This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --Launebee (talk) 16:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't participated in this discussion yet. FYI, it is still ongoing. Stop by if you want to help us reach consensus. SalimJah (talk) 09:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MePhisto. Just wanted to share a little tip. Whenever your reactto the post of somebody else, it is customary to indent your response by typing ':' in front of your response (as I've done above, actually). Only a custom, but the habit greatly increases the readability of our discussions. :) SalimJah (talk) 17:22, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

Hello,

I have spotted an other user that could be added to the sockpuppet investigation. It ticks a lot of boxes :

• All edits are about the University of Paris II Assas
• It lies about what the references in French actually say[1]
• "top university in France" style of writting[2]
• "Heir of the faculty of law" style of writting[3].

Shall I proceed and add it to the CU ? XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 10:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello XIIIfromTOKYO,

Thank you for your research. To my mind the account unmistakably fits with the content and language style of Launabee. Please do add it to the CU. At this point I feel that there's no deterrent that will stop Launabee from making new attempts with new sockpuppet-accounts. However, giving up also can't be the answer.

MePhisto (talk) 11:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]