You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tan ǀ 39 17:18, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gerri365 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think this block is unfair that only happened once and I'd like to request a block review.

Decline reason:

I've reviewed your edits, including this edit, and concur with the block. Incorrectly posting about the death of a living person is unacceptable here. I defer to Tan with regard to the allegations of sockpuppetry, but such allegations, if proven, would likely support the indefinite duration of this block. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 17:29, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I want this block reviewed by another admin I have heard this similar thing happened before and I want it reviewed by another Admin.--Gerri365 (talk) 17:32, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is certainly your perogative. I would recommend also that you review our guide to appealing blocks and consider your reasons behind posting this edit. Since that's the conduct that resulted in your block, I would think that you'll need to explain why you posted that before another admin would consider an unblock. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 17:37, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet. Happening too fast for me to post templates yet; see my talk page for details. Tan ǀ 39 17:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what the hell you're talking about today is the first time I have been on Wikipedia and Iam not a Sock all I ask is to be unblocked--Gerri365 (talk) 17:24, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Way4743 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Tan ǀ 39 17:34, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a sock and I have nothing to do with this user Undrwood9098 so shame on you people.--Gerri365 (talk) 17:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing them Iam done with you bastards I do not know the password to the Undrwod9098 account so you should be ashamed of yourselves.--Gerri365 (talk) 17:39, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]