.....

Regarding your attempt to add a picture to Licio Gelli's biography, the problem is that the free license that the picture has been uploaded under on the Italian Wikipedia is not compatible with Wikimedia Commons or the English Wikipedia, therefore it cannot be used on either. If Gelli were deceased, it might be possible to upload the picture as a non-free file but, since he is alive, we cannot use non-free depictions of him on the page. Therefore, in order to add a picture to his biography, you will need to find a free picture. I don't know how much I can help you with that, but a good place to start might be this essay on acquiring free images and Wikipedia's policies on non-free files. Canadian Paul 22:41, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James E. Sabow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James E. Sabow (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 21:39, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Minor Calvo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:56, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Connell Clarke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Connell Clarke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MelanieN (talk) 15:02, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of bare urls why not use the proper tools for references: Wikipedia:Bare URLs. I am not on Wikipedia to clean up your mess. - DonCalo (talk) 18:21, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the article to the correct name as stated in your delete summary. I also restored the content. Next time, you can move it too. If you need help on how to move an article, please read: Wikipedia:How to move a page. Thanks. Hairrr (talk) 18:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hairrr (talk) 18:04, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Correo OCA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cordoba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have removed the list of patents from this article for the following reasons:

• It fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE. We should not include long lists of patents that company holds simply to have lists of patents that a company holds. If you want to say that the company has a lot of patents, you could probably find a source for that statement and make it in a sentence or two.
• It fails WP:Notability. The fact that a patent exists is not notable. The fact that a company owns a patent is not notable either without context, which was not provided in the list.
• There is no obvious encyclopedic reason for its inclusion in the article. If you were simply trying to list the patents that the company owns, that is not encyclopedic information. If you were trying to show that the company has a lot of patents, then you've created an original synthesis, which is not what Wikipedia is for.
• It's ugly and makes the article a lot less readable.

Whether or not you agree with my assessment, I ask that you leave the article as it stands until this difference can be worked out on the talk page. Thank you. --Aurochs (Talk | Block) 05:36, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swiftgate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Fe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scandal over Argentinian arms sales to Ecuador and Croatia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Rioja (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Exxel Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:34, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Russell Welch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell Welch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.. —BarrelProof (talk) 05:10, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of WikiProject Cannabis, you are invited to help organize the project's upcoming "420" collaboration, which is scheduled for April 2017. Yes, we're a few months away, but we're hoping to get the ball rolling by getting buy-in from experienced Wikipedia editors and seek help fleshing out some goals and ideas for a successful campaign. We also plan to conduct both on-wiki and offlline outreach so non-Wikipedias can also contribute. If you are interested in participating, please sign up and contribute to the ongoing discussions. All editors are welcome! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:55, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Arjan Roskam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 14:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]