Please refrain from adding incorrect Dutch declension system to mislead other users. Thank you. matt-(my page-leave me a message) 13:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically, if you disagree with the content at Dutch declension, please discuss the changes you think ought to be made at Talk:Dutch declension. Do not just start a new page with a misleadingly similar name. —Angr 14:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Archaic Dutch Declension (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 18:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very funny ?!?

Some idiot called by user:Future Perfect at Sunrise blocked me! I'm not a sock of user:Bombshell or user:Govert Miereveld!

Scavenger 17:49, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just beautiful, if I want to be unblocked, it's up to user:Future Perfect at Sunrise, who blocked me in the first place for having an other opinion?!? I think I'll just get another account.

Scavenger 20:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes? Then pray explain this coincidence in editing times. Are you three sharing a computer and taking turns? Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore I sometimes do edits at the VUB (University at Brussels), from which I am a student, so it's possible someone else uses the same computer, is that a problem?

Scavenger 21:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• 4 April
  • 19:52-19:56 Bombshell
  • 19:14-19:39 Scavenger
  • 18:13-19:10 Govert Miereveld

• 27 March
  • 17:59-18:07 Bombshell
  • 15:48-17:47 Govert Miereveld

• 26 March
  • 17:12-18:25 Bombshell
  • 16:05-17:09 Govert Miereveld

• 21 March
  • 18:24-19:38 Govert Miereveld
  • 18:16-18:19 Scavenger

• 14 March
  • 18:48-18:56 Bombshell
  • 17:34-17:43 Scavenger
  • 17:30 Bombshell

I don't see the problem? Some user logged in just before or just after me? Is that a crime? And what does "pray explain" mean?

Scavenger 18:10, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want this block reviewed by another admin, use the {unblock} template. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update:

• 11 March
  • 21:36-21:37 User:IamScavenger
  • 21:30-21:34 Bombshell

Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:59, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scavenger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think this is just an easy way to end discussion at Dutch Declension System

Decline reason:

I disagree, seems a perfectly reasonable conclusion by the blocking admin, not helped by your personal attacks and threatening to just use more accounts above. --pgk 07:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think this is just an easy way to end discussion at Dutch Declension System Scavenger 21:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I brought that case to the admins and Fut.Perf. has a fair reason to believe and thus the block. It is by no means a case of ending discussion of the whole Dutch declension system at all. (Even if you're of different persons I'm sure Bombshell/Govert are still on your side of the discussion. Ending means blocking of all those usernames as well.) And what a coincidence as well other usernames log in/out with your username in such a short while, in the same university. Fut.Perf didn't even explicitly mention the using of the same computer. Too much coincidence isn't it? matt-(my page-leave me a message) 13:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The blocking admin was taking part in the discussion, and by blocking two of three counterparties I think he is trying to end the discussion, simple as that. The discussion was such a shame that Govert said he will stop attributing to wikipedia, (this was later removed by Rex Germanus (and this should stay removed because it contains personal attacks). Furthermore I think it is correct that Govert is blocked due to these attacks, but I don't see any reason to block me?

Scavenger 20:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I for sure wont miss someone who insulted me, nor do wiki needs someone like that. Funny though he/she can still use his/her other account, Bombshell. matt-(my page-leave me a message) 11:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For the hundred time: I'm not Bombshell nor Govert!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Scavenger 16:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You will still need to come up with a good explanation why you always alternate your edits with Bombshell with an interval of 5 minutes. He starts editing exactly five minutes after you stop, or vice versa. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:06, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No I won't

IamScavenger 21:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]