The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Swedish sources indicate notability. Bishonen | talk 00:11, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peshraw Azizi[edit]

Peshraw Azizi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:56, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:56, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 20:36, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - at least two of the references in the Swedish version of the article meet WP:GNG. These are here (which is more than just a contract renewal notice) and here. Interestingly the one comments about "now that he is nationally famous". Not sure what that's about. Looking in Google News - this is quite substantial here. This here isn't, but might hint at why he's "famous" - looks like he was in Kurdistan during a terror attack. This looks as though it meets GNG here. Oh, this one is very strong here. Easily meets GNG. There's hundreds if not thousands of hits. Nfitz (talk) 05:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Nfitz (talk) 05:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Fails WP:GNG & WP:NFOOTBALL. JMHamo (talk) 10:32, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Sources presented above seem to indicate GNG through the provision of detailed interviews with the player and articles on him that go beyond routine match reporting. Fenix down (talk) 14:24, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - per Nfitz's comments, I have gone on google too and seen a couple sources about this footballer. What is needed now is that these are integrated and the article content is expanded. Article needs improvement not deleting. Inter&anthro (talk) 17:00, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. There's nothing on this guy that meets WP:GNG. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL. At best you could merge him to Dalkurd FF. SW3 5DL (talk) 17:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. There are many reports about Azizi, but in Swedish. I don't understand Swedish. I wonder if the voters understand Swedish to discern notability. It seems he is the team captain. Jack N. Stock (talk) 02:58, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete clearly does not meet the notability guidelines for footballers. The other references are just not indepth enough to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:30, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Per WP:GNG. Sources does point towards notability. The subject also has a Swedish Wiki article which is in better shape. The article is short and needs improvement and expansion, not deletion. AfD is not a clean-up service and we dont delete articles based on its size or shape but purely guidelines.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:38, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Meets GNG as per sources provided above.. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 03:20, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment, so just to confirm, Azizi does not meet WP:NFOOTBALL as the team(s) he plays in are in the 2nd tier national leagues not the premier, ie. Superettan not Allsvenskan. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:55, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, however, the discussion is centred more around whether the sources presented above by Nfitz indicate GNG. Fenix down (talk) 10:12, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.