This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Plants Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Melanthera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20141106174748/http://dixon.iplantcollaborative.org/CompositaeWeb/Default.aspx?Page=AdvNameSearch to http://dixon.iplantcollaborative.org/CompositaeWeb/Default.aspx?Page=AdvNameSearch

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:13, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Black anther and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 29#Black anther until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Plantdrew (talk) 18:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi to anyone reading! I'm suggesting a split as said above. While I was updating the Melanthera biflora article, I found out that not only is that binomial name redirected to Wollastonia biflora (according to Plants Of The World Online and World Flora Online) and therefore no longer in the Melanthera list (POWO, WFO), but that Wollastonia is already updated as its own separate genus (POWO, WFO).

Those two sources have the final say on plant genera. So, I think we need to check which present species has a new binomial name and sort from the Melanthera genus into a separate Wollastonia article (if the two genera mentioned have some overlap like Melanthera biflora) or any other genus that lists them in those new, updated names. I'm afraid I'm not capable of doing this alone, so I'm putting this out there to ask anyone reading to help along. -- Mat Kiyan (talk) 15:28, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]