Cannabis Sativa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails the subject specific guideline. No consensus that the sources provided below are sufficient for GNG. Appears he has received only passing mentions in media. Agree this is probably a case of WP:TOOSOON. Fenix down (talk) 09:54, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lassana Faye[edit]

Lassana Faye (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion per WP:G4 was rejected on the grounds that he has now played in the KNVB Cup. The cup appearance was not against a fully-pro-league club, meaning it does not confer notability per WP:NFOOTY. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:18, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:18, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and SALT - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 21:26, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wouldn't go as far as SALTing the article. It's only been deleted once before and created again in good faith. --Jimbo[online] 14:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I wouldn't go as far as salting though, he has been in the youth teams of many top division dutch teams and is now in the senior squad at SBV Vitesse, playing in one game in the cup. He is only 18 and I would be highly suprised if he still fails WP:NFOOTY in a years time. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 09:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep played in the KNVB Cup and articles like : 1, 2, 3 to start indicate WP:SPORTCRIT. Article could use expansion and improved referencing, not repeated deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 06:21, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 22:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leave a Reply