The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:55, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AS FC Urziceni[edit]

AS FC Urziceni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a football club that fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:10, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:10, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no evidence of notability - has not played at a high enough level and has not received significant coverage. GiantSnowman 17:22, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails club level requirements of WP:FOOTYN and I can't find any other evidence of notability. TheCrazedBeast (talk) 21:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Don't Liga V teams play in the Preliminary Rounds of the Cupa României? Nfitz (talk) 00:53, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Maybe, but this club didn't exist yet when the last round of preliminaries were played. Not that playing in them would have confer notability since they're not part of the competition proper. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:24, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:58, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - perhaps a case of WP:TOOSOON; currently, I agree with the users that have stated a GNG and FOOTYN failure Spiderone 10:29, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.