The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 _{(ICE-T • ICE CUBE)} 02:50, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This Christmas (Jessie James Decker EP)[edit]

This Christmas (Jessie James Decker EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While it charted, I was unable to find a single review or even the most superficial of coverage. The current sources are a gossip piece about Jessie James Decker that mentions the album in passing, combined with the chart positions and a blank directory listing on AllMusic. Redirect and PROD were both contested without comment. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:46, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:46, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or merge - Keep or merge, but do not delete history. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:55, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  WP:JUSTAVOTE. For what reason do you want it kept? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:10, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply - Whatever keeps the history of this decently sourced article in tact. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:22, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I must point out here that if preserving history is the basis of the argument, then the recommendation should be to redirect to the musician's article (or their discography article if there is one) rather than merge. Imagine the ramifications of a musician's biography article in which the details, tracklist, etc. of one album are crammed into the history awkwardly while their other albums have separate articles. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:42, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Why is it that you always comment that things were "contested without comment" when that is not true? User:Jax 0677 removed the PROD with the comment "can be redirected" and I reversed the redirect with the comment "AfD it". Both of those are COMMENTS. Stop lying in your deletion rationale please. DonaldD23 talk to me 21:27, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD discussion has been proposed for merger to Jessie James Decker, and a notice of the proposed merger was posted to that page on June 22, 2022. As such, this AfD discussion may need to be extended or relisted to incorporate input from that page.

• Keep - The album is indeed low on reviews but it reached respectable levels in the Billboard charts and has a few moderately in-depth announcements in the valid country music press like this: [1]. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:46, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – Charting album, and I added one review from the London Free Press which was also republished in the Sun chain newspapers: the Toronto Sun (December 15, 2015), the Ottawa Sun, the Winnipeg Sun and the Edmonton Sun (all on December 13, 2015). Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Meets WP:NALBUM per above arguments. SBKSPP (talk) 09:01, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.