An article you recently created, Twisty the Clown 2 and Fred, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:43, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cam Bout -- I've declined the deletion request on Guest Slave but it is not suitable for mainspace yet, so I have moved it to draft for you to continue working on it. You can find it at Draft:Guest Slave. Generally shortlived characters in television series are not considered to need a separate article, so it might be best to try to find a relevant existing article and add the information there, together with a reliable source. Note that IMDb is not usually considered sufficiently reliable enough to use. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 01:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cam Bout,

I wanted to recommend to you that you create and develop articles in Draft space or User space like your Sandbox. Articles that are put directly into the main space of the project are subject to review and if they are incomplete or unsourced, they are likely to be deleted. Working in Draft space or in your Sandbox allows you some time to get articles into good enough shape to not be deleted when moved into main space. It helps a lot if you submit them to Articles for Creation where an experienced AFC reviewer can give you some help and advice.

If you have questions about article creation, deletion processes or editing on Wikipedia, I encourage you to bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:27, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article Draft:Sascha Malkovich. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 21:46, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As before, do not use take sources, such as "everything.explained.today". If you continue to add these, especially to biographies, this account will be disabled until you respond. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 14:06, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't know if you are Sascha Malkovich or are just romehow connected to him, but it is completely inappropriate to add him to the character lists of every show he may or may not have appeared in. He is not a notable performer by Wikipedia standards, and his roles are not notable enough for cast lists, per our definition. It seems like you are trying to make this person seem more important than they are, and Wikipedia is not a promotional tool for actors. Please stop adding this person to articles without reliable sources of actual coverage, not just mentions of the actor on TVGuide.com. Continuing to do this may negatively affect your editing privileges in the future. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 17:48, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page.

Kuru (talk) 18:12, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]