The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 18:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Estonia national under-21 football team results[edit]

Estonia national under-21 football team results (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe this meets WP:LISTN. The team's competitive results are already detailed at the various competition articles. There are many lists of results for many full national teams, but far fewer for age-group teams. (see Category:National association football team results) I think this reflects the fact that the results of a full national team are inherently notable, but not their age-group teams. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 15:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Not a question of the list being inherently notable, their matches seem to get plenty of coverage in Estonian media here, plus international media coverage such as here, so seem to satisfy LISTN. That the team's competitive matches are covered in various competitions is not a relevant argument for deletion. U-21 results listings do exist; see: England national under-21 football team results, but are admittedly not widespread, though I am not aware of previous consensus that they are not notable. Fenix down (talk) 15:28, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - As the person who originally PRODded this article, I have to agree it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. The results of age group teams, even the top age group, aren't necessary here, and I would consider it worth nominating for deletion the list of England U21 results mentioned above. – PeeJay 16:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 18:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep (possible merge) - per Fenix down's rational as stated in that user's !vote: the amount of coverage might make this article reliable or at the very least suitable information to be part of the larger team article. Inter&anthro (talk) 00:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Fenix. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:07, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge, I don't feel this merits its own article but if adequately sourced it could have a place in the main U21 article. It looks like someone is interested in updating it, but if this tails off it should maybe all be deleted (if we get to say 2020 and there are detailed results from 5 years earlier but nothing current, it ends up looking silly). Crowsus (talk) 10:44, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, agree with Fenix. --Pelmeen10 (talk) 17:45, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 09:47, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.