The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:26, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rhian Brewster[edit]

Rhian Brewster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not much has changed since this article was deleted five months ago. Brewster has since played a post friendly for Liverpool, but he's still not appeared in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article still fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:04, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:04, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Kosack (talk) 07:01, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - a classic case of WP:TOOSOON, article can easily be re-created when subject of the article meets WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. However as the nominator correctly mentions nothing much has changed since the last time this article was nominated to improve notability. Inter&anthro (talk) 04:19, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and recreate if he actually does play a first team game for Liverpool. Govvy (talk) 09:48, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I know it is a long shot but can't you say that because he has had significant covergae due to the under 17 world cup and is one of England's main/best players so far he has become notable. User:Rickyc123 (talk) 09:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per the reasons put forward by Inter&anthro above. Liam E. Bekker (talk) 08:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and SALT, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 17:47, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - still does not meet the requirements of WP:NFOOTBALL or WP:GNG. Kosack (talk) 06:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, TOOSOON, NFOOTBALL and ANYBIO. ClubOranje^T 11:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Unless someone chops his legs off he is going to play professionally at a high level. What's the point of deleting the article on a technicality when it will have to be re-created in about three months time? Tigerboy1966  21:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Wikipedia is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL. Until he actually plays a senior fixture, he does not meet notability requirements like any other non-notable youth player. If he does play professionally, his article can be easily restored by an admin. Kosack (talk) 21:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment added content from the FIFA site, The Guardian and Liverpool Echo. Looks awfully like GNG to me. Tigerboy1966  21:45, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks somewhat WP:ROUTINE to me. ClubOranje^T 22:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed with ClubOranje, the Guardian and FIFA links are just match reports for youth matches so WP:ROUTINE. The Liverpool Echo source is a start but nowhere near enough on its own. Kosack (talk) 22:32, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- WP:TOOSOON and the sourcing looks routine. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NFOOTY failure. Number 57 08:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.