![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Nice article
[edit]Only needs some grammar clean-up and. Demantos 14:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
I re-wrote the page. Looks better now. Demantos 15:36, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
WPMED assessment
[edit]I think the article is still B class, low importance. If you are looking for editorial advice re how to improve it, you might request peer review. This is not my area, but in general articles like this benefit from a "See also" section and some thoughtful writing about the history and significance of the article. --66.167.135.94 (talk) 20:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
EMT-CC or AEMT-CC
[edit]Just wondering, does anyone know what the officially designation is? I've seen it both ways (EMT-CC AEMT-CC). I don't live in New York, but based on what I saw when I was compiling the EMT Cert Level list, it looked like the EMT-CC was the official name, but that name fell under the "Advanced EMT" group that included intermediates and paramedics.
Thanks,
JPINFV (talk) 03:19, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Official name is AEMT-CC Demantos (talk) 19:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Whether you are a basic emt or a cct emt, you are an emt and the license number you are given is just your emt number, and that is the number that you will keep thru your entire ems career and no matter what level you continue your education to. Say as a basic emt your card number is 123456, you will be emt123456. As an advanced level, you would be aemt123456. So technically both are right, because you are an emt where you are basic or critical care... But aemt is more commonly used to differentiate and make life easier for documentation purposes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.231.161.218 (talk) 00:52, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on AEMT-CC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304055141/http://www.nycremsco.org/gop.asp?intCategoryID=2&intArticleID=411 to http://www.nycremsco.org/gop.asp?intCategoryID=2&intArticleID=411
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:38, 1 October 2016 (UTC)