Page 6 of about 711 results (0.10 sec)
Norton v. Dyersburg
127 US 160, 8 S. Ct. 1111, 32 L. Ed. 85 - Supreme Court, 1888 - Google Scholar
It is insisted by the plaintiff in error that there was express legislative authority for the issue of
these bonds. The first statute relied on is the act of the legislature of Tennessee, approved January …
these bonds. The first statute relied on is the act of the legislature of Tennessee, approved January …
RoBards v. Lamb
127 US 58, 8 S. Ct. 1031, 32 L. Ed. 60 - Supreme Court, 1888 - Google Scholar
The only question, among those presented, of which this court can take cognizance, is whether
the statute of Missouri, which authorizes a special administrator having charge of the estate of …
the statute of Missouri, which authorizes a special administrator having charge of the estate of …
Culbertson v. H. Witbeck Co.
127 US 326, 8 S. Ct. 1136, 32 L. Ed. 134 - Supreme Court, 1888 - Google Scholar
The object of the suit was to recover certain lands situated in the county of Marquette, to which
the plaintiff claimed title in fee. The case was removed to the Circuit Court of the United …
the plaintiff claimed title in fee. The case was removed to the Circuit Court of the United …
Stuart v. Gay
127 US 518, 8 S. Ct. 1279, 32 L. Ed. 191 - Supreme Court, 1888 - Google Scholar
The appellant cannot justly complain of the decree for a resale on the ground that it was rendered
upon a rule to show cause. It does not appear that he was or could have been prejudiced by …
upon a rule to show cause. It does not appear that he was or could have been prejudiced by …
St. Paul Plough Works v. Starling
127 US 376, 8 S. Ct. 1327, 32 L. Ed. 251 - Supreme Court, 1888 - Google Scholar
The original action was brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota
by a citizen of Nebraska against a corporation of Minnesota, for breach of an agreement in …
by a citizen of Nebraska against a corporation of Minnesota, for breach of an agreement in …
Forncrook v. Root
127 US 176, 8 S. Ct. 1247, 32 L. Ed. 97 - Supreme Court, 1888 - Google Scholar
"Be it known that I, James Forncrook, of Watertown, in the county of Jefferson and State of
Wisconsin, have invented certain new and useful improvements in sectional honey-frames, and …
Wisconsin, have invented certain new and useful improvements in sectional honey-frames, and …
Flower v. Detroit
127 US 563, 8 S. Ct. 1291, 32 L. Ed. 175 - Supreme Court, 1888 - Google Scholar
This is a suit in equity, brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District
of Michigan, by James 564 Flower, Thomas Flower, and George Flower, against the City of …
of Michigan, by James 564 Flower, Thomas Flower, and George Flower, against the City of …
Porter v. White
127 US 235, 8 S. Ct. 1217, 32 L. Ed. 112 - Supreme Court, 1888 - Google Scholar
This is a bill in equity, filed in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, by Richard H. Porter
against Stephen V. White. The case arises as follows: On the 4th of July, 1868, a convention …
against Stephen V. White. The case arises as follows: On the 4th of July, 1868, a convention …
Jenkins v. International Bank of Chicago
127 US 484, 8 S. Ct. 1196, 32 L. Ed. 189 - Supreme Court, 1888 - Google Scholar
It is contended by the plaintiff in error that the Supreme Court of Illinois erred in giving effect in
this suit to the decree of February 28, 1878, in the Wilshire suit as set up by the International …
this suit to the decree of February 28, 1878, in the Wilshire suit as set up by the International …
Craig v. Leitensdorfer
127 US 764, 8 S. Ct. 1393, 32 L. Ed. 322 - Supreme Court, 1888 - Google Scholar
The circumstances of the case are about these. Craig and Leitensdorfer had been litigating for
an immense tract of land in Colorado, and the case had come here by appeal in behalf of Craig …
an immense tract of land in Colorado, and the case had come here by appeal in behalf of Craig …