Hello, W656411! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 14:05, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 14:17, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. Wikipedia topics related to hiding have become more opinion based rather than fact based. Wikipedia needs to prevent this from happening W656411 (talk) 23:37, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you mean by "hiding", but your edits to Black Lives Matter were unsourced, your opinions, and reverted as contentious. You need to use the talk page of articles before adding such edits if you don't want to be banned from the topic area. And we depend heavily on interpretations by reliable sources. Doug Weller talk 13:09, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aunt Jemima. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

The lead summary material is well-supported in fully-sourced sections. In particular, you removed:

The Aunt Jemima character is based on the enslaved "Mammy" archetype. Since its debut, the character has been criticized as an example of exploited African American women. "Aunt Jemima" is sometimes used as a female version of the derogatory epithet "Uncle Tom" or "Rastus".

--William Allen Simpson (talk) 21:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Indigenous Peoples' Day. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aunt Jemima, you may be blocked from editing.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  TonyBallioni (talk) 06:08, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

None of the edits made were disruptive. The removed polarization and politicization of controversial topics. The person that should be banned is the person who keeps undoing the edits. Please review. Thanks W656411 (talk) 07:18, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You were edit-warring to insert your opinions into long-established articles and remove sourced content because you disagreed with it. That is disruptive. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:14, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You twice vandalized Aunt Jemima this month, and you had been previously warned about vandalism on that article.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 16:24, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is incorrect. I edited pages to remove the author’s subjective opinions. Wikipedia deals with facts and subjective information. These authors inserts their own, very warped viewpoints into neutral topics. The edits were to in-politicize their subjective and false, misleading information. These edits should be reverted. W656411 (talk) 05:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]