The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:08, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sporting Lisburn F.C[edit]

Sporting Lisburn F.C (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Amateur football club with no significant reliable coverage in third-party sources. Plainly fails the notability test. Pichpich (talk) 23:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:24, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:24, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:24, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete : Might even qualify for WP:A7 Coderzombie (talk) 09:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 07:48, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 08:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the team has competed in a national competition. No indication of wider GNG. Fenix down (talk) 13:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.