The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 15:34, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cityflyer Routes A21 and NA21[edit]

Cityflyer Routes A21 and NA21 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, non notable bus route(s). Almost entirely written as a travel guide Ajf773 (talk) 09:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• delete- what need this page when we have Cityflyer_Route_A21 (also under Afd). As per reasoning there, fails notability, plus not guide. what fares Quek157 (talk) 10:04, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Even Cityflyer Route A21 doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline. Ajf773 (talk) 10:06, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I concur Quek157 (talk) 10:07, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And it's been nominated too. Ajf773 (talk) 10:10, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:NOTGUIDE Acnetj (talk) 05:43, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.