The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And salt given the previous deletions Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thailand national under-14 football team[edit]

Thailand national under-14 football team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion per WP:G4 was declined because some of the minutiae of the article are different; the subject however is not. The same notability concerns of failing WP:GNG from three years ago still apply. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:50, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I think it is great the kids are involved in sports at a young age. But the article lacks reliable sources and notable media coverage.Knox490 (talk) 13:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 15:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 15:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Youth football teams are not usually notable unless there is something exceptional that means they pass GNG, I see nothing exceptional here Seasider91 (talk) 15:09, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not seeing anything to suggest notabilty. Simply existing at this level isn't enough. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - the article is poorly sourced and just seems to be an arbitrary list of records, with nothing pass WP:N mentioned. I would really like to expand Wikipedia's coverage of less well known football teams and tournaments, but unfortunately this is not notable enough yet. Inter&anthro (talk) 03:30, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and SALT, no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 18:14, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 05:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.