The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Passes the subject specific guideline. Historic consensus indicates there is unlikely to be opposing arguments for delete that will carry sufficient weight to be successful. Fenix down (talk) 10:22, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aurélio Buta[edit]

Aurélio Buta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This footballer fails WP:GNG and has not played in a fully pro league Fbgpwns5277 (talk) 01:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - has made a number of appearances in the LigaPro (as already verified in the article), which is a fully-professional league. He therefore meets WP:NFOOTBALL. Needs improving to meet WP:GNG, but he's notable. GiantSnowman 10:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Same reason as stated above. SLBedit (talk) 18:25, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - LigaPro is a fully professional league which meets the notability criteria to pass WP:NFOOTY. Kosack (talk) 18:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.