The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:43, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a screenshot of Rozen Maiden; The character itself isn't free either way.

Not sure how to do this. (If I screwed up, I'd appreciate if you could fix it rather than contacting me. I likely won't have this IP again within a day or so) 209.90.135.31 (talk) 03:35, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned book logo - no source - if legit uploader would probably not be (c) holder, if not legit, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:56, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:42, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned currency image - not PD Skier Dude (talk) 04:02, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:43, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tag claims PD, contrary to the description which indicates it to be by permission to Wikipedia only. I am unable to check the source as I do not read Swahili. AJCham 08:25, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:43, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a screenshot from a TV show. The person who uploaded it only made two edits to Wikipedia – uploading the image and adding it to the article – in 2007 so probably didn't know about proper licencing of screenshots. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 10:19, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUF or at my talk page. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

reason Alanthom81 (talk) 16:02, 23 October 2009 (UTC) I'm the photographer who made this picture of the late Allan Schaiberg. I made it in Brattleboro, VT, on 14 July 2007. I am happy to have it appear here on Wikipedia and have attached a Creative Commons license. I have been in direct email contact with DASonnenfeld, who originally uploaded the photograph, and as proof that I made the photo I sent him another photo from the same shoot. I can be contacted through my website, http://www.alan-thomas.com. I am new to the protocols for uploading and crediting images on Wikipedia and welcome instructions if there's anything more I need to do.[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Zscout370 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Finnish Defence Forces press release photos are not free, which has been repeatedly noted at commons. See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Template:FinnishDefenceForces and Commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/FDF_press_release_photos. Thus, even this picture is unfree. There is an ample variety of free alternative photos, so not even fair use applies. MPorciusCato (talk) 19:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.