The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. / IAR Potentially disruptive, but definitely invalid nomination. We're not spending seven days on this. Star Mississippi 15:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sargent (film)[edit]

Sargent (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Found no reliable sourcing to support the article. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:28, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Entertainment, and Pakistan. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:28, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Rather Keep: the review on the page, from Daily Jang, mentions a big box office success in Pakistan, among other things. — MY, OH MY!  (mushy yank) — 14:39, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - You seem to have very poor knowledge of Pakistani sources. See WP:PKRS for reliable and unreliable sources. Insight 3 (talk) 15:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.