Henry M. Willis was on the brief, for petitioner … MR. JUSTICE
VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the court … This case is in all material respects like …
VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the court … This case is in all material respects like …
Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. Bondurant
257 US 282, 42 S. Ct. 106, 66 L. Ed. 239 - Supreme Court, 1921 - Google Scholar
… v. Hancock, 253 US 284; Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co. v. Di Donato, 256 US 327; Philadelphia
& Reading Ry. Co. v. Polk, 256 US 332. [2] See eg, Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co …
& Reading Ry. Co. v. Polk, 256 US 332. [2] See eg, Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co …
Gilpin v. United States
256 US 10, 41 S. Ct. 419, 65 L. Ed. 807 - Supreme Court, 1921 - Google Scholar
This case was argued and submitted with the Chase Case, No. 242, ante, 1. It is a suit by Mary
Gilpin by her next friend to have adjudged to her a right to an allotment of lands in the Omaha …
Gilpin by her next friend to have adjudged to her a right to an allotment of lands in the Omaha …
United Fuel Gas Co. v. Hallahan
257 US 277, 42 S. Ct. 105, 66 L. Ed. 234 - Supreme Court, 1921 - Google Scholar
… The plaintiff drew in question the validity of the statute "as construed and applied," Merchants'
National Bank v. Richmond, 256 US 635, and took this writ of error …
National Bank v. Richmond, 256 US 635, and took this writ of error …
Alabama & Vicksburg R. Co. v. Journey
257 US 111, 42 S. Ct. 6, 66 L. Ed. 154 - Supreme Court, 1921 - Google Scholar
… That it 114 did err is clear from what we said in Missouri Pacific RR Co. v. Ault, 256 US
554, decided since entry of the judgment under review. Section …
554, decided since entry of the judgment under review. Section …
Ex parte Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co.
257 US 6, 42 S. Ct. 2, 66 L. Ed. 101 - Supreme Court, 1921 - Google Scholar
… Petitioner asks a rehearing of this matter and a reconsideration of our decision of June 1, 1921,
256 US 512, by which we refused to award a mandamus requiring the Judge of the …
256 US 512, by which we refused to award a mandamus requiring the Judge of the …
Oklahoma v. Texas
257 US 308, 42 S. Ct. 167, 66 L. Ed. 252 - Supreme Court, 1921 - Google Scholar
… subject-matter. 309 Approving report of Special Master on certain claims, and directing
payments by Receiver, etc. See 256 US 603. Upon consideration …
payments by Receiver, etc. See 256 US 603. Upon consideration …
Alaska Fish Salting & By-Products Co. v. Smith
255 US 44, 41 S. Ct. 219, 65 L. Ed. 489 - Supreme Court, 1921 - Google Scholar
255 US 44 (1921). ALASKA FISH SALTING & BY-PRODUCTS COMPANY v. SMITH. No. 166.
Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 20, 21, 1921. Decided January 31, 1921 …
Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 20, 21, 1921. Decided January 31, 1921 …
Silver King Coalition Mines Co. v. Conkling Mining Co.
255 US 151, 41 S. Ct. 310, 65 L. Ed. 561 - Supreme Court, 1921 - Google Scholar
255 US 151 (1921). SILVER KING COALITION MINES COMPANY v. CONKLING MINING
COMPANY. Nos. 158, 187. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 19, 1921 …
COMPANY. Nos. 158, 187. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 19, 1921 …
St. Louis & SF Ry. v. Pub. Serv. Comm.
254 US 535, 41 S. Ct. 192, 65 L. Ed. 389 - Supreme Court, 1921 - Google Scholar
254 US 535 (1921). ST. LOUIS & SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE
COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 117. Supreme Court of United States …
COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 117. Supreme Court of United States …