Gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay means happy 😊 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.185.53.84 (talk) 00:27, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@31.185.53.84: Hello. :) Clr324 (say hi) 11:52, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Clr324, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Cameron11598 (Converse) 08:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you changed "lysine acetylsalicylate" into "lysine aspirinate".[1] The former is WP:COMMONNAME, the later even does not appear in Google. I have reverted. Regards, kashmiri ^TALK 18:23, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was going by copper aspirinate as a pattern. Clr324 23:20, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

An 'original research' oops. <wink> (I've caught myself extrapolating/speculating a few times as well.) :  }--Kevjonesin (talk) 07:20, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody's perfect. Clr324 (say hi) 17:26, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At the top of the ref it says "Class: Opiate Agonists" http://www.drugs.com/monograph/tramadol-hydrochloride.html Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The term "opiate" refers to alkaloids of the opium poppy according to opiate. Is tramadol found in the opium poppy? It could very well be. Clr324 00:02, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

I'm stupid, tramadol is 100% synthetic. Ms. Andrea Carter here (at your service) 06:27, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your thank you! It is nice to know what I am writing is being read. And I like your 3 reasons to edit: I am always thinking about what to write that a high school student in general biology - not advanced placement - can understand and use. And yes I too learn tons when I edit, and it IS fun!

I got a message that I had been thanked, and found on my user page it was you. Do you know if there is there a place to look to see which edit a person has thanked me for - in this case, you?

Regards, IiKkEe (talk) 17:22, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're so welcome :D Yes I did thank you. Clr324 20:20, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

@IiKkEe: See Wikipedia:Notifications/Thanks. --Kevjonesin (talk) 07:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Editor's Barnstar
		You've made fixes to previously unnoticed problematic text and other useful edits in articles which have been subjected to a stupid amount of editorial review and which I've worked on extensively. This is my way of saying thanks for helping out. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢ | Maintained) 06:08, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] PS: naming these things "barnstars" still seems completely random to me.

Wow. I was just bored. Thank you so very much :D Can I put it on my Wikipedia page? --Clr324 06:20, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Sure, hehe. A lot of editors display barnstars on their userpage. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢ | Maintained) 06:31, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then :) --Clr324 06:33, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi thanks for fixing the background on my 3d model of MDMA. Is there an easy way for me to do this to the rest that I've uploaded?

Lazord00d (talk) 03:00, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks!! With the background matching it looks much better.. Lazord00d (talk) 03:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! Converting them now.. appreciate the help!

Lazord00d (talk) 04:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do sign my edits with ~~~~. For some reason it doesn't seem to work. :( Clr324 05:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Click this link - Special:Preferences - and then scroll down to the signature heading. Add "[[User:Clr324|Clr324]] ([[User talk:Clr324|talk]])" (without quotes) to the field to the right of "Signature:". Once you do that, make sure the box below it has a check mark (i.e., the box followed by "Treat the above as wiki markup. ...").

After you do those 2 things, hit save at the bottom of the page and then try using the 4 tildes again. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢ | Maintained) 04:43, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it anyways by getting a new sig. Clr324 (say hi) 08:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sertindole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syncope. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit you made, see the WP:NOTBROKEN guideline. Flyer22 (talk) 01:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have a burden for this subject, so would you please go to every Cannabis article and do this, because right now your idea is only applied occasionally and very inconsistently. You may be right, but it's not being applied. -- BullRangifer (talk) 15:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@BullRangifer: The spelling Cannabis isn't always applicable. If you're talking about the genus you spell it Cannabis but if you are talking about Cannabis used as a psychoactive or medication you spell it cannabis. For example, hemp is Cannabis but it isn't cannabis.

Since Charlotte's Web intended to be used a medication you could spell it cannabis or Cannabis but it makes no sense to call it cannabis. Clr324 (say hi) 15:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I understand your point, and I wasn't thinking strictly along those lines when I wrote the article. My concern now is about the way the word is capitalized (or not) in many other articles. I had assumed that they were okay (especially the mother article), and I just followed their example, but according to you they weren't good examples. Please get to work on them, because they don't follow your ideas very often. We need some consistency here. I wish you well in your endeavor. -- BullRangifer (talk) 02:20, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@BullRangifer: Thanks! Clr324 (say hi) 14:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hi, haw are u?? I'm a Deaf sicilian.. do u are is Deaf?? --SURDUSVII 12:05, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SurdusVII: I'm fine, thanks for asking. :D I'm not Deaf. I'm an hearing American. Ms. Andrea Carter here (at your service) 17:39, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hi, I realized.. ^_^ --SURDUSVII 07:36, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SurdusVII: Hello! Andrea Carter (at your service | my evil deads) 07:38, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Clr324, so when you moved your draft from userspace to draftspace, you did a cut-and-paste move which is almost always the wrong way to move articles because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. I tagged the article and talk page so that an administrator can fix the problem with a history merge. Wugapodes (talk) 01:02, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wugapodes: I didn't know. :( Ms. Andrea Carter here (at your service) 01:04, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a problem, don't worry. I didn't know about it the first time I had to move a page either, this was more so that you can do it correctly in the future. Plus, the move button is way easier than cut and paste moves so it's good to know about. Wugapodes (talk) 00:36, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wugapodes: The worst part is I've moved pages before but I just forgot. I have no excuse. :( Ms. Andrea Carter here (at your service) 12:45, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Deaf culture movement —has been proposed for merging with Deaf culture. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Wugapodes (talk) 21:13, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wugapodes: They should've just kept in draft stage and once it was ready ask for it be created. Ms. Andrea Carter here (at your service) 21:20, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but might as well keep going forward. I'd recommend commenting on the discussion about your thoughts on the matter; I commented that I think the title makes the intent of the page confusing. I looked through the history and noticed that SurdusVII moved it out of draft space. I'm going to notify him/her of the discussion as well. Wugapodes (talk) 23:12, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In an article about a British organisation, please don't change the terminology to American (the article is marked with {{Use British English}}). The name of the organisation itself is a clue to the UK terminology. I've reverted your change. PamD 21:12, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD: Okay. Ms. Andrea Carter here (at your service | my evil deads) 00:16, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I misclicked and rollbacked an edit of yours; sorry. You did nothing wrong there. DS (talk) 13:14, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DragonflySixtyseven: It happens to all of us. :) Andrea Carter (at your service | my evil deads) 17:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the ref here [2] with a newer article that is a review. We should try to use reviews per WP:MEDRS. Also WP:MEDHOW has some cool tricks for formatting refs. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:50, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James: Thank you. :) Andrea Carter (at your service | my evil deads) 07:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature, don't you mean deeds? Or is that deliberate?--Launchballer 00:29, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Launchballer: It is a typo. Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 01:12, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking it was a reference to Evil Dead :P Mechordeus (talk) 06:01, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've never seen or heard of about that movie until now. :P Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 06:34, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Just a heads up that I reverted an edit under your name on the Digit Ratio article. I might have misunderstood the reason for the removal. Have a great day! Mechordeus (talk) 06:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mechordeus: I simplified it to autism because Asperger's is considered to be an autism spectrum "disorder." It would sort of be like say "homosexuality spectrum and lesbianism." Except the difference between Asperger's, PDD-NOS and classical is a lot more arbitrary. Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 06:33, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know I have a userbox that says "This user has Asperger syndrome and doesn't think of it as a disease in need of curing." and I categorize myself as Category:Wikipedians with Asperger syndrome, it is for archival purposes. Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 06:36, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see the parallel now, thank you for clarifying :) I'm still iffy on removing the reference to AS, since the source does sub-divide the studied group into autism and autism-AS. How about shifting AS to the fore, since it's a smaller/particular part of the whole? Such as "Increased rate of Asperger syndrome and autism (when comparing digit ratio to general population)" or "Increased rate of Asperger syndrome and other autism disorders (when comparing digit ratio to population)"? Mechordeus (talk) 17:14, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mechordeus: That would be okay. Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 18:06, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic! Edited the article per the above. Thank you very much for your help, and happy editing! Mechordeus (talk) 19:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mechordeus: You too. :) Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 23:23, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Many thanks for your work simplifying medical articles. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:41, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James: Thanks! Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 15:27, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for that - I will try to pop back in later and discuss it properly. Cheers DBaK (talk) 10:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered: You're welcome. :) Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 10:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Neuroqueer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CombatWombat42 (talk) 00:12, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't invent the term and I don't personally know the person who did. Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 01:42, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Clr324. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Neuroqueer, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@CoffeeWithMarkets: I don't really care anymore. Delete it if you want but if I find it referenced in notable sources, I will recreate it as a separate article. Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 07:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is that the term is basically made up out of whole cloth. It doesn't matter what I think of it personally or anybody else's feelings. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:08, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@CoffeeWithMarkets: I don't understand that metaphor. Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 07:11, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The term "Neuroqueer" has even less meaning than the likes "Speckledorf" or "Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious", because while those two came out of nowhere basically, they are least have been used notably in popular contexts that could be reported on by reliable sources. "Neuroqueer" doesn't even have that. You might as well take any two other random terms with some political significance, say "guns" and "GMOs", and invent "GunMOs" as a term that describes something... let's say that some faction somewhere in the U.S. (on Facebook, Tumblr, Vine, etc) thinks that consuming genetically modified foods makes a person more likely to commit gun crimes. There we are. Just now, I've done the exact same thing that happened with "Neuroqueer". It's not the same thing as notability, not in the slightest. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@CoffeeWithMarkets: If gunMOs got media attention, it would make sense to have an article on it. For one, I didn't make the term NeuroQueer, stop attributing it to me (sorry if you aren't, it seems like you are). The only connection I have to the term is I'm part of the Facebook group and I created the redirect.

Second, the term is the intersection of Queer theory and the neurodiversity movement. Think the identity is a mix of two different things? Great but that doesn't change that if it had nobility I would create the article. I personally don't think the identity is random, both Queer and Neurodivergent are pathologized, told incorrectly we have an illness to be treated. Also the social barriers that certain people face, called disability, can impair ability to engage in prescribed gender roles.

But it isn't notable right now so you have a point there. Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 07:35, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in the following. Talk:Free bleeding is being deleted due to it being a talk page without a corresponding article. I'm going to put it here, if that's alright with you.

--Launchballer 09:00, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Clr324, I left a note for you on the Mental Health talk page. Not sure if you have the time for some discussion but wanted to invite you and look forward to a dialog about this important topic. --Cityside189 (let's talk! - contribs) 22:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Neuroqueer. Since you had some involvement with the Neuroqueer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. CombatWombat42 (talk) 13:54, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@CombatWombat42: I don't want to participate in that discussion. I just don't care anymore. Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 16:31, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but Adam Lanza did have behavioral problems and they were called such in various media accounts of the shooting. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 23:10, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bookworm857158367: I'm not denying he was Autistic and obsessive-compulsive. It is biased to call them behavioral problems though. OCD is mostly a problem but some obsessive-compulsives find positives. Autism isn't a problem in any way. His behavioral problem was murder-suicide, not neurodivergence. Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 23:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Exactly. Media accounts of the shooting may well have said that he had behavioural problems, but that doesn't mean that we can do a slightly OR-ish thing of sticking it in as a heading and listing autism or whatever. This is contentious to say the least. Autism isn't a behavioural problem. As Andrea says, it's more of a wiring issue. I oppose the reinstatement of "problems". Best wishes to all DBaK (talk) 23:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's a matter of opinion. They were referred to as behavioral problems in the news coverage that I saw and were certainly regarded as such by the people who knew him. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 23:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bookworm857158367: It is a matter of opinion, you're right. I am 100% biased because I am Autistic and obsessive-compulsive and support the neurodiversity movement. I never hid that. The point is there is a disagreement (and behavioral problem is not a medical term) and thus a neutral term would be acceptable to everyone. Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 00:02, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. The current situation is more neutral and does not require citation to support the wording. Other approaches might. DBaK (talk) 11:32, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are being contacted because you contributed to a recent discussion of MOS:IDENTITY that closed with the recommendation that Wikipedia's policy on transgender individuals be revisited.

Two threads have been opened at the Village Pump:Policy. The first addresses how the Manual of Style should instruct editors to refer to transgender people in articles about themselves (which name, which pronoun, etc.). The second addresses how to instruct editors to refer to transgender people when they are mentioned in passing in other articles. Your participation is welcome. Darkfrog24 (talk) 02:44, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Darkfrog24: Thank you for mentioning. I don't know if I will participate but I do care and give my support in spirit to anybody who says Transgender people should have their identity respected. Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 02:48, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which discussions you participate in is entirely up to you. You have as much right to silence (or to a break) as to speak. My job is just to tell you that the discussion is open. Thanks for your thoughtfulness. Darkfrog24 (talk) 02:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Andrea Carter (at your service | my good deeds) 04:52, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Surdophobia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surdophobia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mathglot (talk) 06:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?

1. Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
2. Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
3. Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:52, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLGBT is on Twitter!

Hello Clr324! Follow the Wikimedia LGBT user group on Twitter at @wikilgbt for news, photos, and other topics of interest to LGBT Wikipedans and allies. Use #wikiLGBT to share any Wiki Loves Pride stuff that you would like to share (whether this month or any day of the year) or to alert folks to things that the LGBT Wikipedan community should know. RachelWex (talk) For more information about Wiki Loves Pride, → click here ←.

I noticed you did some work on Hearing (person). I'm just letting you know that I have proposed this article for deletion.CircleGirl (talk) 21:40, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you were not notified that the article is at AfD a second time. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:26, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Autism $peaks. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 24#Autism $peaks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm (talk) 19:51, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:38, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:Pangender Wikipedians has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Deaf ethnicity and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 4 § Deaf ethnicity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. An anonymous username, not my real name 21:34, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]