The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Najeeb Hamza[edit]

Najeeb Hamza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. No concern was given for proposal, hence the objection. However, Hamza has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG.

The article may also be eligible for speedy deletion per WP:G7 since it was blanked several times, including by the author. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 08:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 15:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Nfitz (talk) 23:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails all relevant criteria Spiderone 12:10, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:NFOOTY and would possibly recommend speedy as well as per nominator. Inter&anthro (talk) 02:56, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - He does not seem to meet the notability criteria for WP:NFOOTBALL.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.