The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. With five deletes and only three weak Keeps, I don't think I can close this as anything other than delete. ClubOranje makes, I think, a good point about the two articles. Black Kite (talk) 21:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rachmat Irianto[edit]

Rachmat Irianto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was that he is Yet to appear in a fully professional league. Not meeting WP:NFOOTY. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:20, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:21, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NFOOTY Seasider91 (talk) 14:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 16:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 16:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 08:41, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep - Although the player doesn't pass WP:NFOOTY, it does seem to pass WP:GNG, with multiple reliable sources (albeit not in English) that discuss this player. RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 17:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep - per the above, the article already lists two sources which seem like significant non-routine coverage and a google search indicates that this is probably not all there is. Fenix down (talk) 10:53, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete if a footballer does not pass the notability guidelines for footballers, the article should only be kept if they are notable for some non-football related thing, which this subject is not.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:07, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails subject specific guidelines WP:NFOOTBALL. A case of WP:TOOSOON. Some coverage but I consider it all WP:ROUTINE and it largely generated due to him being the son of a notable Indonesian international, which makes it human interest not notability per WP:NOTINHERITED. ClubOranje^T 00:11, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Fails WP:FOOTY but may scrape through WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.