Cannabis Sativa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:39, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mislav Maretić[edit]

Mislav Maretić (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable soccer (sorry, footy!) player for a non-notable youth team. No coverage whatsoever in RS and I don't see anything that indicates he meets WP:NFOOTY. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  15:39, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  15:39, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  15:39, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:53, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 20:40, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 08:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 12:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails both criteria; could meet criteria in future so could be recreated then Spiderone 17:47, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply