The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:27, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Hodgson (historian)[edit]

Jack Hodgson (historian) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failure to meet 'sources' and 'independent of the subject' criteria in the general notability guideline. Previous nomination was removed by an editor (User:Historygeek2207), who might potentially be the subject, in bad faith. An overwhelming majority of the references are indeed primary (18/24 if I'm counting correctly), while most of the others (like the Orcid or the newsletter) do not really attest to the notability of the subject. In addition, as I pointed out in the article's talk page, I think the editor's work on this article might go against the WP:NOTYOU policy, given that a majority of their contributions consist of working on this article specifically, and most of their other contributions involve the insertion of references to the subject's work on other entries. Demoxica (talk) 20:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, History, Spain, England, and United States of America. Skynxnex (talk) 20:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  DeleteNo articles about him, only things he's written. This in WaPo [1] is typical of what I find. Oaktree b (talk) 01:57, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- Still a young academic who may be notable one day. He has completed a PhD and written four articles based on it and a few book reviews. In my view that is not enough for notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:PROF and WP:TOOSOON, subject to re-creation with further academic work. We almost never keep associate professors. Bearian (talk) 13:50, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I thought perhaps his works were highly cited per WP:PROF, but it appears not. ResonantDis_tortion 07:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.