The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:52, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pavle Stanimirovic[edit]

Pavle Stanimirovic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NAUTHOR, WP:BLPCRIME, WP:NJOURNALIST and most importantly WP:ANYBIO. John from Idegon (talk) 01:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• DELETE This article certainly fails WP:PERPETRATOR, but the fellow has a lot of media coverage... I'm somewhat conflicted, but I say 'delete' because there is not a lot of coverage that isn't incidental (i.e. he happens to be referenced as an 'expert' on a specific crime group in a few articles). - zfJames Please ping me in your reply on this page (chat page , contribs) 01:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Indeed, my thought exactly. There's a clear failure of notability due to his criminal history, a clear failure of notability pertaining to him being an author and all other coverage of him is simply name checking. There is nothing even faintly resembling coverage in detail in multiple reliable sources, totally independent of the subject. John from Idegon (talk) 02:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:09, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:09, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:09, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:09, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:09, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. Being called an "expert" in some interviews doesn't make one notable (Just because a show calls you an expert doesn't make you one). Interviews about famous people etc don't do it. This is someone who hovers near notability, but isn't there. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:39, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - being called to comment on some news program, absent significant coverage of himself, is meaningless. Bearian (talk) 21:12, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.