The powers of the prime minister of the United Kingdom come from several sources of the UK constitution, including both statute and constitutional convention, but not one single authoritative document. They have been described as "...problematic to outline definitively."[1]: p.4
The UK has a fusion of powers, which means that the prime minister exercises functions in both the executive and the legislature. This also means that accountability between the branches is limited, as it is difficult to check on oneself. The prime minister normally (but not necessarily) leads the largest party in the House of Commons and they usually have some power over their own party due to that role.
The status and executive powers of the British prime minister means that the incumbent is consistently ranked as one of the most powerful democratically elected leaders in the world. [2]
Definition of the role and its powers
[edit]Between 2011 and 2014, the Political and Constitutional Reform Select Committee conducted an inquiry into the "role and powers of the Prime Minister". In their report, they wrote:
When Lord Hennessy gave evidence to us, he commented: "the role of the Prime Minister is like the British constitution as a whole—you think you are getting close and it disappears into the mists." With the role itself difficult to define, it is not surprising that the powers of the person who fulfils the role are similarly problematic to outline definitively. Most powers exercised by the Prime Minister are not defined in statute and cannot be found in one place. In his book The Prime Minister: The office and its holders since 1945, Lord Hennessy stated: "Arguments have raged around the powers of the British Prime Minister for nearly 300 years."
Without a clear definition of the role of prime minister, the powers associated with the office have been able to evolve and accumulate, unhindered by statute, over hundreds of years...
There is no single authoritative source for what the role involves and the powers the prime minister can exercise.[1]
Documents describing the role and powers of the PM include:
- From 1947 to 1948, the Cabinet Office prepared a paper titled "Function of the Prime Minister and his Staff".[3]
- In 2002, a private member's bill was drafted to define the "office, role and functions" of the PM,[4] but this was never passed.[5]
- In 2011, the Cabinet Office published The Cabinet Manual,[6] setting out the main laws, rules and conventions affecting the conduct and operation of government, including a description of the role of the PM.
- In 2011, Peter Hennessy gave a list of 47 functions, under eight headings, of the prime minister.[7]
- In 2014, the Political and Constitutional Reform Select Committee produced a final report to their Inquiry, titled Role and powers of the Prime Minister.[1]
Executive powers
[edit]Appointing ministers
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bb/British-war-cabinet-1939-40-churchill-chamberlain.jpg/250px-British-war-cabinet-1939-40-churchill-chamberlain.jpg)
When commissioned by the sovereign, a new prime minister's first requisite is to "form a Government"[8]—to create a cabinet of ministers that has the support of the House of Commons, of which they are expected to be a member. The prime minister nominates all other cabinet members to the sovereign for appointment (who then, if they are not already, names them Privy Counsellors) and ministers, and although consulting senior ministers on their junior ministers, without any Parliamentary or other control or process over these powers. The prime minister decides the ranking order of all ministers.
The prime minister holds powers of patronage which means that at any time, they may obtain the appointment, dismissal or nominal resignation of any other minister. The prime minister may implement a cabinet reshuffle; one famous example was the Night of the Long Knives. The prime minister may resign, either purely personally or with the whole government. A prime minister is no longer just "first among equals" in HM Government; although theoretically the Cabinet might still outvote the prime minister, in practice the prime minister progressively entrenches their position by retaining only personal supporters in the Cabinet. In occasional reshuffles, the prime minister can sideline and simply drop from Cabinet the Members who have fallen out of favour; they remain Privy Counsellors, but the prime minister decides which of them are summoned to meetings.
The Ministerial and other Maternity Allowances Act 2021 provides for the prime minister to grant certain office holders six months' maternity leave at full pay. In the case of ministers, the prime minister may designate that person a 'Minister on Leave', which comes with the salary of that person's previous office for up to six months.[9]
The prime minister is responsible for producing and enforcing the Ministerial Code.
Royal prerogative powers
[edit]The prime minister formally kisses the hands of the sovereign, whose royal prerogative powers are thereafter exercised solely on the advice of the prime minister and His Majesty's Government ("HMG"). The prime minister has weekly audiences with the sovereign, whose rights are constitutionally limited by convention: "to warn, to encourage, and to be consulted";[10] the extent of the sovereign's ability to influence the nature of the prime ministerial advice is unknown, but presumably varies depending upon the personal relationship between the sovereign and the prime minister of the day.
As, by constitutional convention, the monarch acts on ministerial advice in all but exceptional cases, it is effectively ministers who exercise the royal prerogative.[11] And it is, in reality, the prime minister who appoints, accepts the resignations of and dismisses ministers.[12] Rodney Brazier has said:[12]
Of greatest political importance is the Prime Minister's personal authority, which stems from his ability to use, or to advise the Sovereign to use, certain prerogatives. If this country has prime ministerial government, it is based on the Prime Minister's personal authority which, although political in effect, is rooted in the prerogative.
Government policy
[edit]The prime minister sets the Government's policy agenda and priorities,[13] and generally co-ordinates the policies and activities of the Cabinet and Government departments, acting as the main public "face" of His Majesty's Government. The prime minister is ultimately responsible for all policy and decisions.[14]
The prime minister can overrule the policy decisions of individual ministers. Boris Johnson reportedly overruled home secretary Priti Patel on closing UK borders,[15][16] Tony Blair overruled Scottish secretary Donald Dewar on devolving abortion powers to Scotland,[17] Gordon Brown overruled chancellor Alistair Darling on VAT rates,[18][19] and Margaret Thatcher overruled home secretary Leon Brittan on parole for Ian Brady and Myra Hindley.[20]
Some policy decisions are made by the Cabinet. The prime minister chairs the Cabinet, decides its membership, and when and where meetings take place.[6]: p.31–32 Other important policy decisions are made by the Cabinet Committees. The prime minister is free to decide the Cabinet Committees' structure, membership, chairmanship, and terms of reference.[6]: p.32 A number of Cabinet Committees are chaired by the PM.[21]
The prime minister is the minister responsible for national security, and matters affecting MI5, MI6 and GCHQ collectively, though other ministers may authorise individual operations.[6]: p.22 The PM chairs the National Security Council, and appoints the National Security Adviser.
Some Government policy decisions are of such significance that the ultimate decision of how to proceed is made by the prime minister rather than the relevant minister. For example:
- In 1842, prime minister Robert Peel re-introduced income tax.[22][23]
- In 2006–2007, prime minister Tony Blair decided that the UK should renew Trident.[24][25]
- In October 2007, prime minister Gordon Brown approved the construction of Crossrail.[26][27]
- In 2016, David Cameron called an EU referendum.[28][29][30]
- In September 2016, Theresa May authorised the building of Hinkley Point C nuclear power station.[31][32]
- In 2020–2021, Boris Johnson decided that various restrictions and lockdowns should be imposed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.[33][34][35]
The prime minister might have their own policy agenda which they drive to implement. For example:
- Margaret Thatcher drove forward a set of policies now known as Thatcherism.
- Tony Blair led his Government in following a strategy known as the Third Way.[36][37][38]
- David Cameron pushed forward implementation of the Big Society concept.[39][40]
- Theresa May sought to expand the number of grammar school places.[41][42]
Machinery of government
[edit]The prime minister has "almost complete discretion over how to organise government departments".[43] The PM is free to, at any time, create government departments, merge them, rename them, transfer responsibilities between them, and abolish them.[44][45][46]
The civil service
[edit]The prime minister of the day has held the office of Minister for the Civil Service since that office was created in 1968.[6]: p.22 As such the PM has the powers over His Majesty's Civil Service held by that position. These powers may be delegated by the prime minister to others. This power is under review.
Ministers' advisers
[edit]The Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 states that a special adviser to a minister in the UK government can only be appointed if the appointment has been approved by the prime minister.[47]
Similarly, the Ministerial Code says that while Cabinet Ministers and Ministers of State may appoint Parliamentary Private Secretaries, all appointments require the prior written approval of the prime minister.[48]
The Armed Forces
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/UK_Prime_Minister_Visits_Troops_in_Helmand_141003-M-MF313-130.jpg/220px-UK_Prime_Minister_Visits_Troops_in_Helmand_141003-M-MF313-130.jpg)
The Head of the Armed Forces is the monarch.[49] However, Hennessy says that "war is an intensely prime ministerial activity."[50]
The decision to deploy the armed forces overseas rests with the prime minister or the Cabinet, through the exercise of the royal prerogative.[51] Constitutional convention requires that, in the event of a commitment of the armed forces to military action, authorisation is given by the prime minister, on behalf of the Crown.[52] Decisions on military action are taken within the Cabinet with advice.[52] The Defence Council has power of command over members of the armed forces.[53]
However, in 2011, the government of the United Kingdom acknowledged that a constitutional convention had developed whereby the House of Commons should have an opportunity to debate the matter before troops are committed.[6]: p.44 It said that it proposed to observe that convention except when there was an emergency and such action would not be appropriate.[6]: p.44
Similarly, declarations of war by Great Britain and the United Kingdom are through the exercise of the royal prerogative by ministers, and led by the prime minister.[54][55][56]
The prime minister is responsible for the decision to shoot down a hijacked aircraft or an unidentified civil aircraft which responds neither to radio contact nor the signals of RAF interceptor jets, before it reaches a conurbation or a key target on UK territory.[7] The prime minister is also responsible for authorising the use of UK nuclear weapons, including the preparation of four letters of last resort.[7] They also appoint deputies for both of these purposes.[7]
Legislative powers
[edit]Primary legislation
[edit]The prime minister normally has significant power to change the law through passing primary legislation, as the PM is, by definition, able to command a majority in the House of Commons. Therefore, the PM can normally gain House of Commons support for their desired legislation (and House of Commons rejection of any undesirable legislation) - Government defeats in the House of Commons are unusual.
Primary legislation must also be passed by the House of Lords, and while Government defeats in the Lords are more frequent,[57] the power of the Lords to reject a bill passed by the Commons is restricted by conventions and the Parliament Acts. In extremis, as members of the Lords are appointed by the sovereign on the advice of the PM, the PM could appoint, or threaten to appoint, enough peers to the House of Lords who will support the legislation to force the Lords to pass it.[58][59]
The prime minister appoints officials known as the "Government Whips", who negotiate for the support of MPs and to discipline dissenters. Party discipline is strong since electors generally vote for individuals on the basis of their party affiliation. Members of Parliament may be expelled from their party for failing to support the Government on important issues, and although this will not mean they must resign as MPs, it will usually make re-election difficult. Members of Parliament who hold ministerial office or political privileges can expect removal for failing to support the prime minister. Restraints imposed by the Commons grow weaker when the Government's party enjoys a large majority in that House, or among the electorate. In most circumstances, however, the prime minister can secure the Commons' support for almost any bill by internal party negotiations, with little regard to the Opposition MPs.
The domination of Parliament by the government of the day has been called an "Elective dictatorship".
However, even a government with a healthy majority can on occasion find itself unable to pass legislation. For example, on 9 November 2005, Tony Blair's Government was defeated over plans which would have allowed police to detain terror suspects for up to 90 days without charge, and on 31 January 2006, was defeated over certain aspects of proposals to outlaw religious hatred. On other occasions, the Government alters its proposals to avoid defeat in the Commons, as Blair's Government did in February 2006 over education reforms.[60]
Secondary legislation
[edit]Ministers, including the prime minister and other ministers over whom the prime minister has the power of appointment and dismissal, are given the power to create and change certain laws (secondary legislation) by parent Acts of Parliament (primary legislation).[61]
Parliamentary powers
[edit]When Parliament meets
[edit]After a general election, the date of the first meeting of a new Parliament "is determined by a proclamation issued by the Sovereign, on the advice of the Prime Minister."[6]: p.13
Under House of Commons Standing Order 13,[62] the prime minister can ask the speaker to recall Parliament while it is on recess, who then decides.[63][64] For example, in August 2013, David Cameron asked the Speaker to recall Parliament to discuss the Syrian civil war, and the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government.[65]
The power to close Parliament between sessions (prorogation) is a royal prerogative, that is, it belongs to the monarch. However, in practice the monarch exercises this power at the request of the prime minister.[66][67] (Formally it is exercised on the advice of the Privy Council.[68]) Though the prorogation of Parliament by PM Johnson in 2019 was overturned by the Supreme Court,[69] which ruled that his advice to the Queen to prorogue Parliament "was outside the powers of the Prime Minister".[70]
Until the passing of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 (FTPA), the power to dissolve Parliament and call a General Election also belonged to the monarch, in practice exercised when the PM asked the monarch to do so (with a legal maximum of five years between Elections since the Parliament Act 1911, before that a maximum of seven years since the Septennial Act 1716). The FTPA removed this power from both the monarch and the PM,[71][72] giving the circumstances in which a General Election can be held, and states "Parliament cannot otherwise be dissolved".[73] (Though this could be overridden by passing a separate Act, such as the Early Parliamentary General Election Act 2019.) The Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act 2022 repealed the FTPA and restored the prime minister's power to call a general election at a time of their choosing.[74][75]
Formerly, a prime minister whose government lost a Commons vote would be regarded as fatally weakened, and the whole government would resign, usually precipitating a general election. In modern practice, when the Government party has an absolute majority in the House, only loss of supply and the express vote "that this House has no confidence in Her Majesty's Government" are treated as having this effect; dissenters on a minor issue within the majority party are unlikely to force an election with the probable loss of their seats and salaries.
Parliamentary business
[edit]House of Commons Standing Order 14 states that government business has precedence (that is, priority) on every day it sits.[76] Therefore, most of the time the PM can control what is debated in the House of Commons, and when. Even with non-Government business, although the PM does not control the topics raised, the Government controls "when the time allotted to the Opposition or backbench business is scheduled—meaning that they can simply choose to delay scheduling this time if they think something politically embarrassing might be debated."[77] This means it is difficult for Parliament to debate matters, and extremely difficult for Parliament to pass legislation, against the Government's (and PM's) will.[78][79]
King's Consent is required before certain types of bill can be debated by Parliament. The prime minister can advise the Monarch to withhold his consent, thus preventing Parliament debating the bill. For example, prime minister Harold Wilson used this power in 1964 and 1969 to prevent Parliament debating bills about peerages and Zimbabwean independence.[80][81]
Other Parliamentary powers
[edit]The Intelligence Services Act 1994, which established the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament (ISC), gave the PM the power to appoint the members of the ISC.[82] The Justice and Security Act 2013 reduced this instead to a power to nominate the nine members of the ISC,[83] and these nominees are then voted upon and appointed by Parliament. This is different to the Select Committees, whose members are elected. Under the 1994 Act, the PM had the power to appoint the chair, but since the 2013 Act, the chair is now chosen by the ISC members.[84] In 2020, PM Boris Johnson's preference for chair was Chris Grayling, but the ISC members elected Julian Lewis.[85] The PM has the power to agree a MOU with the ISC that sets out what other Government activities the ISC may oversee that are not covered in the Act.[86] The PM is able to control what operational matters are considered by the ISC.[86] The PM has the right to see any ISC report before it is laid before Parliament, and can require the ISC to exclude any matter from any of its reports if the PM considers that the matter would be prejudicial to the continued discharge of the functions of the intelligence services.[87]
From 1966, the Wilson Doctrine meant the telephones of Parliamentarians could not be tapped unless the prime minister chose to reverse this policy. Subsequent prime ministers have regularly confirmed that the ban remains in place. The Investigatory Powers Act 2016 codifies the prime minister's power over the interception of Parliamentarians' communications, as it requires that a warrant authorising the interception of communications of Parliamentarians (or members of devolved legislatures) may only be issued with the approval of the prime minister.[88]
Powers of appointment
[edit]The prime minister makes all the most senior Crown appointments, and most others are made by ministers over whom the prime minister has the power of appointment and dismissal. Privy Counsellors, Ambassadors and High Commissioners, senior civil servants, senior military officers, members of important committees and commissions, and other officials are selected, and in most cases may be removed, by the prime minister. The prime minister also formally advises the sovereign on the appointment of archbishops and bishops of the Church of England,[89] but the prime minister's discretion is limited by the existence of the Crown Nominations Commission. The appointment of senior judges, while constitutionally still on the advice of the prime minister, is now made on the basis of recommendations from independent bodies.
Peerages, knighthoods, and most other honours are bestowed by the sovereign only on the advice of the prime minister. The only important British honours over which the prime minister does not have control are the Order of the Garter, the Order of the Thistle, the Order of Merit, the Royal Victorian Chain, the Royal Victorian Order, and the Order of St John, which are all within the "personal gift" of the sovereign.
The Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (IPA) gives the PM the power to appoint the Investigatory Powers Commissioner and other Judicial Commissioners,[90] who oversee use of the IPA. The PM can require the Commissioner to make a report to him at any time,[91] and the PM can exclude from publication any part of the Commissioner's reports if the PM decides it meets certain criteria.[92]
The PM appoints the chair of each of the public sector pay Review Bodies,[93][94] and decides whether to implement their recommendations.[95] For the Police Remuneration Review Body, this power of appointment is provided by the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.[96][97]
Museums and galleries
[edit]- The Imperial War Museum Act 1920 makes the prime minister the appointing authority for 10 members of the Museum's Board of Trustees.[98][99]
- The British Museum Act 1963 provides for the prime minister to appoint 15 of the 25 Trustees of the British Museum,[100][101] and for the Director of the British Museum to be appointed only with the approval of the prime minister.[102]
- Under the Museums and Galleries Act 1992,[103] the prime minister appoints the members of the Boards of Trustees of the National Gallery (except one member),[104] the Tate Gallery (except one member),[105] the National Portrait Gallery,[106] and the Wallace Collection.[107]
- The National Heritage Act 1983 provides for the prime minister to appoint the members and the chairs of the Boards of Trustees of the Victoria and Albert Museum and the Science Museum, and for the Director of the Victoria and Albert Museum and Director of the Science Museum to be appointed only with the approval of the prime minister.[108][109]
Powers over their political party
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0e/Gordon_Brown_-_Labour_Party_Conference_2008.jpg/220px-Gordon_Brown_-_Labour_Party_Conference_2008.jpg)
The prime minister is leader of their political party. In recent decades the prime minister has been either the Leader of the Conservative Party (UK) or Leader of the Labour Party (UK). As such the PM has the powers over their party given to the leader by their party's rules at the time.
- Suspending or expelling MPs from the party. For example, in May 2009, Gordon Brown suspended Elliot Morley from the Parliamentary Labour Party.[110][111] In the September 2019 suspension of rebel Conservative MPs, Boris Johnson withdrew the whip (expelled from the Conservative party) 21 MPs,[112][113] then later re-admitted some.[114]
- Appointing some party officials. The Chairman of the Conservative Party[115] and Treasurer of the Conservative Party[116] are appointed by the leader of the Conservative party, therefore by the prime minister when the Conservative leader is prime minister. The Chair of the Labour Party (UK) (different to the chair of Labour's National Executive Committee) is appointed by the leader of the Labour party. For example, in the May 2006 reshuffle, Tony Blair replaced Labour Chair Ian McCartney with Hazel Blears.
- The party's governing body. The leaders can appoint/nominate some member(s) of the Conservative Party Board and National Executive Committee of the Labour Party. For example, Tony Blair refused to grant Chancellor Gordon Brown a seat on the NEC in 2003,[117] but did so in 2005.[118]
International powers
[edit]The UK has considerable international soft power. For example, following the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in 2018, a number of countries and other organisations expelled a total of more than 150 Russian diplomats in a show of solidarity with the UK, a result largely attributed to prime minister Theresa May.[119][120]
The prime minister attends the annual G7 forum, widely considered to wield significant international influence.[121]
The prime minister was required to extend Brexit deadlines by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2019 and European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019 (now both repealed).
Other powers (residences)
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e9/The_Prime_Minister%2C_Shri_Narendra_Modi_and_the_Prime_Minister_of_United_Kingdom_%28UK%29%2C_Mr._David_Cameron_during_a_private_tete-a-tete%2C_at_Chequers%2C_in_London_on_November_13%2C_2015_%281%29.jpg/220px-thumbnail.jpg)
In 1732, King George II offered to give 10 Downing Street to Robert Walpole, but he accepted on the condition that the gift was to the office of First Lord of the Treasury rather than to him personally.[122][123][124] Therefore, the prime minister has the right to reside there, when they also hold that position (as has historically usually, though not always, been the case). While 11 Downing Street is the official residence of the Chancellor, in practice the prime minister and chancellor may switch, with the prime minister occupying Number 11, though Number 10 remains their official residence.
The Chequers Estate Act 1917 gives the prime minister the right to use Chequers as their official country residence.[125]
The terms of the charitable trust, established in 1942, which owns Dorneywood, give the prime minister the right to use Dorneywood themselves or nominate, at their discretion, another Minister to be its resident.[126][127][128]
Under the Chevening Estate Act 1959, the prime minister can occupy Chevening, or can nominate a Cabinet minister or a lineal descendant of King George VI, or the spouse, widow or widower of such a descendant, to occupy it.[129][130]
Contemporary theories of prime ministerial power
[edit]Varying and competing theories of the role and power of the contemporary modern prime minister have emerged in the post-war period, particularly in response to new styles of leadership and governance. The classic view of Cabinet Government was laid out by Walter Bagehot in The English Constitution (1867) in which he described the prime minister as the primus inter pares ("first among equals").[131] This view was challenged in The British Cabinet by John P. Mackintosh, who instead used the terminology of Prime Ministerial Government to describe the British government.[132] This transformation, according to Mackintosh primarily resulted because of the diminishing role of the Cabinet Ministers and because of centralisation of the party machine and the bureaucracy.[132] Richard Crossman also alluded to the presidentialisation of British politics in the Introduction to the 1963 version of Walter Bagehot's The English Constitution.[133] Crossman mentions the Second World War, and its immediate aftermath as a water-shed moment for Britain that led to immense accumulation of power in the hands of the British prime minister[133] These powers, according to Crossman, are so immense that their study require the use of presidential parallels.[133]
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/51/Winston_Churchill_waves_to_crowds_in_Whitehall_in_London_as_they_celebrate_VE_Day%2C_8_May_1945._H41849.jpg/220px-Winston_Churchill_waves_to_crowds_in_Whitehall_in_London_as_they_celebrate_VE_Day%2C_8_May_1945._H41849.jpg)
Presidentialisation thesis
[edit]The most prominent characterisation of prime ministerial power to emerge is the presidentialisation thesis. This asserts that the prime minister has become more detached from Cabinet, party and Parliament and operates as if the occupant of the office is elected directly by the people.[134] The thesis is usually presented with comparisons to the American Presidency. Thomas Poguntke and Paul Webb define it as:
"the development of increasing leadership power resources and autonomy within the party and the political executive respectively, and increasingly leadership-centered electoral processes."[135]
The thesis has been most popularised by Michael Foley, who wrote two books, namely, The Rise of the British Presidency, and The British Presidency: Tony Blair and the Politics of Public Leadership that are solely dedicated to the subject of presidentialisation in Britain.[136][137] Foley writes:
The British Prime Minister has to all intents and purposes turned, not into a British version of an American president, but into an authentically British president.[136]
The thesis has been widely applied to the premiership of Tony Blair as many sources such as former ministers have suggested that decision-making was controlled by him and Gordon Brown, and the Cabinet was no longer used for decision-making.[138] Former ministers such as Clare Short and Chris Smith have criticised the lack of decision-making power in Cabinet. When she resigned, Short denounced "the centralisation of power into the hands of the prime minister and an increasingly small number of advisers".[139] Graham Allen (a Government Whip during Tony Blair's first government) made the case in The Last Prime Minister: Being Honest About the UK Presidency (2003) that in fact the office of Prime Minister has presidential powers.[140]
The notion of presidentialisation in British politics has been criticised, however, due to the structural and constitutional differences between Britain and the United States. These authors cite the stark differences between the British parliamentary model, with its principle of parliamentary sovereignty, and the American presidential model, which has its roots in the principle of separation of powers. For example, according to John Hart, using the American example to explain the accumulation of power in the hands of the British PM is flawed and that changing dynamics of the British executive can only be studied in Britain's own historical and structural sense.[141] The power that a prime minister has over their Cabinet colleagues is directly proportional to the amount of support that they have with their political parties and this is often related to whether the party considers them to be an electoral asset or liability. Additionally, when a party is divided into factions a prime minister may be forced to include other powerful party members in the Cabinet for party political cohesion. The prime minister's personal power is also curtailed if their party is in a power-sharing arrangement, or a formal coalition with another party (as happened in the coalition government of 2010 to 2015).[142][143]
Keith Dowding argues, as well, that British prime ministers are already more powerful than the American presidents, as the prime minister is part of the legislature. Therefore, unlike presidents, the prime minister can directly initiate legislation and due to the context British politics functions within, faces fewer "veto players" than a president.[144] Thus, Dowding argues that adding to these powers, makes the prime minister less like presidents, and that what Britain is witnessing can be best explained as Prime Ministerialisation of British politics.[144] The work of Martin J. Smith,[145] importantly, runs contrary to these increasingly personalised conceptualisations of the modern prime minister, however. The Core Executive model asserts that prime ministerial power (especially of individual leaders, such as Thatcher and Blair) has been greatly overstated, and, instead, is both dependent upon and constrained by relationships, or "dependency linkages", with other institutions in government, such as members of the Cabinet or the Treasury. In this model, prime ministers are seen to have improved their institutional position, but rejects the notion that they dominate government and that they act, or have the ability to act, as Presidents due to the aforementioned dependencies and constraints "that define decision-making in central government." Smith emphasises "complex resource relationships" (or rather how formal and informal powers are used) and what resources a particular actor possesses. In this case, the prime minister naturally holds more resources than others. These include patronage, control of the Cabinet agenda, appointment of Cabinet Committees and the prime minister's office, as well as collective oversight and the ability to intervene in any policy area. However, all actors possess "resources" and government decision making relies upon resource exchange in order to achieve policy goals, not through command alone.[146] Smith originally used this model to explain the resignation of Margaret Thatcher in 1990, concluding that:
Government is not cabinet government or prime ministerial government. Cabinets and Prime Ministers act within the context of mutual dependence based on the exchange of resources with each other and with other actors and institutions within the core executive.[147]
Prime ministerial leadership as statecraft
[edit]Prime ministerial leadership has been described by academics as needing to involve successful statecraft. Statecraft is the idea that successful prime ministers need to maintain power in office in order to achieve any substantive long-term policy reform or political objectives.[148] To achieve successful statecraft leaders must undertake key tasks including demonstrating competence in office, developing winning electoral strategies and carefully managing the constitution in order to protect their political interests. Interviews with former prime ministers and party leaders in the UK found the approach to be an accurate part of some of the core tasks of political leadership.[149] Tony Blair was the first prime minister to be assessed using the academic framework and was judged to be a successful leader in these terms.[150] Assessments have been made of other leaders using the model.[151][152]
See also
[edit]- Powers of the home secretary
- Powers of the police in the United Kingdom
- Powers of the fire service in the United Kingdom
- Powers of the president of the United States
References
[edit]- ^ a b c House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee (19 June 2014). "Role and powers of the Prime Minister" (PDF). Retrieved 14 February 2021.
Report in webpage format
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|quote=
- ^ https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/powerful-world-leaders/6/
- ^ "Function of the Prime Minister and his staff". Cabinet Office. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
- ^ "Prime Minister (Office, Role and Functions) Bill" (PDF). parliament.uk. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
- ^ "Historic Hansard for 19 July 2002". parliament.uk. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Cabinet Office (October 2011). "The Cabinet Manual". The Cabinet Manual.
- ^ a b c d Lord Hennessy (21 February 2011). "HC 842 The role and powers of the Prime Minister". parliament.uk. Retrieved 14 February 2021.
- ^ "Appointment of prime ministers and the role of the King". Institute for Government. 13 September 2019. Retrieved 10 September 2023.
After the outgoing prime minister has left, the incoming prime minister arrives and is formally asked by the King to form a government.
- ^ "Ministerial and other Maternity Allowances Act 2021: Section 1", legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives, 2021 c. 5 (s. 1), retrieved 13 January 2024,
(2)The Prime Minister may designate a mother or expectant mother as a Minister on Leave if—
- ^ Bagehot, Walter (1867). The English Constitution. Project Gutenburg Ebook. Retrieved 25 April 2012.
- ^ Brazier, Rodney (1997). Ministers of the Crown. Oxford University Press. p. 203. ISBN 0-19-825988-3.
- ^ a b Brazier, Rodney (1997). Ministers of the Crown. Oxford University Press. p. 205. ISBN 0-19-825988-3.
- ^ "Rishi Sunak's five promises: What progress has he made?". BBC NEWS. 11 August 2023. Retrieved 12 August 2023.
On 4 January, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak set out his five priorities for 2023. "I fully expect you to hold my government and I to account on delivering those goals," he said.
- ^ "How government works". GOV.UK. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
The Prime Minister is the leader of Her Majesty's Government and is ultimately responsible for all policy and decisions.
- ^ "Boris Johnson refuses to say why he overruled Priti Patel and kept UK borders open when pandemic started". The Independent. 20 January 2021. Retrieved 23 January 2021.
- ^ "Priti Patel says she wanted UK borders shut last March". The Guardian. 20 January 2021. Retrieved 23 January 2021.
Boris Johnson urged to explain why he apparently rejected home secretary's Covid advice.
- ^ "Tony Blair overruled Donald Dewar on devolving abortion powers to Scotland". The National. 20 July 2021. Retrieved 1 January 2022.
- ^ "Alistair Darling wanted tougher Pre-Budget report but was 'overruled by Gordon Brown'". Daily Telegraph. 11 December 2009. Retrieved 1 January 2022.
- ^ "PM 'overruled' Darling on tackling UK's debt". Glasgow Times. 11 December 2009. Retrieved 1 January 2022.
- ^ "Thatcher overruled minister to keep Moors murderers locked up for life". The Guardian. 20 July 2017. Retrieved 1 January 2022.
Margaret Thatcher intervened to overrule the home secretary and ensure that the Moors murderers, Myra Hindley and Ian Brady, were never released from prison, Downing Street papers have revealed.
- ^ "List of Cabinet Committees". GOV.UK. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
- ^ "Income tax abolished and reintroduced". Parliament.UK. Retrieved 23 January 2021.
Sir Robert Peel, the Prime Minister, was keen to facilitate this thinking. In 1842, therefore, he re-introduced income tax at 7d in the pound on incomes over £150.
- ^ "16 March 1842: Income tax introduced". The Guardian. 8 May 2011. Retrieved 23 January 2021.
Robert Peel, the prime minister, brings in the first peace-time income tax.
- ^ "Blair: we must renew Trident". The Guardian. 4 December 2006. Retrieved 17 January 2021.
Tony Blair today recommended that Britain renew its Trident nuclear deterrent into at least the middle of the century, calling it "the ultimate insurance".
- ^ "Rebellion fails to halt Trident replacement". Financial Times. 14 March 2007. Retrieved 17 January 2021.
Almost 100 Labour MPs on Wednesday rounded on Tony Blair over his decision to replace the UK's Trident nuclear weapons system
- ^ "Crossrail gets the green signal". BBC News. 5 October 2007. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
The £16bn Crossrail scheme to build a railway link through the centre of London has been given the go-ahead by Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
- ^ "UK's PM gives go-ahead to Crossrail". Financial Times. 5 October 2007. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
Mainline commuter trains should be running east to west under London by 2017 after the prime minister committed government funding to the long-awaited, £16bn Crossrail project.
- ^ "Ex-PM David Cameron says he doesn't regret calling Brexit referendum". NBC News. 11 December 2018. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
Does he now have second thoughts about setting the wheels of Brexit in motion? He says no. "I don't regret calling the referendum. I made a promise in the election to call the referendum," Cameron said
- ^ "David Cameron: I don't regret calling EU referendum". BBC News. 16 January 2019. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
Former UK Prime Minister David Cameron says he does not regret calling the 2016 referendum on whether the UK should stay in the EU... Asked if regretted calling the referendum, he said: "I don't regret calling the referendum."
- ^ View, Telegraph (13 September 2019). "David Cameron was right to call a referendum. The only problem was that the powerful ignored it". Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
- ^ "Theresa May set to give go-ahead for Hinkley Point C nuclear plant". The Guardian. 14 September 2016. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
Prime minister poised to approve £18bn project but is expected to seek a better deal with China on future electricity prices
- ^ Ward, Andrew; Pickard, Jim; Stothard, Michael (15 September 2016). "UK gives go-ahead for 'revised' £18bn Hinkley Point plant". Financial Times. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
Theresa May has given the go-ahead to the £18bn Hinkley Point power plant under a revised agreement that has been welcomed by the French developer and Chinese state-owned investor behind Europe's biggest energy project. The UK prime minister gave her assent on Thursday to build Britain's first new nuclear plant in a generation
- ^ "Coronavirus: Boris Johnson imposes nationwide lockdown". The Independent. 23 March 2020. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
Boris Johnson has imposed an unprecedented three-week nationwide lockdown across the UK in an attempt to bring a halt to the coronavirus outbreak.
- ^ "To fight new COVID strain, PM Johnson reverses Christmas plans for millions". Reuters. 19 December 2020. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson imposed an effective lockdown on over 16 million people in England and reversed plans to ease curbs over Christmas... Johnson tore up plans to allow three households to mix indoors for five days over the festive period, and said London and southeast England, which are currently in the highest level of a three-tier system of rules, would now be placed in a new Tier 4 level, similar to those of a recent national lockdown.
- ^ "Boris Johnson Extends Lockdown to Much of England to Curb Virus". Bloomberg. 23 December 2020. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson imposed tougher regulations across a large swath of England in an effort to stamp down on the mutant strain of coronavirus that's spreading quickly across the country.
- ^ "What is the Third Way?". BBC News. 27 September 1999. Retrieved 28 January 2021.
Tony Blair has committed his government to treading the Third Way.
- ^ "Clinton and Blair envision a 'Third Way' International Movement". Washington Post. 28 June 1998. Retrieved 28 January 2021.
President Clinton and British Prime Minister Tony Blair are seeking to take advantage of the unprecedented number of Western governments controlled by center-left parties to turn their "third way" political strategies in the United States and Great Britain into an international movement.
- ^ "'Third Way' gets world hearing". BBC News. 31 May 2000. Retrieved 28 January 2021.
Main proponents of the "Third Way" Blair and Clinton
- ^ "David Cameron launches Tories' 'big society' plan". BBC News. 19 July 2010. Retrieved 23 January 2021.
David Cameron has launched his "big society" drive to empower communities, describing it as his "great passion"... "Things that fire you up in the morning, that drive you, that you truly believe will make a real difference to the country you love, and my great passion is building the big society."
- ^ "David Cameron launches £600m 'big society' fund". The Guardian. 4 April 2012. Retrieved 23 January 2021.
David Cameron will attempt to breathe fresh life into his flagging "big society" initiative when he launches a £600m fund to support grassroots social projects on Wednesday.
- ^ "Theresa May paves way for new generation of grammar schools". The Guardian. 6 March 2017. Retrieved 28 January 2021.
Theresa May will pave the way for a new generation of grammar schools on Wednesday, as her chancellor uses the budget to push ahead with a controversial policy that is seen as a key priority for the prime minister... But the decision... underlines a determination to drive forward what many consider May's flagship education reform.
- ^ Turner, Camilla (21 March 2019). "First new grammar schools could open under the Theresa May expansion plan". Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 28 January 2021.
The first new grammar schools could open under the Theresa May expansion plan, it has emerged... The £50 million expansion fund is the bedrock of Theresa May's trimmed-down grammar revolution.
- ^ Rhodes, Chris (17 June 2020). "The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office: How are departments reorganised?". House of Commons Library. Retrieved 3 July 2021.
Why are departments reorganised? The Prime Minister has almost complete discretion over how to organise government departments.
- ^ "Machinery of Government Changes". Hansard. 18 July 2016. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
- ^ Mance, Henry (14 July 2016). "Theresa May's new regime creates new departments". Financial Times. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
In his six years as prime minister, David Cameron resisted the urge to create or abolish government departments, arguing that the disruption would outweigh the benefits. Theresa May has taken a very different approach. In her first 24 hours as leader, she created new ministries for Brexit and international trade, and merged the departments of business and energy. The department of education, not business, will now take responsibility for universities and further education. The revamp was not total: international development and culture, media and sport — two departments whose future has been subject to continual speculation — both survived.
- ^ "Department for Exiting the European Union: Closure". Hansard. 3 February 2020. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
- ^ "Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010: Section 15", legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives, 2010 c. 25 (s. 15), retrieved 30 January 2021,
(1)... The requirements are— ...(b) the appointment is approved by the Prime Minister
- ^ "Ministerial Code §3.6". GOV.UK. 23 August 2019. Retrieved 11 December 2021.
- ^ "The Queen and the Armed Forces". The Royal Family. 9 January 2017. Retrieved 14 February 2021.
- ^ Hennessy, Peter (2000). The Prime Minister: the Office and its Holders Since 1945. Penguin Group. p. 103. ISBN 0713993405.
- ^ "The Governance of Britain: War powers and treaties: Limiting Executive powers" (PDF). gov.uk. 25 October 2007. p. 22. Retrieved 14 February 2021.
- ^ a b Mills, Claire (17 April 2018). "Parliamentary approval for military action". parliament.uk. Retrieved 16 February 2021.
- ^ "The Governance of Britain: War powers and treaties: Limiting Executive powers" (PDF). gov.uk. 25 October 2007. p. 33. Retrieved 16 February 2021.
- ^ Mr. Churchill, The Prime Minister (8 December 1941). "PRIME MINISTER'S DECLARATION.". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). Vol. 376. House of Commons. col. 1358–1359.
With the full approval of the nation, and of the Empire, I pledged the word of Great Britain, about a month ago, that should the United States be involved in war with Japan, a British declaration of war would follow within the hour. I, therefore, spoke to President Roosevelt on the Atlantic telephone last night, with a view to arranging the timing of our respective declarations... The Cabinet, therefore, which met at 12.30 to-day, authorised an immediate declaration of war upon Japan.
- ^ Kettle, Martin (23 August 2005). "A declaration of war on this medieval royal prerogative". The Guardian. Retrieved 13 January 2024.
In principle, if not in practice, a prime minister could take the nation to war in defiance of a parliamentary vote; he wields a theoretical power that a believer in the divine right of kings would have recognised.
- ^ Samiloff, Julian (24 April 2008). "Who should declare war". New Law Journal (7318). Retrieved 27 June 2024.
It's a fact of our constitution that under the Royal Prerogative the power to declare war and commit British forces to military operations is vested in the prime minister... It may be posited that in exercising this particular prerogative the prime minister enjoys what ancient kings once enjoyed: the use of almost absolute power in the application of a discretion, and that in doing so he knows that such use cannot generally be challenged in the courts or stopped by a Parliament controlled by his party.
- ^ Russell, Meg; Sciara, Maria (20 October 2007). "Why Does the Government get Defeated in the House of Lords?: The Lords, the Party System and British Politics". British Politics. 2 (3): 299–322. doi:10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200064. S2CID 153981924.
Government defeats in the House of Commons are rare, and never go unnoticed. House of Lords defeats are also only occasionally brought to public attention. Yet the government is defeated frequently in the House of Lords, and the number and severity of these defeats appears to be on an upward trajectory.
- ^ Murray, Bruce (Autumn 2009). "The 'people's budget' a century on" (PDF). Journal of Liberal History. 64: 4–13. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
Asquith introduced the Parliament Bill in the Commons and intimated that, if the Bill was rejected by the Lords, the government would go to the King for a dissolution on condition that, in the event of the Liberals being returned to power, he would guarantee to create enough new peers to overcome the opposition of the Lords.
- ^ "Speaker of House of Lords warns Theresa May against appointing new peers to get Brexit bills passed". The Independent. 6 January 2017. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
The speaker of the House of Lords has warned Theresa May against stuffing the Chamber with new peers in a bid to get Brexit through. Lord Fowler, a Tory peer until he took up the speaker's post in the Chamber, intervened after threats that ministers might "do a Lloyd George and create a thousand peers" to pass the Government's Brexit legislation if those already in the Lords opposed it.
- ^ Booth, Jenny (7 February 2006). "Blair defends school reform climbdown". The Times. London.
- ^ "Delegated legislation". Parliament.UK. Retrieved 8 November 2020.
Secondary legislation is law created by ministers (or other bodies) under powers given to them by an Act of Parliament (primary legislation).
- ^ "Standing Orders of the House of Commons - Public Business 2015". parliament.uk. Retrieved 31 December 2020.
13.—(1)Whenever the House stands adjourned and it is represented to the Speaker by Her Majesty's Ministers that the public interest requires that the House should meet at a time earlier than that to which the House stands adjourned, the Speaker, if he is satisfied that the public interest does so require, may give notice that, being so satisfied, he appoints a time for the House to meet, and the House shall accordingly meet at the time stated in such notice.
- ^ "Brexit: Jeremy Corbyn urges Theresa May to cut short MPs' break for vote". BBC. 28 December 2018. Retrieved 26 December 2020.
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has urged the prime minister to cut short MPs' Christmas break to allow for an earlier vote on her Brexit deal.
- ^ "Recall of Parliament". Parliament.UK. Retrieved 22 December 2020.
During times when the House of Commons is not sitting, the Speaker can, if asked by the Government, decide to recall the House of Commons.
- ^ "David Cameron recalls parliament over Syria crisis". The Guardian. 27 August 2013. Retrieved 26 December 2020.
The prime minister said the Commons speaker, John Bercow, had agreed to his request to recall parliament from its summer recess on Thursday. Cameron tweeted: "Speaker agrees my request to recall Parliament on Thurs."
- ^ "Proroguing Parliament". Institute for Government. 6 June 2019. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
Unlike the dissolution of Parliament, which is governed by the Fixed-term Parliaments Act, proroguing Parliament is a Royal Prerogative power exercisable by the Queen, (who, by convention, follows the advice of the prime minister). It does not require the consent of MPs.
- ^ "What is the prorogation of Parliament?". BBC. 8 October 2019. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
The decision to prorogue rests with the Queen, done on the advice of the prime minister.
- ^ "Prorogation". parliament.uk. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
The Queen formally prorogues Parliament on the advice of the Privy Council.
- ^ "Johnson's suspension of parliament unlawful, supreme court rules". The Guardian. 24 September 2019. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
Judges rule unanimously that PM's decision to prorogue parliament can be examined by judges. The supreme court has ruled that Boris Johnson's advice to the Queen that parliament should be prorogued for five weeks at the height of the Brexit crisis was unlawful.
- ^ R v. The Prime Minister, Paragraph 69 (Supreme Court 24 September 2019), Text.
- ^ "Labour fears Johnson is preparing for a 2023 election". Financial Times. 1 June 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2022.
The Fixed-Term Parliaments Act 2011 introduced by David Cameron's coalition government removed the longstanding power of the prime minister to call a general election and instead created what should normally be a five-year period between polls.
- ^ "Is axing fixed-term parliaments a good idea?". BBC News. 7 March 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2022.
In 2011, the Fixed-term Parliaments Act (FTPA) set the length of time between general elections at five years - and transferred the power to call an early election from the prime minister to MPs.
- ^ "Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 section 3(2)". GOV.UK. Retrieved 7 October 2020.
- ^ "Boris Johnson pushes for power to call election at any time". BBC News. 12 May 2021. Retrieved 1 January 2022.
The government has set in motion its plan for prime ministers to regain the power to call general elections whenever they like.
- ^ "MPs quiz Minister on new reforms to calling general elections". UK Parliament. 21 June 2021. Retrieved 1 January 2022.
The new Bill looks to restore the power of the Prime Minister to call elections when they choose.
- ^ "Standing Orders of the House of Commons - Public Business 2015". parliament.uk. Retrieved 7 October 2020.
14.—(1)Save as provided in this order, Government business shall have precedence at every sitting.
- ^ "Who should control the parliamentary timetable?". Institute for Government. 28 January 2019. Retrieved 7 October 2020.
- ^ "Time". Institute for Government. 20 May 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
Control of parliament's time was fraught, as the May and Johnson governments clashed with backbench MPs over control of the order paper. Extraordinarily, MPs twice succeeded in using parliamentary procedures to take control of the Commons' agenda to pass legislation against the will of the government. Both May and Johnson used the government's control over the schedule of parliamentary business to their political advantage, seeking to buy time as their legislation ran into trouble and preventing MPs from holding debates that might be politically embarrassing.
- ^ Cowie, Graeme; Samra, Sandip (26 June 2019). "Taking control of the order paper". House of Commons Library. Retrieved 7 October 2020.
Why is it difficult to take control over the order paper? If a majority of MPs can agree, all that is needed to override the precedence of Government business is an order of the House of Commons. However, the opportunities to vote on a motion that could become an order are limited.
- ^ "Ministers accused of exploiting royal veto to block embarrassing legislation". The Guardian. 15 January 2013. Retrieved 12 December 2020.
It also emerged that Harold Wilson used the Queen's power to kill off politically embarrassing bills about Zimbabwe and peerages... The first came in 1964 in the case of the titles (abolition) bill, which was embarrassing to Harold Wilson's newly elected Labour government, which had a slender majority and did not want any legislative debate about the desirability of titles such as lordships and damehoods. The other was the Rhodesia independence bill of 1969 which sought autonomy for the African colony which Wilson's government was opposed to while it was in a state of rebellion.
- ^ "The impact of Queen's and Prince's Consent on the legislative process - Political and Constitutional Reform. Chapter 3: Should Consent continue to be part of the legislative process?". Parliament.UK. Retrieved 31 December 2020.
- ^ "Intelligence Services Act 1994 section 10(3)". GOV.UK. Retrieved 18 November 2020.
The members of the Committee shall be appointed by the Prime Minister after consultation with the Leader of the Opposition
- ^ "Justice and Security Act 2013 section 1(4)". GOV.UK. Retrieved 15 June 2020.
A person is not eligible to become a member of the ISC unless the person — (a) is nominated for membership by the Prime Minister
- ^ "What is the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC)?". Hansard Society. Retrieved 14 February 2022.
Under the 2013 Justice and Security Act, the Chair of the ISC is chosen by the Committee. This made a change from the 1994 Act, which had specified that the Prime Minister appointed the Chair.
- ^ "Chris Grayling fails to become chair of intelligence and security committee after Tory challenge". SKY NEWS. 15 July 2020. Retrieved 14 February 2022.
Chris Grayling, Downing Street's pick to chair the prestigious intelligence and security committee, has been usurped by another Tory candidate.
- ^ a b "Justice and Security Act 2013 section 2". GOV.UK. Retrieved 15 June 2020.
- ^ "Justice and Security Act 2013 section 3(3-4)". GOV.UK. Retrieved 15 June 2020.
- ^ "Investigatory Powers Act 2016 sections 26(2) and 111(3)". GOV.UK. Retrieved 9 November 2020.
The Secretary of State may not issue the warrant without the approval of the Prime Minister
- ^ Barnett, p. 249
- ^ "Investigatory Powers Act 2016, section 227(1)". legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 15 June 2020.
- ^ "Investigatory Powers Act 2016, section 234(3)". legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 16 November 2020.
(3) The Investigatory Powers Commissioner must, at any time, make any report to the Prime Minister which has been requested by the Prime Minister.
- ^ "Investigatory Powers Act 2016, section 234(7)". legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 16 November 2020.
(7) The Prime Minister may, after consultation with the Investigatory Powers Commissioner and (so far as the report relates to functions under Part 3 of the Police Act 1997) the Scottish Ministers, exclude from publication any part of a report under subsection (1) if, in the opinion of the Prime Minister,...
- ^ "Pay review bodies". Institute for Government. 19 December 2022. Retrieved 22 August 2023.
Each pay review body is usually made up of between six and eight members. The chair of each committee is appointed by the prime minister
- ^ "Armed Forces Pay Review Body (AFPRB)". GOV.UK. Retrieved 8 November 2020.
The Prime Minister, Theresa May, has invited John Steele to extend his tenure as Chair of the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body (AFPRB)... The Prime Minister has re-appointed Mr John Steele as Chair to the AFPRB to commence in March 2016 for a period of 2 years.
- ^ Malnick, Edward (28 July 2018). "Gavin Williamson in new row with Theresa May over pay for Armed Forces". The Telegraph. Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 8 November 2020.
Gavin Williamson has opened a new row with Theresa May and Philip Hammond by accusing the Prime Minister and Chancellor of ignoring an official recommendation on increasing the pay of members of the Armed Forces. In a letter to 10 Downing Street, the Defence Secretary warned that Mrs May and Mr Hammond had taken the "wrong decision" by failing to honour in full a recommended 2.9 per cent pay rise for military personnel, of which Mr Williamson had been "strongly in favour".
- ^ "Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014: Section 132", legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives, 2014 c. 12 (s. 132), retrieved 5 July 2023,
(2)It shall consist of— (a)a chair appointed by the Prime Minister
- ^ "New chair of police and NCA pay bodies appointed". GOV.UK. 13 January 2022. Retrieved 5 July 2023.
The Prime Minister has appointed Zoë Billingham as the new Chair of the Police Remuneration Review Body (PRRB) and the National Crime Agency Remuneration Review Body (NCARRB).
- ^ "Imperial War Museum Act 1920, Schedule - Constitution and Proceedings of Board of Trustees". legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
- ^ "Prime Minister appoints 3 Trustees to the Imperial War Museum". gov.uk. 27 March 2015. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
- ^ "British Museum Act 1963: Section 1", legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives, 1963 c. 24 (s. 1), retrieved 2 September 2023,
(b) fifteen appointed by the Prime Minister
- ^ "Prime Minister appoints five new British Museum Trustees". gov.uk. 23 December 2015. Retrieved 2 September 2023.
- ^ "British Museum Act 1963: Section 6", legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives, 1963 c. 24 (s. 6), retrieved 2 September 2023,
(1)There shall be a Director of the British Museum, who shall be a person appointed by the Trustees with the approval of the Prime Minister
- ^ "Museums and Galleries Act 1992, Schedules 1-4". legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 14 July 2023.
- ^ "Prime Minister Appoints New National Gallery Trustees". gov.uk. 30 March 2016. Retrieved 30 July 2023.
- ^ "Fine Art professor appointed as a Trustee of Tate". Newcastle University. 25 April 2018. Retrieved 14 July 2023.
The Prime Minister has appointed Jane Wilson as a Trustee of Tate for four years
- ^ "Ross's Portrait Gallery extension awaits PM sign-off amid Mustique holiday probe". SKY NEWS. 13 May 2021. Retrieved 14 July 2023.
- ^ "The Prime Minister has reappointed three Trustees of the Wallace Collection". gov.uk. 25 July 2022. Retrieved 14 July 2023.
- ^ "National Heritage Act 1983: Schedule 1", legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives, 1983 c. 47 (sch. 1), retrieved 22 August 2023,
3(2)The trustees shall be appointed by the Prime Minister, who shall appoint one of them to be chairman... 4(1)There shall be a Director of the Victoria and Albert Museum who shall be appointed by the Board with the approval of the Prime Minister... 13(2)The trustees shall be appointed by the Prime Minister, who shall appoint one of them to be chairman... 14(1)There shall be a Director of the Science Museum who shall be appointed by the Board with the approval of the Prime Minister.
- ^ Cowburn, Ashley (13 January 2017). "Theresa May gave 'rubber stamp' to Tristram Hunt's appointment as V&A director". The Independent. Retrieved 22 August 2023.
Theresa May gave the "rubber stamp" to Tristram Hunt's appointment as the director of the Victoria and Albert Museum in London, a spokesperson for the Prime Minister has confirmed.
- ^ "Brown suspends mortgage claim MP". BBC. 14 May 2009. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
Former minister Elliot Morley has been suspended from the Parliamentary Labour Party after claiming £16,000 expenses for a mortgage he had already paid off.
- ^ Naughton, Philippe (14 May 2009). "Brown suspends ex minister Elliot Morley for non existent mortgage claim". The Times. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
A former minister was suspended from the Parliamentary Labour Party today after it emerged that he had claimed £16,000 in Commons allowances towards a mortgage that he had already paid off.
- ^ Mikhailova, Anna (4 September 2019). "Boris Johnson to strip 21 Tory MPs of the Tory whip in parliamentary bloodbath". The Telegraph. Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 21 November 2020.
Boris Johnson will strip 21 Tory MPs of the whip in one of the biggest parliamentary bloodbaths in history.
- ^ "Brexit showdown: Who were Tory rebels who defied Boris Johnson?". BBC. 5 September 2019. Retrieved 21 November 2020.
Boris Johnson has expelled 21 MPs from the parliamentary Conservative Party after they rebelled against him in a bid to prevent a no-deal Brexit.
- ^ "Boris Johnson readmits 10 Brexit rebels to Tory party". BBC. 29 October 2019. Retrieved 21 November 2020.
Boris Johnson has restored the whip to 10 of the 21 Tory MPs who rebelled against him over Brexit last month.
- ^ Dale, Iain (6 October 2020). "There's a hole at the heart of the Government". The Telegraph. Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 28 November 2020.
Every Prime Minister has the perfect right to appoint a close political confidante as party chairman – Theresa May did this with Brandon Lewis, and David Cameron did it with Andrew Feldman.
- ^ "David Rowland: Multimillionaire who courted controversy throughout his rise". The Guardian. 20 August 2010. Retrieved 28 November 2020.
By June this year, Cameron had appointed him to be his party treasurer. Rowland pronounced it a "tremendous honour".
- ^ "Blair and Brown make up after row over NEC place". The Independent. 8 November 2003. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
The two men moved to limit the fallout from their bitter spat over Mr Blair's refusal to grant the Chancellor a seat on Labour's ruling national executive committee (NEC)
- ^ "Brown gets seat on Labour's NEC". BBC. 25 May 2005. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
Tony Blair has given Gordon Brown a seat on Labour's ruling National Executive Council (NEC).
- ^ Manson, Katrina; Peel, Michael (27 March 2018). "US leads international expulsions of Russian diplomats". Financial Times. Retrieved 8 November 2020.
But in a significant diplomatic victory for Theresa May, the British prime minister who has spent two weeks rallying support for her claim that the Kremlin was behind the Skripal attack, the US was joined by every large Nato ally — including France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Canada — in announcing Russian expulsions.
- ^ "Analysis: Worldwide expulsions of Russian diplomats a tribute to Theresa May's patient diplomacy". iNews. 26 March 2018. Retrieved 8 November 2020.
But she can allow herself a small pat on the back for the remarkable achievement of lining much of the western world behind Britain to take action against Moscow. That 19 countries have come together to expel Russian diplomats in protest over the Salisbury attack is a tribute to her patient diplomacy. She also persuaded the European Union to issue a strongly-worded condemnation of Russia despite the reservations of several nations including Greece and Hungary.
- ^ "What is the G7 summit, and why does it matter?". The New York Times. 10 June 2021. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
With broadly similar views on trade, political pluralism, security and human rights, they can — when they agree — wield enormous collective influence.
- ^ Selwood, Dominic (15 May 2017). "On this day in 1730: Robert Walpole, consummate wheeler-dealer, becomes Britain's first prime minister". Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
King George II presented Walpole with 10 Downing Street, which Walpole accepted on the condition it be the residence of the First Lord of the Treasury, rather than a personal gift to him.
- ^ "Sir Robert Walpole". gov.uk. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
Walpole lived in 10 Downing Street from 1735 having insisted that it become the residence of the First Lord of the Treasury, rather than being given to him personally.
- ^ Everett, Michael (21 July 2016). Ministerial Residences. Commons Briefing Papers: Number 03367. House of Commons Library.
Ten Downing Street is traditionally the home of the Prime Minister. It was offered by George II as a personal gift to Sir Robert Walpole, who was First Lord of the Treasury and effectively, though not officially, Prime Minister. Walpole declined the gift but accepted the house as a residence for holders of the office of First Lord.
- ^ Chequers Estate Act 1917 (Paragraph 1,, Schedule to the Act). 20 December 1917. Retrieved 22 December 2020.
...in order that the house may be used and maintained in perpetuity as the official country residence of the British Prime Minister...
- ^ Everett, Michael (21 July 2016). Ministerial Residences. Commons Briefing Papers: Number 03367. House of Commons Library.
Who can occupy Dorneywood? The criteria for the use of Dorneywood are set out in the terms of the charitable trust, established in 1942, which owns the property. According to the terms of the Trust Deed for Dorneywood, the Prime Minister of the day may use the house themselves or nominate, at their discretion a "Minister of the Crown" to become the resident. Previous residents have included Chancellors, a Home Secretary and other Deputy Prime Ministers.
- ^ "Dorneywood: A ministerial retreat". BBC. 1 June 2006. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
The prime minister decides which secretary of state or minister can occupy Dorneywood, with the chancellor traditionally offered the run of the estate.
- ^ "I would open chancellor's country house to the public, says John McDonnell". The Guardian. 23 November 2019. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
The prime minister of the day decides which senior minister can use Dorneywood, which is owned by a charitable trust. By convention it has gone to chancellors.
- ^ "Chevening Estate Act, 1959" (PDF). legislation.gov.uk. 9 July 1959. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
"The Nominated Person" shall mean such person (including the Prime Minister) as may from time to time be nominated (in writing) by the Prime Minister to be the Nominated Person for the purposes of these presents Provided Always :- (I) No person may be nominated as aforesaid unless such person is at the time when such person is so nominated either (i) the Prime Minister or (ii) a Minister who is a member of the Cabinet or (iii) the widow or a lineal descendant of His late Majesty King George the Sixth or the spouse, widow or widower of such a descendant.
- ^ Everett, Michael (21 July 2016). Ministerial Residences. Commons Briefing Papers: Number 03367. House of Commons Library.
Who can occupy Chevening? Under the terms of the 1959 Act, the Prime Minister has the responsibility of nominating the person to occupy the house. This person can be the Prime Minister, a minister who is a member of the Cabinet, a lineal descendant of King George VI, or the spouse, widow or widower of such a descendant.
- ^ Fairclough, Paul (2002). "6.1 The Primemister". Advanced Government and Politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-913434-2.
- ^ a b Mackintosh, John. P (1962). The British Cabinet. London: Stevens. pp. 2–25.
- ^ a b c Crossman, Richard; Bagehot, Walter (1963). "Introduction". The English Constitution. London: Fontana. pp. 1–57.
- ^ Jones, Bill; Norton, Philip; Daddow, Oliver (2018). Politics UK. Abingdon: Routledge. p. 454.
- ^ Poguntke, Thomas; Webb, Paul (2005). The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 5. ISBN 978-0-19-925201-5.
- ^ a b Foley, Michael (1993). The Rise of the British Presidency. Manchester: Manchester University Press. p. 283.
- ^ Foley, Michael (2000). The British Presidency: Tony Blair and the Politics of Public Leadership. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
- ^ Foster, Christopher (2005). "Chapter 12 Blair's Cabinet: Monarchy Returns". British Government in Crisis. Hart Publishing.
- ^ "Short launches broadside on Blair". BBC News. 12 May 2003. Retrieved 23 April 2006.
- ^ Allen, Graham (14 February 2017). The Last Prime Minister: Being Honest About the UK Presidency. Andrews UK Limited. ISBN 978-1-84540-609-7.
- ^ Hart, John (1991). "President and Prime Minister: Convergence or Divergence". Parliamentary Affairs. 44 (2): 208–225. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pa.a052294.
- ^ Williams, Andy (1998). "Prime ministerial government". UK Government & Politics. Heinemann. pp. 113–114. ISBN 978-0-435-33158-0.
- ^ Palekar, S.A. (2008). "Position of the Prime Minister". Comparative Politics and Government. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd. p. 37. ISBN 978-81-203-3335-2.
- ^ a b Dowding, Keith (April 2017). "The Prime Ministerialisation of the British Prime Minister". Parliamentary Affairs. 66 (3): 617–635. doi:10.1093/pa/gss007. hdl:1885/18172.
- ^ Smith, Martin J. (1998). The Core Executive In Britain. Palgrave MacMillan. ISBN 0-333-60515-2.
- ^ Smith, Martin J. (2010). "Intelligence and the Core Executive". Public Policy and Administration. 25 (1): 11–28. doi:10.1177/0952076709347072. S2CID 154880481.
- ^ Smith, Martin J. (1994). "the Core Executive and the Resignation of Mrs Thatcher". Public Administration. 72 (3): 341–363. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1994.tb01017.x.
- ^ James, Toby S. (January 2016). "Neo-Statecraft Theory, Historical Institutionalism and Institutional Change" (PDF). Government and Opposition. 51 (1): 84–110. doi:10.1017/gov.2014.22. ISSN 0017-257X. S2CID 67810178.
- ^ James, Toby S. (2018). "Political leadership as statecraft? Aligning theory with praxis in conversation with British party leaders" (PDF). British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 20 (3): 555–572. doi:10.1177/1369148118778961. S2CID 150049571.
- ^ Buller, Jim; James, Toby S. (September 2011). "Statecraft and the Assessment of National Political Leaders: The Case of New Labour and Tony Blair" (PDF). The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 14 (4): 534–555. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856x.2011.00471.x. ISSN 1369-1481. S2CID 145373340.
- ^ Clarke, Charles; James, Toby S (2015). British Labour leaders. London: Biteback. ISBN 978-1-84954-816-8. OCLC 1004855187.
- ^ Clarke, Charles (2015). British Conservative leaders. London: Biteback Publ. ISBN 978-1-84954-921-9. OCLC 915393779.
Works cited
[edit]- Barnett, Hilaire (2009). Constitutional & Administrative Law (7th ed.). Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge-Cavendish. ISBN 978-1-003-15563-8.