The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amma Makkal Munnetra Kazhagam[edit]

Amma Makkal Munnetra Kazhagam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amma Makkal Munnetra Kazhagam, which concluded that the founding of a political party is not in itself notable until the party has coverage for contesting elections. The sources in this page are dated March, from the founding of the party, and so are no improvement from when the previous article was deleted. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I Know the article was deleted but when i saw the Article for a similar reginol political party Makkal Needhi Maiam never faced the threat of deletion, I decided to create this one again. Tamilnadu politics is dominated by DMK and AIADMK for decades, but after the demise of both AIADMK and DMK chiefs this year, the state politics has suddenly changed and nobody knows future direction. both these new political parties are going to play a very important role in upcoming General Elections and 2021 state elections and with by-poll win founder dhinakaran has displayed some support for this outfit. If this article is deleted again, it will have to be recreated again because party actually has the potential to garner some votes in the currently open political field of TN Politics... thanks --Adamstraw99 (talk) 05:40, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adamstraw99, see WP:CRYSTAL and WP:OSE.Best, ∯WBG^converse 08:33, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:58, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:58, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete we can recreate it again if/when it becomes notable. SportingFlyer talk 06:18, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non notable political party with coverage only due to its founder. Fails WP:NOTINHERITED. Arguments related to WP:FUTURE should be avoided. See a recent Afd Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Awaaz-e-Punjab that also ended up delete, for the same reasons. --DBigXrayᗙ 20:42, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.