The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Viareggio (beach soccer)[edit]

Viareggio (beach soccer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, removed without any particular rationale. Unsourced article on a beach soccer team which a search (in which regard I freely admit to an inability to read Italian) only appears to give run-of-the-mill information confirming that the team exists. There is a claim to notability in that they've won a European competition, but I note that that competition also doesn't appear to have much in the way of coverage, although it's hampered by having a name that makes it a challenge to search for "cleanly". BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:03, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:54, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- the only "source" given is the org's Facebook page. I'd expect an editor to try a little harder when starting articles. No reason to keep this one; no usable content would be lost. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 16:32, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - lack of independent sources Spiderone 16:32, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 17:13, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not seeing any evidence their continental victory has garnered sufficient independent coverage to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 15:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.