Hello

Has instructions on what kind of sourcing we are looking for. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jamplevia (talk) 13:12, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Special:Contributions/DagnyDominique
• Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
• Wikipedia:Reliable sources
• User:GreenC/WaybackMedic 2.5
• User:Citation bot/use
• Wikipedia:Twinkle
• User:Frietjes/findargdups
• WikiPedia Library
• Accessibility dos and don'ts
• Template:PLANTS

Born September 22, 1946. Latest album (CD) released 2014. Record label website went off the air in 2021.

Interviews

• December 28, 1999 AmbiEntrance interview with Larry Kucharz
• Armchair DJ interview with Larry Kucharz

NYT

• Arts and Leisure Guide - The New York Times 1977
• The Music of Lawrence Kucharz - The New York Times 1979
• Critics' Choice: Music - The New York Times 1985
• Intermedia Works - The New York Times 1987
• New-Music Festival Celebrating 10 Years -The New York Times 1989

Finding aids

• MOMA PS1 Sound '79 Sunday Performance Series: Lawrence Kucharz November 4, 1979
• Carnegie Museum of Art - Artist file for Larry Kucharz (1985-1986)
• Online Archive of California - Institute for Dance and Experimental Art Records

Reviews

• Review of Larry Kucharz - "DigiChoral Blue Portraits" Morton Feldman
• Reviews of Larry Kucharz' works
• Brief reviews of Larry Kucharz' works 2003 Piero Scaruffi
• Brief review of Larry Kucharz - "Ambient Red Washes"
• Reviews of Larry Kucharz' works

Performance

• The Pentaphonic Winds premiered his Woodwind Quintet 1975 #18
• Artists presented by Experimental Intermedia NY from 1973 to 2007 - Curated by Phill Niblock

Radio

• Larry Kucharz – DigiChoral Blue Portraits (1999) on WMUC (2004) WMUC-FM

Business websites

• International Audiochrome business page on AOL
• HYPNOS associated artists: Larry Kucharz
• International Audiochrome, Inc. catalog of CD’s by Larry Kucharz

Books

• Text-Sound Texts, Edited by Richard Kostelanetz, New York, NY: William Morrow and Company, Inc., 1980 ISBN 0688036163 Claims Lawrence Kucharz was born in 1936 in Chicago. Contains "City Scenes II" 1978 by Kurchaz. States that essays by Kucharz are in Ear Magazine.
• Subversive Expectations - Performance Art and Paratheater in New York, 1976-85, By Sally Banes, 1998 ISBN 9780472066780 Contains an article from SoHo Weekly News August 24, 1979. Describes Canal St. performance including Kucharz' "City Street Scenes I" poem.
• Extracts from an interview with Henri Chopin by Lawrence Kucharz, Larry Wendt and Ellen Zweig at the Eleventh International Sound Poetry Festival in Toronto… October 20, 1978. Edited and transcribed by Lawrence Kucharz and Larry Wendt. Ear magazine. Volume 5, Issue 2, Summer 1979

Interviews

• An Interview with Style Icon Isla Van Damme

Photo Shoots

• See how designer Isla Maria ‘Loulou’ Van Damme became a muse for AD’s Red Issue

Category:CS1_maint:_url-status

• oops
• whoops

History of the Chicken Tractor[edit]

There is already this article: Chicken tractor but it lacks any historical background. (talk) 12:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

POV: I first became aware of chicken tractors via online sources circa 2006. I witnessed my first operational deployment of chick tractors in 2020. Now I see Stock Cropper developing their ClusterCluck product line in 2022.

Clues[edit]

In order to know where to do research I need to find clues first.

• Chicken tractor cites Andrew W. Lee's book as being from 2006 but Google books shows it was originally published in 1994. Worldcat has OCLC 777312292 ISBN 9780962464829 ISBN 9780962464867 ISBN 0962464821 ISBN 0962464864. 1994 might be the year that chicken tractors originated, or at least the oldest year of publication.
• Endland in the late 1800s using wattle hurdles to move chickens around or weaving basket runs. the more wealthy people used wire fencing
• Henry Stephens Book of the Farm

The Book of the Farm, Volume 1, Henry Stephens Originally published: 1842, 1889 edition

Doesn't mention chicken. Search for

• poultry
• fowl
• fowls
• broods
• brooders
• eggs

instead.

Doesn't mention wattle but it does include hurdle for enclosing sheep on turnips. N.b. it's very encouraging to me to see such a design, there may be chicken tractors here.

The Book of the Farm, Volume 2, Henry Stephens Originally published: 1842, 1847 edition

How medical research makes it into medical practice?[edit]

POV: I've observed that some ideas that are supported by large amounts of medical research for hundreds of years appear to have very limited influence on medical practice. This includes a research paper directly requesting (petitioning?) that a medical textbook be updated with information based on the medical research.

How does medical research makes it into medical practice? Is there a formal process? (talk) 12:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Terminology and phrasing[edit]

• Translating Medical Research Into Medical Practice
• Translational Biomedical Sciences

Thank you so much for this link i love u

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moby_Project&diff=prev&oldid=1087041777 Oriolgalceran (talk) 20:26, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are most welcome. I'm glad to have helped you by providing you with a link to a working download site for the Moby project. Jamplevia (talk) 17:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Blue Edits. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to Talk:Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. Blue Edits (talk) 07:23, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was talking about myself. ... Jamplevia (talk) 14:16, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why is my disease obscene? Jamplevia (talk) 00:35, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's harassment policy, as you did at User talk:Woodensuperman, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users potentially compromises that safe environment. --woodensuperman 16:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that my disability is causing issues, but I do have a real question: why is popular culture considered to be trivia. ---- Jamplevia (talk) 17:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• re Cocteau, the best guidance for popular culture is not whether the subject of the article is important to the popular culture referenced, but whether that culture is important to the subject of the article. So does the film have any significance to Cocteau? Or to our contemporary perception of Cocteau?

For this instance, I'm not seeing it. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! Now I get it. Thanks! ---- Jamplevia (talk) 11:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Andy Dingley is it true the other way around? If modern culture references the old culture is it ok to mention it in an article. I put a reference to Cocteau in Liquid Sky. ---- Jamplevia (talk) 11:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's already mentioned at Liquid Sky, but it still seems trivial, and the plot summary seems a bit long. --woodensuperman 11:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't know the film, but the mention there seems about right. I don't think the plot summary is problematically long, although it's certainly long and longer than we would usually favour.

I wouldn't add Cocteau in an IPC section. This is just (yet another) early '80s passing reference to Cocteau in a film (and it's mentioned). Those years were full of them, Cocteau was fashionable, despite few people actually reading him or watching his films. IPC is more for when a more knowing, yet less obvious, reference is made. So as the apparent inverse of what I wrote, The Seventh Seal has an IPC section which mentions Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey. Bill & Ted mentions The Seventh Seal directly (not IPC), as a major plot device that they borrow. Seal places the reciprocal mention in an IPC section. Although Bill & Ted (whilst most excellent) obviously had no influence on a film 30 years earlier, it does demonstrate (as is our core need) that the older film is still important and relevant to popular culture much later on, and that these later references are influencing the modern perception of the original film. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe how much you are helping me learn the rules! You help is so very invaluable to me. Jamplevia (talk) 00:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]