Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Claw of Slime (talk) 17:24, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the one to be blamed. the edits done by me are not owned by me in any way. I do not own or am related to any of the edited links & mentions. The spammer here is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Abuse_response/213.253.216.248 I have filed a complaint. This user is repeatedly promoting his own content, and deleting other unbiased content. Please help me here, instead of blaming me?

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Even if 213.253.216.248 seems to be spammer, you should not do edit war. --Claw of Slime (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Advanced Encryption Standard. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiptoety ^talk 18:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Animesh.roark (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, Thank you for giving me , your precious time & attention. I do understand the editing rules of wikipedia, and I have an honest intension of keeping a few articles of my expertise (on wikipedia) , updated and unbiased. I never intended to indulge into an edit war, and actually became a victim of the offences by a user at IP 213.253.216.248. This user has been repeatedly spamming & editing a couple of articles , thereby removing legitimate content & replacing it with his own links , just for the intension of promoting his own websites & products. I suppose, that it is highly unethical as well as harmful for the overall unbiased standards of wikipedia. I had warned this user repeatedly, and still he never stopped and continued editing the articles without a single appropriate reason or cause of editing. Without having any refference & commentary regarding the editing by 213.253.216.248 user forced me to unintentionaly hurt the standards & policies of wikipedia, and I am genuinely sorry for that. I assure you that This wouldn't be repeated, and I understand that I should have reported the 213.253.216.248 user as soon as he started being spammy.I just tried to follow the reverting rule of wikipedia which says : "Reverting vandalism is not edit warring." I hope you understand my condition & circumstances & pardon me from being banned, for once. Animesh.roark (talk) 18:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As the blocking admin has noted, you clearly were not reverting vandalism as you say. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:33, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• The problem is, you were not reverting vandalism, you were just edit warring over what spammy external link was being included in the article. I might suggest that you take a read of WP:EXTERNAL. I am happy to unblock you if you agree to abide by Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Tiptoety ^talk 19:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mlpearc. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Burhan Muzaffar Wani, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Mlpearc (open channel) 05:02, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Burhan Wani, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:38, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How’s this disruptive boss? According to wikipedia’s own article on Hizbul Mujahideen, it says : “ The group has been designated as a terrorist group by India,[2] the European Union[3] and the United States,[4][5][6][7][8] active in the state of Jammu and Kashmir since 1989”

That’s what I updated on the man’s page. I just meant to correct it and make things consistent. Was my way of doing it wrong? Or did I make some other mistake? Please enlighten me. Animesh.roark (talk) 21:53, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One, there is a huge difference between "being designated a terrorist by someone" and "being a terrorist". Two, read WP:TERRORIST. — kashmīrī ^TALK 22:15, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So, for you guys he’s a hero, right? Do you consider yourself Indian, if you are actually a kashmiri? Really curious. Animesh.roark (talk) 18:19, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Citing the exact same agency article in different news media does not mean it is a different source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kanhaiya Lal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kanhaiya Lal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:06, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Animesh.roark! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:06, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Animesh.roark. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kanhaiya Lal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Paywush.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 14:49, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Paywush.com, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 14:59, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Zppix were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paywush.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paywush.com, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 18:34, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I would like to point you to Wikipedia:Paid editing and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Please read those and comply with the requirements. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:39, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Animesh.roark. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paywush.com".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 18:35, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]