The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 06:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Gandgarh[edit]

Battle of Gandgarh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The battle is not historically accurate and the sources are unreliable and relies heavily on WP:Raj sources. The page requires deletion.

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 7. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, Afghanistan, and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Poor page with very unreliable sources from WP:RAJ written by British administrators and some others fail verification and WP:HISTRS. RangersRus (talk) 15:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Refs consists of a large corpus, with some historians. Article is decently written and has potential for improvement. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 17:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sikhism-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Poorly written article most of the Sources fall under WP:RAJ and it even fails WP:HSTRS the article should be deleted.
• Delete. Sources are without a doubt unreliable as stated by WP:RAJ UnbiasedSN (talk) 00:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as there's no significant coverage and notability in new and RS sources. Based Kashmiri (talk) 09:28, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.