Page 2 of about 67 results (0.02 sec)
Kidd v. Alabama
188 US 730, 23 S. Ct. 401, 47 L. Ed. 669 - Supreme Court, 1903 - Google Scholar
This is an action for taxes brought by the State of Alabama against the executrix of the will of
a citizen of Alabama. It appears on the record that the property in dispute is stock in 731 railroads …
a citizen of Alabama. It appears on the record that the property in dispute is stock in 731 railroads …
Kelley v. Rhoads
188 US 1, 23 S. Ct. 259, 47 L. Ed. 359 - Supreme Court, 1903 - Google Scholar
The question to be determined, then, is, whether the stock of the plaintiff was brought into the
State for the purpose of being grazed at the time it was assessed for taxation. This question must …
State for the purpose of being grazed at the time it was assessed for taxation. This question must …
Prout v. Starr
188 US 537, 23 S. Ct. 398, 47 L. Ed. 584 - Supreme Court, 1903 - Google Scholar
"Within the meaning of the Eleventh Amendment of the Constitution, these suits are not against
the State, but against certain individuals charged with the administration of a state 543 …
the State, but against certain individuals charged with the administration of a state 543 …
Cummings v. Chicago
188 US 410, 23 S. Ct. 472, 47 L. Ed. 525 - Supreme Court, 1903 - Google Scholar
1. We hold that the Circuit Court had jurisdiction in this case. That the parties, plaintiffs and
defendant, are citizens of the same State is not sufficient to defeat the jurisdiction; for by the act …
defendant, are citizens of the same State is not sufficient to defeat the jurisdiction; for by the act …
Hale v. Allinson
188 US 56, 23 S. Ct. 244, 47 L. Ed. 380 - Supreme Court, 1903 - Google Scholar
Of the several grounds of demurrer to the bill herein, only two need be specially noticed. They
are (1) that this complainant (receiver) has no right to sue in the courts of a State foreign to that …
are (1) that this complainant (receiver) has no right to sue in the courts of a State foreign to that …
Northern Pacific R. Co. v. Soderberg
188 US 526, 23 S. Ct. 365, 47 L. Ed. 575 - Supreme Court, 1903 - Google Scholar
1. Motion was made to dismiss this appeal for the reason that, as the jurisdiction of the Circuit
Court was invoked upon the ground of diverse citizenship, the decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals …
Court was invoked upon the ground of diverse citizenship, the decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals …
Tarrance v. Florida
188 US 519, 23 S. Ct. 402, 47 L. Ed. 572 - Supreme Court, 1903 - Google Scholar
"We do not contend that the colored men are discriminated against by any law of this State in
the selection of names for jury duty, nor do we contend that a negro being tried for a criminal …
the selection of names for jury duty, nor do we contend that a negro being tried for a criminal …
Helwig v. United States
188 US 605, 23 S. Ct. 427, 47 L. Ed. 614 - Supreme Court, 1903 - Google Scholar
It has been heretofore held that the act conferred exclusive jurisdiction upon the District Court
in suits for penalties or forfeitures. The early cases to that effect are cited in United States v …
in suits for penalties or forfeitures. The early cases to that effect are cited in United States v …
Diamond Match Co. v. Ontonagon
188 US 82, 23 S. Ct. 266, 47 L. Ed. 394 - Supreme Court, 1903 - Google Scholar
2. To sustain this proposition would embarrass the power of the State — indeed, make it impotent
to deal with the conditions there existing. The statute, no doubt, was enacted as a means to subject …
to deal with the conditions there existing. The statute, no doubt, was enacted as a means to subject …
Williams v. Parker
188 US 491, 23 S. Ct. 440, 47 L. Ed. 559 - Supreme Court, 1903 - Google Scholar
Counsel for plaintiffs in error state in their brief that "the single question in the case is,
substantially, whether it is consistent with due process of law for a court to decree the actual destruction …
substantially, whether it is consistent with due process of law for a court to decree the actual destruction …