The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Taylor Wilsdon[edit]

Scott Taylor Wilsdon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a practicing lawyer, all refs are for cases litigated by the individual. I can't find mentions of him outside of various court cases. Oaktree b (talk) 15:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 15:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and California. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I find nothing beyond the sources in the article, none of which establish notability: links to his court cases, and promotional reviews on justia.com. I note that the article was created by an SPA. I suspect COI. Lamona (talk) 21:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. I did not find significant coverage in my searches for sources. The subject does not meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. Cunard (talk) 08:12, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.