The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:47, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hellointern[edit]

Hellointern (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had PRODded this with the rationale "Does not pass WP:CORP or WP:N only one of the sources is about the company, the rest are columns by company employees. No significant coverage for the finding either." The article was deleted but then restored after that as a contested PROD. I think the same rationale still applies. —SpacemanSpiff 03:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 03:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 03:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 03:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete. The website receives good web traffic and there are sources that are relevant in its country of origin. An equivalent website based in the U.S. would, probably, be overwhelmingly kept and I think it's important to avoid cultural bias. There seems to be slightly too little coverage to keep it, but I'd not object to it. KaisaL (talk) 18:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:40, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.