| If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kernow}} to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here). |
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Kernow[edit]
Fresh
- Kernow (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Rabidfoxes (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) - see earliest contributions [1]
Stale
- Jonty303 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) indef blocked
- LosingTheGame (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) indef blocked
- LosingTheGame2 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) indef blocked
- LosingTheGame (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) indef blocked
- JontyHaywood (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) indef blocked
- Code letter: F, G
- Supporting evidence:
Kernow admits to being Jonty303,[2] and has requested an unblock, saying that they have not engaged in any recent socking. Rabidfoxes was blocked tagged as a sock of Jonty303 and has edited as recently as a month ago. If there is a technical connection, obviously the unblock will be declined. I'd also like to know if there are any other sleeper socks out there. If there is no technical connection, we will have to look at behaviors, because 
CheckUser is not magic pixie dust. Jehochman Talk 16:24, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- Note While Kernow denies knowledge of the LosingTheGame accounts, this edit suggests otherwise. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:40, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- Kernow is asking us to believe that those edits were done by someone impersonating him, which he has explicitly said. I don't know if it's true. Regardless, though, technical data would help us get an idea if Kernow is being honest or deceptive if it's available. I note, btw, that Rabidfoxes is not actually blocked. Mangojuicetalk 19:07, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Unlikely Currently available technical evidence implies that a relationship between User:Rabidfoxes and User:Kernow is unlikely. -- Avi (talk) 04:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- Kernow is asking us to believe that those edits were done by someone impersonating him, which he has explicitly said. I don't know if it's true. Regardless, though, technical data would help us get an idea if Kernow is being honest or deceptive if it's available. I note, btw, that Rabidfoxes is not actually blocked. Mangojuicetalk 19:07, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.